Voter ID is simply not a “States Right” issue

LINK

quote:

---

The Supreme Court has interpreted the Elections Clause expansively, enabling states to provide a complete code for congressional elections, not only as to times and places, but in relation to notices, registration, supervision of voting, protection of voters, prevention of fraud and corrupt practices, counting of votes, duties of inspectors and canvassers, and making and publication of election returns.2

---

The case referenced, and it's not new.

quote:

---

It can still be voted on and signed into law by Trump.

---

The signed into law from trump is not an issue. The dems and RINO faction will never do it. It would remove them from their position.

That's about more the review process than the regulation process.

Just past that is this:

quote:

---

For example, in its 2019 Rucho v. Common Cause decision, the Court held that partisan gerrymandering claims—claims that one political party has gerrymandered congressional districts to the disadvantage of the other party—are not justiciable by courts because the only provision in the Constitution [Article I, Section 4, Clause 1] that specifically addresses the matter assigns it to the political branches17 and such claims present political questions—outside the courts’ competence and therefore beyond the courts’ jurisdiction—that are not for courts to decide.

---

The court is specifically referencing review at the federal level, too. If you keep reading, the USSC specifically authorizes state judicial review of state legislature action re: election regulations.