- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We need to clean up Senate "Intelligence committee
Posted on 4/21/20 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 4/21/20 at 6:49 pm
Still going on and on about Russia. New report saying they interfered in election.
McConnell needs to shut this shite down.
The Swamp Strikes Back
4
Posted on 4/21/20 at 6:52 pm to crescentcity
quote:
Richard Burr
How is this a-hole not getting fricked?
Posted on 4/21/20 at 6:52 pm to crescentcity
What are your substantive disagreements with the report?
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:07 pm to boosiebadazz
It’s that the “bi-partisan Senate” committee is saying the Russia information is not.
We already know these were lies.
And the committee is not bi partisan. They’re basically one party now the Republican Lite/ Democrat party.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:12 pm to crescentcity
AXIOS ran an article on this as well
quote:
Worth noting: The report finds that U.S. intelligence agencies did not use information from the infamous Steele dossier to support its findings. The dossier was included in a highly classified annex to the assessment, which was in line with President Obama's directive.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:22 pm to RemyLeBeau
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:53 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What are your substantive disagreements with the report?
It is thoroughly unnecessary and a waste of time and a distraction from them ever doing a God damned thing about the attempted coup.
Is that "substantive" enough?
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:55 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What are your substantive disagreements with the report?
It accepted any work product of known liar John Brennan.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 7:55 pm to gthog61
No, it’s actually completely and absolutely non-responsive to my question.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 9:05 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
No, it’s actually completely and absolutely non-responsive to my question.
Putin wanted to help Trump, Trump stooge of Putin, muh:
quote:
The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.
Tuesday's bipartisan report, from a panel chaired by North Carolina Republican Richard Burr, undercuts Trump's years of efforts to portray allegations of Kremlin assistance to his campaign as a "hoax," driven by Democrats and a “deep state” embedded within the government bureaucracy.
Politico
The Sen. Intel Committee, Burr trying to be one last cuck probably, left some unredacted cherry-picked Trump Collusion fantasy porn from a nearly 70% redacted report from the Senate Intel Committee implying that the ICA found that Putin favored Trump was legit.
Apparently, it is way more nuanced than that.
From what I gathered in hurried reading between SBA applications/calls/status update attempts, was that they were saying that the initial intel assessment was adequate for reasonable minds to differ over such a conclusion.
But enough to place Trump back into being a Putin Puppet MSM narrative I guess.
Good thing is, way to nuanced for most twatter trolls and collusion-a-philes.
undercover huber twatter
This post was edited on 4/21/20 at 9:06 pm
Posted on 4/21/20 at 9:44 pm to crescentcity
oh no, democracy.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 10:01 pm to CelticDog
quote:
oh no, democracy.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 10:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:Seriously? How about 2 years of an SC investigation, 500 witnesses interviewed, 2 congressional hearings and nothing was found. Time to move on.
What are your substantive disagreements with the report?
Posted on 4/21/20 at 10:14 pm to PhDoogan
I wonder if China will be held to the same standards as Russia in 2016.
They currently favor one candidate, the one who they did billion dollar deals with his son, not the one who made them bend the knee over tariffs.
They are currently spreading disinformation online through CCP propaganda and social media bots to smear Trump.
When will the investigations begin?
They currently favor one candidate, the one who they did billion dollar deals with his son, not the one who made them bend the knee over tariffs.
They are currently spreading disinformation online through CCP propaganda and social media bots to smear Trump.
When will the investigations begin?
Posted on 4/21/20 at 10:18 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
What are your substantive disagreements with the report?
For starters, the dossier was complete crap
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News