- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are your reasons for believing climate change is "a hoax"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:06 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:06 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Which to powerman means “they are conservatives”.
What he doesn’t realize is many like myself once “believed” in it. It sounds reasonable. The you start digging in and.... there are serious technical problems with theory and the work of those
what's funny is, Pman not only dismisses anyone on the board as "not a scientist" but also dismisses ALL actual scientists who don't toe the line.
But what do we expect from a guy who has now repeatedly used the 97% number that even the climate people admit is debunked and was based on flawed methodology.
Basically, Pman's sum total of knowledge isn't even "I know cause smart people told me".
It's, "I know because CNN told me what smart people said".
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:08 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
What he doesn’t realize is many like myself once “believed” in it. It sounds reasonable. The you start digging in and.... there are serious technical problems with theory and the work of those promo
I should add that it's funny because Pman acts like at least learning enough to understand the scientific pitch doesn't require one to be a climate scientist.
He could at least go to THAT much effort.
But, I guess that squeezes in to his Grand Theft Auto time. So. Just count.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:09 pm to Powerman
quote:
Because it's a valid point.
quote:
Take a basic logic class and get back to us once you figure out what you’re doing.
This thread is classic Dunning-Krueger. He’s al(apparently) incapable of understanding his own error. So he presumed he’s right and digs in further.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:09 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Curiously, you don’t list “learn the f*cking science” as a rational option. That’s telling.
quote:
ZERO of my arguments for my concerns have been science based.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:11 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
WildTchoupitoulas
What's funny is that you cut and pasted those without knowing the conversation.
So. What you think is a gotcha actually illustrated my point.
About what I expected from ya.
Thanks.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:12 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Politicians love people like this. They are the ones that vote for the candidate they expect to win. To be “on the right side of history”. Or some such bs.
Then....he literally argues that attempting to evaluate and form your own opinions is an example of stupidity.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:13 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Intelligence by proxy.
Now, I realize he's just a fairly pedestrian intellect who thinks agreeing with smart people makes him smart.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:13 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
This thread is classic Dunning-Krueger. He’s al(apparently) incapable of understanding his own error. So he presumed he’s right and digs in further.
hell. He probably thinks he's figured out why the logical fallacy ISN'T one.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:14 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
It's fun when people use a rhetorical approach that they seem to think is unique that everyone else has already seen in Jr High debate club.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:17 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
It's fun when people use a rhetorical approach that they seem to think is unique that everyone else has already seen in Jr High debate club.
It's funny cause, if I'm being honest, I occasionally use that particular rhetorical approach too. But that's just because an amazing number of people are stupid enough to fall for it.
But when they don't, you're supposed to have the intellectual wherewithal to bow out of it.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:17 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Not even the same person
What's funny is that you cut and pasted those without knowing the conversation.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:18 pm to Powerman
quote:
When did I say that?
shite I don't know, 5 years ago during a discussion on shrimp treadmills or some such nonsense.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:19 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
If the ONLY place you can get funded to do research counter to the dogma is the fossil fuel companies
It's not, idiot.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:20 pm to Powerman
quote:
If 97% of climate scientists think that man made climate change is real is that standard of proof too low for you?
100% of Christians believe that Jesus was the divine son of a deity, and that eternal damnation awaits those whose sins are grievous enough. Is this across the board consensus on the subject sufficient to convince you that these suppositions are true?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:21 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
existence of warming does not establish causality.
Not warming due to anthropogenic effects - sorry for not spelling it out for you, I assumed you were at least versed in the basics here.
If you could show that, for example, radiative forcing of CO2 and other greenhouse gases emitted by humans was not a driver of climate, then problem solved. No global warming.
That's why the opposite is shown, and you believe in a conspiracy theory.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:22 pm to Powerman
quote:
s pointed out earlier this was a creation from the Bush administration.
umm... there is this guy named Al Gore.
You might want to look him up.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
without knowing the conversation.
There is no such thing as an AGW "conversation" on the Poli board - which is exemplified by your appeal to ignorance of science as you attempt to make a 'point'.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:25 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
There is no such thing as an AGW "conversation" on the Poli board - which is exemplified by your appeal to ignorance of science as you attempt to make a 'point'.
Swing and another miss. I can't help you comprehend English. I can only point you in the right direction.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:25 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's not, idiot.
Exceptional rebuttal
Idiot
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:27 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Not warming due to anthropogenic effects - sorry for not spelling it out for you, I assumed you were at least versed in the basics here.
If you could show that, for example, radiative forcing of CO2 and other greenhouse gases emitted by humans was not a driver of climate, then problem solved. No global warming.
See Pman
BamaAtl is full of shite..........but at least Bama ain't making the "duh......um, look......I can count" argument.
Popular
Back to top


0




