- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WaPo is reporting the Pentagon is "intense and paranoid".
Posted on 3/2/26 at 9:24 am to GumboPot
Posted on 3/2/26 at 9:24 am to GumboPot
quote:
I posted Hannity in another thread to balance the WaPo article I posted here in the OP. So you can downvote me here and upvote me there.
Hannity is a fraud, too. I don't watch Fake Fox.
0
Posted on 3/2/26 at 10:55 am to GumboPot
Whether the Pentagon agrees with POTUS commands or not, its job is to plan and execute them precisely and meticulously.
Military leadership is responsible for providing honest, professional advice; developing feasible plans that align with all constraints; clearly communicating risks, assumptions, and tradeoffs; and executing approved plans to professional standards.
If the military failed to surface known risks, accepted unrealistic assumptions without objection, or executed the plan poorly within the approved scope of the operation, then the failure rests with them.
Military leadership is responsible for providing honest, professional advice; developing feasible plans that align with all constraints; clearly communicating risks, assumptions, and tradeoffs; and executing approved plans to professional standards.
If the military failed to surface known risks, accepted unrealistic assumptions without objection, or executed the plan poorly within the approved scope of the operation, then the failure rests with them.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 11:43 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Isn't that in the article? And I've heard it reported elsewhere. Three of our interceptors for every one of their ballistic missiles? Individually, I'm not trying to claim anything other than an opinion that it would be embarrassing (and worse) if we ran out of stuff.
It's the WaPo reporting so there's that.
It isn't just WaPo reporting on the shortage, and it didn't just start being covered. It has been a topic of discussion all the way back to Trump 1.0, and picked up steam after we sent so much to Ukraine, and especially after our support of Israel post-Oct. 7. It is a real issue that is a real concern.
This post was edited on 3/2/26 at 11:44 am
Posted on 3/2/26 at 12:00 pm to GumboPot
Lmao. Wapo
Posted on 3/2/26 at 9:41 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
No…..know an unintomed uneducated idiot when I see one.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News