- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:40 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
I don't want to silence those with different opinions than my own. I just don't want a fricking Trump tweet to be the modern assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:43 pm to Salmon
quote:
which is interesting considering Trump has banned people from his account...
Yep, I believe a case could be made that he MUST let citizens post on his twitter feed.
Some yall may remember a couple months ago Bernie Sanders blocked me on FaceBook. I emailed his office with a reminder of that exact ruling telling them I really felt no desire to sue him but felt that he should be made aware of the precedent that was already set.
Within days I was unblocked.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:44 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
I don't want to silence those with different opinions than my own. I just don't want a fricking Trump tweet to be the modern assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand.
Of course you want Twitter to silence him, you are simply too cowardly to just come out and say it.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:44 pm to Salmon
quote:
that case isn't saying what you think it says
Sure it is. I understand that you are focused on the major aspect of it which is a person being banned from a political figure's social media, but you need to understand how the judge could rule in that manner.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:46 pm to MButterfly
quote:
Sure it is. I understand that you are focused on the major aspect of it which is a person being banned from a political figure's social media, but you need to understand how the judge could rule in that manner.
You don't understand anything. That case does not apply here.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:47 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
If he didn't tweet the things he tweeted, I wouldn't care. But when you are putting our country at risk and dragging our image through the mud, time to go.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:48 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
If he didn't tweet the things he tweeted, I wouldn't care. But when you are putting our country at risk and dragging our image through the mud, time to go.
I don't give a rat's arse about your reasoning. You said " I don't want Trump silenced" but it's clear you do.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:49 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Context.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:50 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
Context.
Irrelevant here. I already conceded that I don't care about your reasoning. You lied when you said you didn't want Trump silenced. You very badly want him silenced. You are simply a coward who won't post the words "I want Trump banned from Twitter" even though it is clear that you do.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:51 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
I want Trump banned from twitter. I also have legitimate reasons for this that add context to this.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:52 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
I want Trump banned from twitter. I also have legitimate reasons for this that add context to this.
Twitter came out last month and said his tweets do not violate their rules....
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:52 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
I want Trump banned from twitter.
but why would Twitter want Trump banned?
quote:
I also have legitimate reasons for this that add context to this.
do you honestly think banning Trump from Twitter would have any affect on his language or communication?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:53 pm to texag7
That was before he threatened a nuclear power on twitter. Granted he was returning a threat they already made, it still isn't a smart thing to do.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:53 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
wrong
you are just stupid.
LOL!
quote:
If you read the ruling , the judge did not rule that anyone had a right to post on Facebook, what he did rule was that the woman had a right to post on a Congress member's face books page.
Now in your mind process how the judge got to that point. There is a reason. Why should a person have the right to POST on somebody else's Facebook page? Are you forced to allow people access to your facebook page that you don't want on your page?
You are about to see the Gov regulate social media just like all other forms of media. But that is a different story.
quote:
If Facebook had banned her, the same Judge would have said "tough shite" because Facebook is not a government agent whereas the Congress member is.
No... that's wrong. A congressman or woman is entitled to privacy. You don't have a right to 100% access to a public official's life.
quote:
I just can't even believe such a simple concept would have to be explained to an adult.
Agreed!
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:53 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
If he didn't tweet the things he tweeted, I wouldn't care. But when you are putting our country at risk and dragging our image through the mud, time to go.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:54 pm to AggieDub14
quote:
That was before he threatened a nuclear power on twitter.
link?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:54 pm to Salmon
They don't because he drives traffic to their site and no it wouldn't. But it would be hilarious to see his and his supporters reactions.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:54 pm to Salmon
quote:
quote:
what he did rule was that the woman had a right to post on a Congress member's face books page.
Her personal page... not official page..
quote:
which is interesting considering Trump has banned people from his account...
And he could lose in court. Lawsuits have already been filed.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 2:55 pm to MButterfly
quote:
No... that's wrong. A congressman or woman is entitled to privacy. You don't have a right to 100% access to a public official's life.
Yeah. You don't understand that case at all.
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News