- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
When a conspiracy theory grows up (Alex Berenson)
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:25 am
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:25 am
AB Tweet
Jeremy Farrar chairman of Wellcome Trust, a "charitable" foundation for medical research in London
Big Question is, "Why is he leading this group of people?" AND "What were desired outcomes?"
Kristian Anderson- emailed Fauci about the how the virus looked engineered, then flip flopped.
Washington Examiner link
Christian Drosten- PCR test creator for SARS-COV2 (German Virologist)
Tony Fauci- (American Bureaucrat)
Paul Schreier- UK, COO at Wellcome, Chief Executive Officer of Hakluyt & Company (Brennan CIA, PsyOp associated firm), McKinsey & Co’s.
Sign of The Times link
Eddie Holmes- co authored paper with Kristian Anderson on how SARS COV2 looked engineered (Australian Virologist)
I don't know all of the people on the list. I just find it odd these cats from all over the world were on this as collaborating on outcomes. Were these the guys that signed off on the PCR test so quickly and set the limits?
Jeremy Farrar chairman of Wellcome Trust, a "charitable" foundation for medical research in London
Big Question is, "Why is he leading this group of people?" AND "What were desired outcomes?"
Kristian Anderson- emailed Fauci about the how the virus looked engineered, then flip flopped.
quote:
Fauci had forwarded the article to Farrar and Andersen on Jan. 31, 2020, saying, “This just came out today. You may have seen it. If not, it is of interest to the current discussion.” Andersen noted that he and Holmes were quoted in the “great” piece and suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 genome looked strange for a natural virus, replying, “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered. … I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change.”
Washington Examiner link
Christian Drosten- PCR test creator for SARS-COV2 (German Virologist)
Tony Fauci- (American Bureaucrat)
Paul Schreier- UK, COO at Wellcome, Chief Executive Officer of Hakluyt & Company (Brennan CIA, PsyOp associated firm), McKinsey & Co’s.
quote:
Interestingly Downer - the source of the Papadopoulos intel, and Halper - who conned Papadopoulos months later, are linked through UK-based Haklyut & Co. an opposition research and intelligence firm - founded by three former British intelligence operatives in 1995 to provide the kind of otherwise inaccessible research for which select governments and Fortune 500 corporations pay huge sums.
Sign of The Times link
Eddie Holmes- co authored paper with Kristian Anderson on how SARS COV2 looked engineered (Australian Virologist)
I don't know all of the people on the list. I just find it odd these cats from all over the world were on this as collaborating on outcomes. Were these the guys that signed off on the PCR test so quickly and set the limits?
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:52 am to RemyLeBeau
When this all plays out, the limits that were set, and how they arrived at that value will be huge.
How did they decide?
Who decided? Why?
When did they know the value was wrong? And how long did it take to make the adjustment?
Why is the testing different if one has been vaccinated?
So many questions that are going to be hard for them to explain. Unfortunately, our media won't do the investigating.
How did they decide?
Who decided? Why?
When did they know the value was wrong? And how long did it take to make the adjustment?
Why is the testing different if one has been vaccinated?
So many questions that are going to be hard for them to explain. Unfortunately, our media won't do the investigating.
Posted on 6/10/21 at 10:57 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
When this all plays out, the limits that were set, and how they arrived at that value will be huge.
Nuremberg 2.0: off [ON]
Posted on 6/10/21 at 11:01 am to RemyLeBeau
Dan Bongino has been all over this Story on the Radio and His Podcast. These F'ers knew this shite came from that Lab in Wuhan and are in panic mode to cover it all up.
Posted on 6/10/21 at 11:03 am to deathvalleytiger10
Trump for it?
Be against it.
That’s how science is done.
Be against it.
That’s how science is done.
This post was edited on 6/10/21 at 11:04 am
Posted on 6/10/21 at 11:49 am to RemyLeBeau
Damn. This is getting closer to a real life V for Vendetta situation than I thought.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News