Started By
Message

re: WAPO: "The Democrats’ impeachment bombshells aren’t exploding"

Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:27 am to
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Why did these imbeciles expect any "bombshells" after seeing multiple garbage accusations fall flat over the last three years?



because they have the media to make up shite
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26410 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:29 am to
It was never going to have a bombshell. It’s not rooted in fact - even Democrats know it.

This is about grabbing headlines.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:30 am to
quote:

texridder


Damn dude. Your IQ gets lower every day
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 7:43 am to
When they’ve lost WAPO, they’ve really lost. Schitt’s utter humiliation is nearly complete.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:19 am to
quote:

You have zero understanding of what you're talking about. But then again you never do..


I think it's cute that you didn't think Trump could influence the awarding of the $10 billion DOD contract.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44224 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:23 am to
quote:


I think it's cute that you didn't think Trump could influence the awarding of the $10 billion DOD contract.




What the flying frick does this have anything to do with my post or the post of yours I was replying to?

Can you not even follow a simple thread?

Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Are you saying that Eisenberg sought to hide the transcript in an effort to assist Trump?

I'm saying that when it was first reported that the transcript was put on a secure server, the White House responded that placing a call like that on the secure server had no significance because Trump had done it before and so had Obama. Eisenberg would have been involved but it could have been his or someone else's decision.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:35 am to
quote:

What the flying frick does this have anything to do with my post or the post of yours I was replying to?

Read my post that you're responding to. You should be able to figure it out.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:40 am to
quote:

There is nothing incriminating in the transcript, so your point is a non story.


Why did they put it on a secure server to begin with? Why did they lie about why it got put on a secure server?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:41 am to
quote:

because he was using his influence to cover for his son

but he did not do that anyway


So it wasn't the foreign policy of the US?
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
42191 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:41 am to
Muh server sounds almost as pathetic as you believing blassey ford had two front doors
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44224 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:42 am to
I know exactly what I'm responding to. Your claim that the meeting notes being put on a classified server is some big fricking conspiracy.

It's clearly obvious you have zero experience or understanding about how and why documents end up in classified environments.

Posted by poli_tiger
NOLA
Member since Sep 2019
31 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:45 am to
Sondland is dropping some bombshells right now. Not looking good for Trump, Giuliani and Pompeo right now. Pence might get dragged into it also.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44224 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Sondland is dropping some bombshells right now.


Ya, the same kind of bombshells that have been dropped the previous three days.
Posted by Old Hellen Yeller
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9907 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:55 am to
quote:

You know its bad when WaPo is abandoning ship


It’s an opinion piece by a Bush staffer / Fox News contributor. Come on now
Posted by 20 ton
BR
Member since Aug 2013
936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 8:57 am to
This whole thing comes down to why Trump wanted the investigations. He admits he wanted them. The phone records show it and the witnesses say it. But why?

The witnesses agreed the Ukraine was corrupt. Burisma was corrupt and it wouldn’t be beyond their MO to buy influence.

Volker claimed Biden character was above reproach. There have been many honest men that have slipped for less than three million dollars that Hunter was paid. Even you can’t say this doesn’t raise questions.

All that was ever asked was for it to be looked into. He didn’t ask for anything to be manufactured like the Steel dossier was. He had the video of Biden bragging about using his influence to can the prosecutor which is better than any factual information the Obama administration had to spy on candidate Trump.

If this is about a foreign country then Hunter should have worked in the US. The Ukraine would have to at least help investigate a company in the Ukraine.

Even if Sondland assumed there was linkage there has to be proof that the president wanted more than legal honest let the chips fall where they may investigation. The Democrats want to ascribe the worst possible intent to actions that are easily defended. The protection of US Aid from corruption is REQUIRED of the president by law.

I want the Dems to prove they could read his mind. Good luck. TDS is strong in sooooo many people.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78073 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 9:05 am to
quote:

because they have the media to make up shite
I was referring to the media when I mentioned "imbeciles."
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14936 posts
Posted on 11/20/19 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

It's clearly obvious you have zero experience or understanding about how and why documents end up in classified environments.

That's not my point. Have you always struggled with comprehension?

My point was they first put it on the secure server, defended why it wound up on the secure server for 2 months, and now say it was put on the secure server by mistake. When did they realize it was a mistake?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram