Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:25 am to
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Yeah. No one forces them to have sex—an act that has a specific, scientific purpose of cause the “unwanted” pregnancy.
Correct and it is 100% effective except to the little dimwit OP.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74729 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:25 am to
Because what's deemed "convenient" for the mother is inconvenient AF for the person being murdered because she literally can't even, right now.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464910 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

But apparently not gestation

this is just an idiosyncratic, subjective distinction

just like how you're trying to argue that it's not a person, at least at a certain part during gestation
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Good luck building real policy on something that won't happen.
says he person that wants to ban guns.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:26 am to
quote:


your dishonest ilk make me feel bad saying i'm pro choice


Agree.

They get their marching orders and that's it. I've never seen a group of people like the new left that just follow the party no matter what. They'll march off a cliff to certain death if their dem masters said they needed to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

That's not what even remotely equivalent


It's exactly equivalent.

quote:

A mother doesn't have to "give up" anything in order to carry a child.




quote:

What the laws against abortion are attempting to do is to prevent a woman from taking action against another human being to end its life.


At the expense of her own bodily autonomy, saying that its rights supersede hers.

quote:

It would be more equivalent to shooting the person who needs the liver in the head.


No, it would be equivalent to the state forcing you to give someone a kidney so that they could live, even if you chose not to. Because in your mind their right to live supersedes your right to bodily autonomy.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

They get their marching orders and that's it. I've never seen a group of people like the new left that just follow the party no matter what. They'll march off a cliff to certain death if their dem masters said they needed to
She is enslaved. Poor dear doesn't even realize it.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
73772 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:27 am to
Don't be stupid.
This is about two bodies not one.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:28 am to
quote:

You were asked, and choose not to answer. Why is that?
Because, I’ve already demonstrated the failed premise behind it. The term autonomy does not apply.

Not explain how I can be forced to provide labor and wages earned solely by using my bodily autonomy can be forcibly used to provide life-saving care to others?

Is that not your position on socialized medicine?
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:28 am to
Babies develop touch receptors and can feel pain at an average of 8 weeks. Bamaatl doesn't want to play it safe at a 6 week cut off. Bamaatl loves babies being painfully eviscerated
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

this isn't a legal standard


Then why can't the state force you to give up a kidney to save a life any time it wants?
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:29 am to


Cowards going to coward
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
74729 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

She is enslaved.


"Enslaved", terminal mind virus... Are they any different, at the end of the day?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

It used to happen when abortion wasn't an option.


When people had 15 children, and 10 died before adulthood?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Try not paying your taxes and see if they are optional.


Which is why I said taxes are part of the social contract. You live in a country that builds roads and shite, you pay for it.

Obviously.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
124827 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to
You can make up to $1426 per month - post Modified Adjusted Gross Income (141% of the FPL) as a single person and still qualify for free contraception through Medicaid Plan First - an Alabama Medicaid program.

Medicaid Plan First covers:
A yearly family planning exam
Care support from a social worker or nurse
Some types of birth control such as, birth control pills and Depo-Provera shots
Tubal ligation (tube tying) for women 21 years or older
Lab work such as, testing for pregnancy and STDs
Help in planning when to have a baby

You fricking moron.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to
quote:

"Enslaved", terminal mind virus... Are they any different, at the end of the day?
Nope, she can't think for herself. Probably gets her talking points daily. Has absolutely zero substance to her points and cannot provide proof of anything.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
464910 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Then why can't the state force you to give up a kidney to save a life any time it wants?


this question only works in your warped view of "autonomy" when a woman is pregnant, because you want to try as hard as you can to deny what the "parasite" is in her body.

the real question you have is, "God, why do only women have to carry babies? IT'S NOT FAIR!"
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 11:31 am
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62176 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:31 am to
Yes. Those people were married and wanted to be fruitful and multiply, and get some help on the farm. They weren't welfare queens who just liked to get fricked
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Why does that mean the fetus has less rights than another human?


Because you can't force one human to give up fundamental rights to bodily autonomy to sustain another.

You can't force someone to give up a kidney to another person so that the latter will live.
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19 20 21 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram