- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/3/18 at 3:07 pm to bencoleman
Answer OP's question dupe.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 3:08 pm to Jjdoc
I don't know if you're Catholic or not, but so you know ...
Yes, bishops are higher than priests in the clergy but neither are that high in the grand scheme.
Above bishops you have archbishops, then above them you have Cardinals and it is Cardinals who outwardly support their choice for pope as well as help guide Church doctrine.
Is 34 bishops resigning a big deal? No doubt, absolutely. I'm not sure it's cataclysmic to the church however, especially in regards to a scandal that has been ongoing now for a couple of decades.
However, i'm still giving Q the benefit of the doubt on this. You pulled a pretty specific example and if there are more of those out there, especially with regards to US policy, then hot damn.
Yes, bishops are higher than priests in the clergy but neither are that high in the grand scheme.
Above bishops you have archbishops, then above them you have Cardinals and it is Cardinals who outwardly support their choice for pope as well as help guide Church doctrine.
Is 34 bishops resigning a big deal? No doubt, absolutely. I'm not sure it's cataclysmic to the church however, especially in regards to a scandal that has been ongoing now for a couple of decades.
However, i'm still giving Q the benefit of the doubt on this. You pulled a pretty specific example and if there are more of those out there, especially with regards to US policy, then hot damn.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 3:29 pm
Posted on 6/3/18 at 3:59 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
You pulled a pretty specific example and if there are more of those out there
quote:
Prediction In the evening of December 10th, Q’s drop contained the words Blunt & Direct Time. The next one mentioned “false flag(s)” and “fireworks”.
quote:
The next morning, a pipe bomb partially detonated in the New York City Subway’s Times Square–42nd Street/Port Authority Bus Terminal station. The suspected bomber was identified by police as 27-year-old Akayed Ullah, a Salafi Muslim immigrant from Bangladesh. The following evening, Q explained what he meant by “Blunt & Direct Time”.
quote:
BDT is the currency of Bangladesh. Therefore, the crumb implies that Q was aware of the coming “fireworks” and of the nationality of the terrorist.
Link
quote:
An Objective Analysis of the QAnon Phenomenon
On December 10th, Q’s crumb said that they’ve picked out a “special place” for GS (possibly George Soros). On December 17th, Trump posted a tweet using the words “special place” which was interpreted as another clue.
—
quote:
“That’s the Laurel desk. It’s the one that Obama used and apparently Trump is also using at Camp David. That’s the desktop at Camp David. The pen is a Montblanc ink pen that Trump has used for a long time. That’s Camp David over the weekend and that picture had to have been taken by somebody who was there with President Trump. His pen on the desk; that pretty much authenticates that QAnon is very close to Donald Trump and present in some of these really important inner circle White House meetings.”
—
quote:
Consensual Tweet
On January 7th, a Trump tweet contained a mistake where the word “consensual” was used instead of “consequential”.
Although the mistake was corrected a few minutes afterward, it quickly made headlines and was widely ridiculed.
However, according to Q followers, the typo was no accident. The fact that Trump omitted and then added a word with letter Q was interpreted as a message from Trump to Q followers. Q himself added that it was no accident.
—
Note the dates/timing
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:06 pm to ThinePreparedAni
The terrorist wasn’t thwarted at all. His bomb was just a dud. Had he not been inept that would have been wrong. That’s a terrible example.
To thwart a plot means to kill it before it’s executed.
I admit getting a picture of a pen is pretty incredible, but how can we be sure that’s the desk at Camp David? Why not take a bit bigger picture? Would that reveal his cover any more? eta: Actually the picture and tweet are from two totally different weekends. One in December and one in January.
The twitter misspelling was corrected and doesn’t really mean much.
You got me on the picture. I can’t explain that.
To thwart a plot means to kill it before it’s executed.
I admit getting a picture of a pen is pretty incredible, but how can we be sure that’s the desk at Camp David? Why not take a bit bigger picture? Would that reveal his cover any more? eta: Actually the picture and tweet are from two totally different weekends. One in December and one in January.
The twitter misspelling was corrected and doesn’t really mean much.
You got me on the picture. I can’t explain that.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:07 pm to bencoleman
If you can't debate respectfully why do it at all. Come on, you're better than this. It's all about evidence.
