Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What if Greenland Isn’t Denmark’s to Sell?

Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:10 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:10 pm
Wording found in the 1916 Treaty of the Danish West Indies could help justify an American claim to Greenland.

quote:

It turns out that, in order to establish sovereignty over the world’s largest island, President Trump may not have to purchase Greenland after all. The American explorer Charles Francis Hall claimed this vast land mass (or at least the northern third) for the United States on September 5, 1871.

In the summer of 1916, the U.S. signed an agreement to purchase the Danish West Indies, now known as the U.S. Virgin Islands, for $25 million ($595 million in current dollars). The primary ratification condition for this treaty, a major American concession, read: “that the government of the United States would not object to the Danish Government extending their political and economic interests over the whole of Greenland.”


Note the liminal phrasing: If a nation exercises sovereignty over a given territory, how can it “extend” such control? Can you imagine a similar diplomatic stipulation appearing in a treaty involving Puerto Rico or Guam or any other U.S. territory? The obvious objection is that, when it comes to territories, actual sovereignty is not potential sovereignty.


full report:
https://spectator.org/what-if-greenland-isnt-denmarks-to-sell/

Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
42090 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:12 pm to
Hes already on record as making a deal. I guess he cannot go back.

But yes, I would rather Greenland be free to choose.

With their green name, red flag and white snow.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99744 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:14 pm to
Although I'm glad there is tremendous progress from the President, personally I would've preferred Greenland hold a referendum vote on who controls them and where their support could/would come from.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 2:31 pm to
quote:


Although I'm glad there is tremendous progress from the President, personally I would've preferred Greenland hold a referendum vote on who controls them and where their support could/would come from.


It's for national security.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:46 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:

Kingdom of Denmark Carla Sands called it a three-way win
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:47 pm to
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:58 pm to
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12761 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:20 pm to
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24930 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

But yes, I would rather Greenland be free to choose.


I think they are free to choose. But they can't choose to let the Chinese and Russians in.We will protect the Arctic in part, from Greenland. And maybe the Danish will be friends with us. Let's see if Trump and the Danes talk at the UN summit. If so, no US news outlet of note will cover it.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
26370 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:34 pm to
If GREENLAND is for sale, then they played us....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram