- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WAPO: "The Democrats’ impeachment bombshells aren’t exploding"
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:27 am to Jake88
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:27 am to Jake88
quote:
Why did these imbeciles expect any "bombshells" after seeing multiple garbage accusations fall flat over the last three years?
because they have the media to make up shite
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:29 am to MrLSU
It was never going to have a bombshell. It’s not rooted in fact - even Democrats know it.
This is about grabbing headlines.
This is about grabbing headlines.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:30 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
Damn dude. Your IQ gets lower every day
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:43 am to MrLSU
When they’ve lost WAPO, they’ve really lost. Schitt’s utter humiliation is nearly complete.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:19 am to Centinel
quote:
You have zero understanding of what you're talking about. But then again you never do..
I think it's cute that you didn't think Trump could influence the awarding of the $10 billion DOD contract.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:23 am to texridder
quote:
I think it's cute that you didn't think Trump could influence the awarding of the $10 billion DOD contract.
What the flying frick does this have anything to do with my post or the post of yours I was replying to?
Can you not even follow a simple thread?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:31 am to davyjones
quote:
Are you saying that Eisenberg sought to hide the transcript in an effort to assist Trump?
I'm saying that when it was first reported that the transcript was put on a secure server, the White House responded that placing a call like that on the secure server had no significance because Trump had done it before and so had Obama. Eisenberg would have been involved but it could have been his or someone else's decision.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:35 am to Centinel
quote:
What the flying frick does this have anything to do with my post or the post of yours I was replying to?
Read my post that you're responding to. You should be able to figure it out.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:40 am to Revelator
quote:
There is nothing incriminating in the transcript, so your point is a non story.
Why did they put it on a secure server to begin with? Why did they lie about why it got put on a secure server?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:41 am to gthog61
quote:
because he was using his influence to cover for his son
but he did not do that anyway
So it wasn't the foreign policy of the US?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:41 am to texridder
Muh server sounds almost as pathetic as you believing blassey ford had two front doors
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:42 am to texridder
I know exactly what I'm responding to. Your claim that the meeting notes being put on a classified server is some big fricking conspiracy.
It's clearly obvious you have zero experience or understanding about how and why documents end up in classified environments.
It's clearly obvious you have zero experience or understanding about how and why documents end up in classified environments.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:45 am to MrLSU
Sondland is dropping some bombshells right now. Not looking good for Trump, Giuliani and Pompeo right now. Pence might get dragged into it also.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:51 am to poli_tiger
quote:
Sondland is dropping some bombshells right now.
Ya, the same kind of bombshells that have been dropped the previous three days.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:55 am to Cosmo
quote:
You know its bad when WaPo is abandoning ship
It’s an opinion piece by a Bush staffer / Fox News contributor. Come on now
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:57 am to texridder
This whole thing comes down to why Trump wanted the investigations. He admits he wanted them. The phone records show it and the witnesses say it. But why?
The witnesses agreed the Ukraine was corrupt. Burisma was corrupt and it wouldn’t be beyond their MO to buy influence.
Volker claimed Biden character was above reproach. There have been many honest men that have slipped for less than three million dollars that Hunter was paid. Even you can’t say this doesn’t raise questions.
All that was ever asked was for it to be looked into. He didn’t ask for anything to be manufactured like the Steel dossier was. He had the video of Biden bragging about using his influence to can the prosecutor which is better than any factual information the Obama administration had to spy on candidate Trump.
If this is about a foreign country then Hunter should have worked in the US. The Ukraine would have to at least help investigate a company in the Ukraine.
Even if Sondland assumed there was linkage there has to be proof that the president wanted more than legal honest let the chips fall where they may investigation. The Democrats want to ascribe the worst possible intent to actions that are easily defended. The protection of US Aid from corruption is REQUIRED of the president by law.
I want the Dems to prove they could read his mind. Good luck. TDS is strong in sooooo many people.
The witnesses agreed the Ukraine was corrupt. Burisma was corrupt and it wouldn’t be beyond their MO to buy influence.
Volker claimed Biden character was above reproach. There have been many honest men that have slipped for less than three million dollars that Hunter was paid. Even you can’t say this doesn’t raise questions.
All that was ever asked was for it to be looked into. He didn’t ask for anything to be manufactured like the Steel dossier was. He had the video of Biden bragging about using his influence to can the prosecutor which is better than any factual information the Obama administration had to spy on candidate Trump.
If this is about a foreign country then Hunter should have worked in the US. The Ukraine would have to at least help investigate a company in the Ukraine.
Even if Sondland assumed there was linkage there has to be proof that the president wanted more than legal honest let the chips fall where they may investigation. The Democrats want to ascribe the worst possible intent to actions that are easily defended. The protection of US Aid from corruption is REQUIRED of the president by law.
I want the Dems to prove they could read his mind. Good luck. TDS is strong in sooooo many people.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:05 am to gthog61
quote:I was referring to the media when I mentioned "imbeciles."
because they have the media to make up shite
Posted on 11/20/19 at 4:41 pm to Centinel
quote:
It's clearly obvious you have zero experience or understanding about how and why documents end up in classified environments.
That's not my point. Have you always struggled with comprehension?
My point was they first put it on the secure server, defended why it wound up on the secure server for 2 months, and now say it was put on the secure server by mistake. When did they realize it was a mistake?
Popular
Back to top

1