Perhaps you can give a list of a few key terms (including non-common words) that could be put into a site specific google search on tigerdroppings, or perhaps a Q fan blog that lists his hits and misses?
Perhaps you can give a list of a few key terms (including non-common words) that could be put into a site specific google search on tigerdroppings, or perhaps a Q fan blog that lists his hits and misses?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:17 pm to Mephistopheles
quote:
you can't debate respectfully why do it at all. Come on, you're better than this. It's all about evidence
The information you seek is in the Q thread. The first couple of pages are updated summaries. My contempt is for people that refuse to look for themselves and expect others pick out information for them. I put in the time so can you and if you can't or won't how can you criticize?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:19 pm to bencoleman
People aren’t criticizing you for being a Q follower. They are criticizing you for coming in here, trolling people like me, and not providing data.
Do you have any data like your fellow posters? Would love to check it out.
Do you have any data like your fellow posters? Would love to check it out.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:24 pm to ThinePreparedAni
So many crumbs. Still waiting for his prediction of the Hillary perp walk or whatever it was.Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:25 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
People aren’t criticizing you for being a Q follower. They are criticizing you for coming in here, trolling people like me, and not providing data.
Do you have any data like your fellow posters? Would love to check it out
I'm not talking about criticizing me? I don't particularly care one way or another. I was talking about the Q thread and Qposters in general. As far as information I just told you that the first couple of pages are summaries. I haven't trolled anything you are much closer to that than me. Now either go look at the first couple of pages or GFY I don't care which.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:28 pm to bencoleman
I don’t want a vague summary, I want evidence to support the summary. None of which is provided in the first few posts in that thread.
Like your fellow posters, would you mind pulling some Q posts and showing how they revealed plans or predicted events?
Like your fellow posters, would you mind pulling some Q posts and showing how they revealed plans or predicted events?
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:31 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Like your fellow posters, would you mind pulling some Q posts and showing how they revealed plans or predicted events
Yes I mind GFY.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:38 pm to bencoleman
Dude, why are you so angry? I've just asked questions.
In this thread you've called me ignorant, called my posts pathetic and told me to go frick myself. What's the problem?
All i've asked is for evidence. I haven't been a dick to you or anyone in this thread. No reason to lash out.
Thine has done a good job of putting some easy evidence out there to digest, even if i disagree with some of it. Jjdoc has done a good job too.
In this thread you've called me ignorant, called my posts pathetic and told me to go frick myself. What's the problem?
All i've asked is for evidence. I haven't been a dick to you or anyone in this thread. No reason to lash out.
Thine has done a good job of putting some easy evidence out there to digest, even if i disagree with some of it. Jjdoc has done a good job too.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:40 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
https://qanon.pub
Start at the bottom (top is most recent)
You can decide for yourself by reading his posts
They’re pretty short
Start at the bottom (top is most recent)
You can decide for yourself by reading his posts
They’re pretty short
Posted on 6/3/18 at 4:46 pm to berrycajun
Thanks berry!
I’ve been looking for something like that. Really easy to follow.
I’ve been looking for something like that. Really easy to follow.
This post was edited on 6/3/18 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 6/3/18 at 5:36 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 5:25 am
Posted on 6/3/18 at 7:58 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
A lot but a really good one that involved no word creativity was his telling us in March that the pope would have a bad May. Then all the Chilean Bishops resigned. An article came out saying that the Vatican was concerned about videos coming out of someone who LOOKED like the Pope. The article desperately explained how with technology these days, such dakning videos can be faked. Then the pope hinted at his possible retiring like Benedict (he’s bad too btw) and I’m Catholic. I’m not saying Catholicism is bad. I believe the Vatican was infiltrated by evil a long time ago, however. Our chatechism and the church herself will forever remain pure though.
Posted on 6/3/18 at 8:18 pm to berrycajun
What about US policy? I don’t think people follow Q because of his/their connection to the pope. At least not as closely as they do.
Posted on 6/4/18 at 9:22 am to ThinePreparedAni
Does anyone else have anything to add before I let the thread die?
Posted on 6/4/18 at 10:52 am to GeorgeTheGreek
Yall help me out here. What is Q Anon, and where can I read their stuff (other than going to an abysmal place like 4Chan)?
Page 9 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News