- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What are the implications of Federal Home Loan Banks seeking $64 Billion?
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 3/13/23 at 3:59 pm to Supravol22
From wiki:
Sounds like these FHLBanks got themselves in a bind with treasuries under the "hold until maturity" accounting designation too. Apparently the hold until maturity designation allows these banks to avoid unrealized gains and losses until maturity but on the other hand it ties up assets, makes them illiquid. So when depositors want their money (withdrawals) they have to seek money from other sources because most of their assets are tied up on hold until maturity assets. Thus the issuance of $64 billion in short term notes.
They timing of the notes must be based on the fact that these "hold until maturity" assets can be redesignated and become liquid.
What is happening is depositors are withdrawing money from banks paying shitty interest rates and buying treasuries paying much higher interest rates.
quote:
The Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks, or FHLBank System) are 11 U.S. government-sponsored banks that provide liquidity to the members of financial institutions to support housing finance and community investment.
Sounds like these FHLBanks got themselves in a bind with treasuries under the "hold until maturity" accounting designation too. Apparently the hold until maturity designation allows these banks to avoid unrealized gains and losses until maturity but on the other hand it ties up assets, makes them illiquid. So when depositors want their money (withdrawals) they have to seek money from other sources because most of their assets are tied up on hold until maturity assets. Thus the issuance of $64 billion in short term notes.
They timing of the notes must be based on the fact that these "hold until maturity" assets can be redesignated and become liquid.
What is happening is depositors are withdrawing money from banks paying shitty interest rates and buying treasuries paying much higher interest rates.
Posted on 3/13/23 at 4:18 pm to GumboPot
There are a group of globalist who are doing everything they can to destroy the US Dollar.
May they all rot in hell.
May they all rot in hell.
Popular
Back to top
2







