- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who here would accept a carve-out for rape, health, or “quality of life”?
Posted on 6/30/22 at 7:22 am to Ag Zwin
Posted on 6/30/22 at 7:22 am to Ag Zwin
I've said it before and I'll say it again: abortion will become illegal if/when a "gay gene" is discovered, because the proggies would lose their shite if they knew people were killing queer babies.
Now, to answer the OP's query, no. An innocent life is still an innocent life. Why should the baby be punished for someone else's crime.
It would be like the NCAA putting GA Tech on probation for Bama paying it's players.
Now, to answer the OP's query, no. An innocent life is still an innocent life. Why should the baby be punished for someone else's crime.
It would be like the NCAA putting GA Tech on probation for Bama paying it's players.
1
Posted on 6/30/22 at 7:24 am to mtntiger
Giving inch by inch is how we go to the point we did, "on demand up to and including the time of birth".
Posted on 6/30/22 at 7:26 am to Ag Zwin
Even in the Texas law which is one of,the most extreme these carve outs already exist.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 7:57 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Ok now you are just being obtuse. Obviously I’m talking about if the mothers life is in danger prior to the baby being developed enough to be viable outside the womb. Otherwise they could do a c section to save the mother and still give the baby a chance to survive. And my second point was that even in a moral society that values human life above all else we routinely make exceptions for that in cases of self defense.
It is rather arrogant on your part if you are perfectly fine with the murder of babies as you just admitted to argue this point with me. I thought you represented the option that abortion was a no go in 100% of situations. My reason was for a small infintecmal percentage of situations where there is zero chance for the baby to survive but the mother could if abortion was performed. You are ok with it for rape or incest which means you think it is ok to murder a baby just to protect the mothers feelings, and I’m not downplaying how significant those would be, but still just emotional feelings versus the life of a child. I’m starting to think we actually probably wouldn’t agree on much because you don’t seem capable of reading comprehension and rational thought. Good day sir!!!!
It is rather arrogant on your part if you are perfectly fine with the murder of babies as you just admitted to argue this point with me. I thought you represented the option that abortion was a no go in 100% of situations. My reason was for a small infintecmal percentage of situations where there is zero chance for the baby to survive but the mother could if abortion was performed. You are ok with it for rape or incest which means you think it is ok to murder a baby just to protect the mothers feelings, and I’m not downplaying how significant those would be, but still just emotional feelings versus the life of a child. I’m starting to think we actually probably wouldn’t agree on much because you don’t seem capable of reading comprehension and rational thought. Good day sir!!!!
Posted on 6/30/22 at 8:13 am to DisplacedBuckeye
You said this in one post…
“I'm never open to murdering babies. You shouldn't be, either.”
And then in a later post said you were fine with it for rape, incest or health of mother.
You sir are an idiot. At least I am consistent in my beliefs.
“I'm never open to murdering babies. You shouldn't be, either.”
And then in a later post said you were fine with it for rape, incest or health of mother.
You sir are an idiot. At least I am consistent in my beliefs.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 8:21 am to Kingshakabooboo
quote:
Ok now you are just being obtuse.
You're being intellectually inconsistent.
quote:
Obviously I’m talking about if the mothers life is in danger prior to the baby being developed enough to be viable outside the womb. Otherwise they could do a c section to save the mother and still give the baby a chance to survive.
Obviously. But at that point, you're OK with it. But not for rape, incest, underaged mothers, etc.
quote:
And my second point was that even in a moral society that values human life above all else we routinely make exceptions for that in cases of self defense.
I know the point you're trying to make. It's idiotic. If the argument against exceptions for rape is that the baby didn't do anything, it must also extend to the argument here. I don't buy that, because I'm capable of being intellectually consistent.
quote:
It is rather arrogant on your part if you are perfectly fine with the murder of babies as you just admitted to argue this point with me. I thought you represented the option that abortion was a no go in 100% of situations. My reason was for a small infintecmal percentage of situations where there is zero chance for the baby to survive but the mother could if abortion was performed. You are ok with it for rape or incest which means you think it is ok to murder a baby just to protect the mothers feelings, and I’m not downplaying how significant those would be, but still just emotional feelings versus the life of a child.
I'm not fine with murdering babies. I'm just not uneducated enough on the topic to think that abortion is always murdering babies. What I'm hoping you'll come to realize is that to be consistent with the belief that "abortion is always murder" and is always wrong, you have to actually believe that it's always murder and always wrong. All you're really doing is drawing your personal line somewhere different from people who support late-term abortion.
quote:
I’m starting to think we actually probably wouldn’t agree on much because you don’t seem capable of reading comprehension and rational thought. Good day sir!!!!
Well, if you apply the same..."logic" to everything else, no we probably wouldn't agree on much.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 8:23 am to Kingshakabooboo
quote:
At least I am consistent in my beliefs.
No you aren't. You're OK with murdering babies...but only sometimes.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 8:50 am to Kingshakabooboo
quote:It's really shocking to me that anyone, anywhere, thinks these exceptions are ok.
You are ok with it for rape or incest which means you think it is ok to murder a baby just to protect the mothers feelings, and I’m not downplaying how significant those would be, but still just emotional feelings versus the life of a child.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:59 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Now respond to your inconsistent statements.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News