- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wa State AG Warns Journalists Investigating Somali Daycares is Potential Hate Crime Charge
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:30 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:30 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Its not just MN theres videos emerging all over the place.
0
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:32 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I don't recall that. But I don't spend as much time as you, obsessing over Dem stupidity.
They didn’t release it because they are stupid. They release it because they wanted to give the impression that Trump was in a photo with Epstein victims.
It’s the same reason democrats and your beloved “journalists” lie about Trump 24/7. They know it will eventually be exposed as a lie, but the damage has already been done.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:34 pm to CleverUserName
quote:Because the "media" didn't do the redaction EITHER.
Ask the Committee. I didn't do the redaction.quote:
Why not the media??
Did some of them publish the redacted photo? Sure.
quote:"Takes their word" for WHAT? The Committee release a redacted photo, and some outlets promptly published it ... because it seemed like "news" and the public (part of it) has been howling for release of the "Epstein Files" for years.
You saying the media just takes the committees word for it?
And other outlets promptly found and published the unredacted photo.
Are you suggesting that "the media" should have rhetorically "sat on" that redacted photo ... until what? They were able to identify every redacted face?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:35 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
She is speculating as to the motives of the COMMITTEE in redacting those faces.
With the full intent to give her audience the impression that Trump is in a photo with Epstein victims.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:35 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
So those credentialed professionals don't get any info supplied to them
Just fricking run with it?
Those are your experts?
Alter
Just fricking run with it?
Those are your experts?
Alter
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:36 pm to Jbird
quote:"They?" "It?"
Speculation? Ffs they did it on purpose.
The redaction was done by the GOP-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
What is YOUR theory as to why they redacted those faces.
This should be fascinating.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:37 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Are you suggesting that "the media" should have rhetorically "sat on" that redacted photo ... until what? They were able to identify every redacted face?
How long would it have taken them to discover it’s a very publicly available image of Trump with adults?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
The Dems on the committee released that trash.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:38 pm to Jbird
quote:
Alter
AggieHank86 proud t sip class of ‘89
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:38 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:For the 400th time, the redacted photo was released by the GOP-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ... not by Democrats.
They didn’t release it because they are stupid. They release it because they wanted to give the impression that Trump was in a photo with Epstein victims.
This shoud be equally-fascinating. What is YOUR theory, sandwich boy, as to why the GOP redacted those faces?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:40 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
For the 400th time, the redacted photo was released by the GOP-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ... not by Democrats.
I’m replying to the post where YOU said it was Dem stupidity
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I will guarantee you the test will take into account some form of quality of output as a factor. Part of what training does it teach you how to produce better output.
In other words, “press” for people like you means “government approved press”. Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:40 pm to thebigmuffaletta
I give up.
You people just do not seem to grasp that it was REPUBLICANS who released the redacted photos. It is too nice a day to continue arguing with that level of intentional ignorance.
You people just do not seem to grasp that it was REPUBLICANS who released the redacted photos. It is too nice a day to continue arguing with that level of intentional ignorance.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I will guarantee you the test will take into account some form of quality of output as a factor. Part of what training does it teach you how to produce better outpu
Dan Rather had all of the credentials you believe make someone a “real professional journalist”.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:42 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I give up.
You should. You’ve changed your argument like 4 or 5 times
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:44 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:You really DON'T have a firm grasp on the English language.
For the 400th time, the redacted photo was released by the GOP-controlled House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ... not by Democrats.quote:
I’m replying to the post where YOU said it was Dem stupidity
My use of "Dem stupidity" was a description of the assertion that some "Dem representatives were actually calling them Epstein victims," NOT to any assertion that Dems released the photo.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:46 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:You are truly and utterly illiterate.
You’ve changed your argument like 4 or 5 times
My position has not changed one iota, not once.
You just cannot read and understand the English language.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:46 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
My use of "Dem stupidity" was a description of the assertion that some "Dem representatives were actually calling them Epstein victims," NOT to any assertion that Dems released the photo.
The entire point of them inserting the redacted photo into the release was to give the impression that Trump was with Epstein victims You know this you were just being a dishonest, leftist hack as usual
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
My position has not changed one iota, not once.
Sure you have. Earlier you said that there’s some superduper credentialed journalist that are doing investigations for like 20 hours and that’s what a “real journalist” is. Now your argument is the media. Shouldn’t have to investigate whether or not the redacted photo of Trump is with Epstein victims or actual adults.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 1:50 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:LINK
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released a new batch of photos from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate on Friday, including images of Donald Trump and several other powerful figures in the late sex offender’s circle.
Your a liar.
Page 12 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News