- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What will constitute censorship and actionable editorializing
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:30 pm
In a post CDA 230 world?
Will it be an admin of a site deleting a thread simply because he doesn’t like the topic or the poster who created it?
How will we determine damages?
Will board ownership be liable for the actions of their volunteer moderators or will the moderators be personally liable?
It’s going to be a strange new world soon
Will it be an admin of a site deleting a thread simply because he doesn’t like the topic or the poster who created it?
How will we determine damages?
Will board ownership be liable for the actions of their volunteer moderators or will the moderators be personally liable?
It’s going to be a strange new world soon
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:31 pm
6
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:31 pm to boosiebadazz
(no message)
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:33 pm to lsuguy84
Will you have to post a bond to be a volunteer moderator?
Who will underwrite that bond for your (presumed) personal liability for the editorial and now actionable decisions you make?
Is it even worth the risk at that point? Will non-corporate owned sites be able to afford the staffing and insurance for paid moderators under the course and scope umbrella?
Who will underwrite that bond for your (presumed) personal liability for the editorial and now actionable decisions you make?
Is it even worth the risk at that point? Will non-corporate owned sites be able to afford the staffing and insurance for paid moderators under the course and scope umbrella?
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Would an actionable editorial decision that lead to a lawsuit give rise to an unmasking of all volunteer moderators?
Would the predilections and prejudices of those moderators then be imparted onto the site itself?
Would the predilections and prejudices of those moderators then be imparted onto the site itself?
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:41 pm to boosiebadazz
Do terms of service create a contract between the user and the owner?
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:42 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
It’s going to be a strange new world soon
It's all a shitshow, and it'll be a dumpster fire if the dems win the White House. Especially if they hold one of the houses, too.
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:48 pm to TerryDawg03
Does the cost of litigation defending suits without a 230 defense to the suit serve as a barrier to entry for forums trying to get off the ground?
In trying to protect speech do we send up stifling forums for speech and funneling internet speech to silos of agreement or deep enough pockets?
In trying to protect speech do we send up stifling forums for speech and funneling internet speech to silos of agreement or deep enough pockets?
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:54 pm to boosiebadazz
Karla, NIH, any of the smart guys?
No thoughts here?
Probably still researching the Roger Stone trial and poring through your highlighted and earmarked copy of the Mueller Report for that deleted thread
No thoughts here?
Probably still researching the Roger Stone trial and poring through your highlighted and earmarked copy of the Mueller Report for that deleted thread
This post was edited on 7/11/20 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:55 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 7/11/20 at 11:57 pm to boosiebadazz
Hmm. Openly daring the admins to hit him with the banhammer.
:boldstrategycottongif:
:boldstrategycottongif:
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:00 am to Godfather1
Seems to be a political topic in light of the recent EO regarding social media?
Seems pertinent in light of a thread of mine being deleted earlier with no explanation of what board rule I broke.
But a great segue into a larger conservation about what message boards look like in the future
Seems pertinent in light of a thread of mine being deleted earlier with no explanation of what board rule I broke.
But a great segue into a larger conservation about what message boards look like in the future
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:02 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
thread of mine being deleted earlier with no explanation of what board rule I broke.
Yeah, you came across as trolling to me. Not one of your better efforts, mind you, but I didn’t get the deletion, either. I’ve seen more obvious troll threads stay up.
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 12:05 am
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:07 am to Godfather1
It wasn’t a troll thread. Predictably not many addressed the substance and instead turned to personal attacks, but I somehow how got penalized for pointing that out.
The Parscale guy and a few others addressed the OP but we all got punished for _____.
But it does raise a larger question about what a post-230 world looks like.
Should I be able to sue tigerdroppings for the editorial decision their agent made in deleting the thread and get past an initial exception due to their being no Section 230 immunity (motion to dismiss the suit before it gets started)?
I think that’s a dangerous and slippery slope to go down, but it seems we have some here who want to see what that looks like
The Parscale guy and a few others addressed the OP but we all got punished for _____.
But it does raise a larger question about what a post-230 world looks like.
Should I be able to sue tigerdroppings for the editorial decision their agent made in deleting the thread and get past an initial exception due to their being no Section 230 immunity (motion to dismiss the suit before it gets started)?
I think that’s a dangerous and slippery slope to go down, but it seems we have some here who want to see what that looks like
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 12:09 am
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:08 am to boosiebadazz
I am partial to the argument that the first amendment and how it has already been interpreted by the courts makes 230 redundant and unnecessary. I think that if it is revoked it won't end up mattering in the long run, because the supreme court will basically rule that the first amendment provides those protections already.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 12:09 am
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:10 am to frogglet
quote:
I am partial to the argument that the first amendment and how it has already been interpreted by the courts makes 230 redundant and unnecessary. I think that if it is revoked it won't end up mattering in the long run, because the supreme court will basically rule that the first amendment provides those protections already.
So is it antitrust that we can hope levels the playing field somewhat?
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
It wasn’t a troll thread.
You’ll just have to excuse me. You’re a known quantity.
quote:
Should I be able to sue tigerdroppings for the editorial decision their agent made in deleting the thread and get past an initial exception due to their being no Section 230 immunity (motion to dismiss the suit before it gets started)?
Knock yourself out. See how far it gets you.
This post was edited on 7/12/20 at 12:12 am
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:20 am to boosiebadazz
And just like that...your thread’s back up.
With a lock on it. But back up, nevertheless.
With a lock on it. But back up, nevertheless.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:24 am to Godfather1
I don’t see it?
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:25 am to boosiebadazz
Last response from me @ 11:22 pm.
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:27 am to Godfather1
Oh, wow. Anchored and locked. This one is anchored too.
Bastion of civil discourse and exchange of competing ideas here
Bastion of civil discourse and exchange of competing ideas here
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News