- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:35 am to the808bass
quote:
And to wrap up the argument, can they get information from foreign nationals? Yes.
Well I’d say it depends on what the information is. FEC does consider that some information can constitute a “contribution.”
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:37 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So what's the problem with trumps comment?
Didn’t see? Trump changed his mind. Would now turn in any info from another country. No need to defend anymore
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:38 am to Decatur
quote:
Well I’d say it depends on what the information is. FEC does consider that some information can constitute a “contribution
But neither is "foreign intrusion into our elections" correct?
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:41 am to Decatur
quote:
Well I’d say it depends on what the information is. FEC does consider that some information can constitute a “contribution.”
quote:LINK
Federal Election Commission (FEC) Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub said Thursday it is illegal to accept foreign assistance during elections after President Trump publicly suggested he would accept foreign intelligence on opponents. "I would not have thought that I needed to say this," Weintraub tweeted Thursday with her statement. "Let me make something 100 percent clear to the American public and anyone running for public office: It is illegal for any person to solicit, accept, or receive anything of value from a foreign national in connection with a U.S. election," Weintraub said.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:44 am to Decatur
quote:
Well I’d say it depends on what the information is. FEC does consider that some information can constitute a “contribution.”
"Contribution" as it's used in the CFR is a complicated matter. See subsection (8).
contribution as described in CFR
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:51 am to davyjones
Everything in that entire subsection is services , money or products.
Stupid libs like Decatur want to redefine everything in the world so that they can authoritatively say "orange man bad"
Stupid libs like Decatur want to redefine everything in the world so that they can authoritatively say "orange man bad"
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:54 am to Turbeauxdog
Same scenario with the left and MSM setting/defining what the "truth" is, so if it doesnt line up with their version of the truth....issa lie.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 10:59 am to Turbeauxdog
What am I redefining?
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:16 am to Reubaltaich
For leftists, the end justifies the means, and by any means necessary is acceptable to them.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:38 am to Jbird
quote:you were the one who first made the positive assertion. What are you doing asking him for a link, nimrod?
So no link.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 11:42 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:must be because trump said he would turn into fbi if it happened. Just changed his mind today
But neither is "foreign intrusion into our elections" correct?
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:10 pm to bmy
You wish.
Problem is, i dont think oppo research is illegal.
Making knowingly fake stories and using dirty intel agency leaders to create a FAKE treason claim against the duly elected president is in itself treason.
Im sorry you are unable to comprehend the difference.
Problem is, i dont think oppo research is illegal.
Making knowingly fake stories and using dirty intel agency leaders to create a FAKE treason claim against the duly elected president is in itself treason.
Im sorry you are unable to comprehend the difference.
This post was edited on 6/14/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:23 pm to Decatur
quote:
Well I’d say it depends on what the information is. FEC does consider that some information can constitute a “contribution.”
Lol
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:36 pm to the808bass
Feel free to look it up.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:51 pm to Decatur
I did. It said, “Decatur is a dumbass.”
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:52 pm to the808bass
Suit yourself I guess
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:56 pm to Decatur
I clicked just to see your imaginative lying
Instead the last page is bullshite and I don’t care about the rest
Of course the dossier is exactly what the Dems are lying about
Instead the last page is bullshite and I don’t care about the rest
Of course the dossier is exactly what the Dems are lying about
Posted on 6/14/19 at 1:34 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
That was legal because of the it was her turn exception
I think it came down to intent. Nobody intended to get caught.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 12:22 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
I'm saying that in this instance, there is publicly available information that indicates that the FISA application was well founded.
For example, you had DoJ appointees from both Obama and Trump admins sign off on multiple re-authorizations.
YIKES
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News