voter fraud in independence vote

Requiring an ID to vote is racist.

quote:

---

Apparently people are walking in multiple times, claiming to be different people each time and casting multiple ballets.

---

They don't have voter rolls? If not that's crazy.

EDIT: Do you have a link?

quote:

---

They don't have voter rolls? If not that's crazy.

---

They have voter rolls but anyone can walk in and claim they are so and so. When the real person comes in to cast their ballet, they are finding that their names have already been crossed off.

I'm watching a live feed of Sky news. No Linky.

quote:

---

Apparently people are walking in multiple times, claiming to be different people each time and casting multiple ballets.

---

IMAGINE THAT

In the US we have such low voter turnout stuff like this may go virtually unnoticed or dismissed, but voter turnout over there is close to %85.

One other thing I remember about the U.K. is that you don't have to carry your driver's license with you when you drive over there.

EDIT: If there were instances of people's names already being crossed off when they went to vote, there would be chaos in this country. My guess is that it's very rare for someone to try this crap over here.

quote:

---

Anyone can walk in, provide a name and cast a ballet.

---

Well, hell, I see the problem. It's an election and the only thing some people want to do is dance! Eff that!

quote:

---

If there were instances of people's names already being crossed off when they went to vote, there would be chaos in this country. My guess is that it's very rare for someone to try this crap over here.

---

How do we know it's rare where the very people who are supposed to be monitoring the polling places are the ones who encourage the fraud?

quote:

---

This is how the dems have been winning. They will tell you the polls are favoring the dems so when they win no one will question the outcome

---

Well, I seem to recall that in 2012, the Republicans hired some pollsters to tell them Romney was going to win, and they still lost. How do you explain that?

quote:

---

With some precincts that have barely %30 turnout, you have a %70 chance of committing fraud and none would be the wiser. If you were smart, you could target people in certain demographics and greatly increase those odds (trolling obits would allow you to cast potentially hundreds of votes per station) . Whatever fraud is exposed would be minimal and dismissed as such.

---

One problem I see with this, is that in order to pull this off, you have to know for a fact that the person hasn't already voted, because you're busted if you identify yourself as someone who has already voted. Also, you would have to know enough about the person to know which precinct they vote in. It would probaly take some collaboration from the election workers so that you aren't just calling out random names.