- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are your reasons for believing climate change is "a hoax"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:29 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:29 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Awwww. A single-variable climate model. You’re so cute.
If you could show that, for example, radiative forcing of CO2 and other greenhouse gases emitted by humans was not a driver of climate, then problem solved. No global warming.
quote:
That's why the opposite is shown
No. quote:What theory is that exactly?
and you believe in a conspiracy theory.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:30 pm
2
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:32 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Awwww. A single-variable climate model. You’re so cute.
Yeah
But it beats "I can count"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:32 pm to Tridentds
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:38 pm to ShortyRob
Post any evidence that CO2 is bad for plants. Its retarded
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Its actually more insidious. People think it’s “scientific”. It’s about as scientific as saying that since aspirin cures headaches, it’s a good cure for a brain tumor.
But it beats "I can count"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:40 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Its actually more insidious. People think it’s “scientific”.
Oh. I get that he tries to play the Spidey, "let me show I'm smart" game when you know he's just cutting and pasting from climate sites or simply hoping to ward off non-scientific people from responding.
But, I can work with that in terms of rebuttal.
"Muh, more people" isn't even an argument.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:41 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I can't help you comprehend English
No, you can't. You can hardly make a rational point.
I don't really care enough about your position to actually read your posts, I just think shite you says is inadvertently funny a lot of the time.
Like here:
quote:
I pull Wheat Cents out of my penny jar and call it "Finance"!!1!
LINK
You've confessed to having your IQ reduced every time you read one of my posts. Keep it up.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:42 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Awwww. A single-variable climate model.
Go ahead and show us your multi-variable model that shows humans aren't a source of warming.
Because there are models that say you're full of shite...
quote:
What theory is that exactly
That global warming is some global scientific hoax.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:44 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:I'm honored. I've seen what you think is rational.
No, you can't. You can hardly make a rational point.
quote:
I don't really care enough about your position to actually read your posts,
So you admit you approached from ignorance. Thanks.
quote:Well, that will happen when you don't read as you admit above you don't.
I just think shite you says is inadvertently funny a lot of the time.
quote:I don't even know what you think that link shows. You have a problem with my source of income?
I pull Wheat Cents out of my penny jar and call it "Finance"!!1!
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:44 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Exceptional rebuttal
Longer rebuttal:
If you think that funding for a study that would have a null hypothesis that the earth isn't warming from anthropogenic causes (or isn't warming in an aberrant way compared to historical trends) would only be funded by fossil fuel companies - and that was the premise of your 'point', let's not forget - then you lack basic comprehension around research funding and grant proposal processes as to render your opinion on the subject meaningless.
tl;dr That's not how this works
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:45 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Go ahead and show us your multi-variable model that shows humans aren't a source of warming.
This is wild - so, force the other side to prove a negative or accept their blatantly religious belief system?
Okay, I can play:
Show us your multi-variable model that proves there is no God and that Jesus Christ didn't make Peter the leader of the church or start going to communion, baw. (Or guh - or however you choose to self-identify.)
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:45 pm to CptRusty
quote:
100% of Christians believe that Jesus was the divine son of a deity, and that eternal damnation awaits those whose sins are grievous enough
The difference is that Christians have no empirical, rigorous data to back up their beliefs. They're just taking it on faith.
Climate scientists do have such data. They don't need to take it on faith, they can run the numbers.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:46 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Its your claim, it’s your burden. Show us one that does. And good luck to you. They foldmks at UCAR, UEA, and PSU have yet to produce. But maybe you know something they don’t.
Go ahead and show us your multi-variable model that shows humans aren't a source of warming.
quote:
Because there are models that say you're full of shite...
Nope. quote:Where did I make that claim?
That global warming is some global scientific hoax.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:49 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Gotcha. I think if it in Dunning -Krueger terms. They actually think they are more correct (science by proxy!!) than the intelligence by proxy crowd. So they dig in even harder.
Oh. I get that he tries to play the Spidey, "let me show I'm smart" game when you know he's just cutting and pasting from climate sites or simply hoping to ward off non-scientific people from responding.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:49 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
This is wild - so, force the other side to prove a negative or accept their blatantly religious belief system?
If you're going to discount something that's been proven to be true in the opposite sense, then yes. You'll need data.
quote:
Show us your multi-variable model that proves there is no God and that Jesus Christ didn't make Peter the leader of the church
And there's your main problem - you don't understand the difference between science and religion. Maybe some day you will, and you'll be better for it. But today is obviously not that day.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:50 pm to Tiger Lake
quote:
The earth's climate has been "changing" for 4.5 billions years. This is a fact. The conspiracy is that the liberals think that by taxing and redistributing my wealth, they can change this.
/EoT
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:51 pm to BamaAtl
quote:I bet “try to prove a negative” sounded a lot smarter in your head than it did after you posted it.
would have a null hypothesis that the earth isn't warming from anthropogenic causes
quote:Indeed!!
That's not how this works
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:52 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
And there's your main problem - you don't understand the difference between science and religion. Maybe some day you will, and you'll be better for it. But today is obviously not that day.
In other words, you can't. Got it.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:52 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:Or a better example... prove BamaATL isn’t a child molester.
This is wild - so, force the other side to prove a negative or accept their blatantly religious belief system?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:53 pm to BamaAtl
quote:So compliant. So well programmed.
Climate scientists do have such data.
Page 28 of 40
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News