Started By
Message

re: Vitamin K shots for newborns

Posted on 12/12/25 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Again, if 'open borders' is such a problem in terms of disease loads, why has the total number of cases and the incidence decreased so dramatically from when the country had less immigrants?


Look at the open border years- definitely an uptick. Open borders IS an issue with disease.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Look at the open border years- definitely an uptick. Open borders IS an issue with disease.



What? The trends in the data don't show that at all. Again, this is a terrible argument and for some reason you are doubling down.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

What? The trends in the data don't show that at all. Again, this is a terrible argument and for some reason you are doubling down.


I'm looking at the CDC website while chatting with you.

What is unclear about 76% of TB in the US being diagnosed of foreign born persons?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I'm looking at the CDC website while chatting with you.

What is unclear about 76% of TB in the US being diagnosed of foreign born persons?


I'm looking at the surveillance reports from 1953. What is unclear about the caseload and incidence rate being around 60% lower from 1993 to now despite increased immigration totals from high burden countries?

Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I'm looking at the surveillance reports from 1953.


What was true of factors in 1953 are obviously going to be different than 2023.

Treatment success and length being a huge difference over the course of 70 years.

I know you know this, by the fact you picked 1953 as an exemplar.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:04 pm to
Read my whole post. I chose 1993, literally 30 years from the last dataset, to reference the entirety of the decline. 1953 is when the dataset started, yes, but again, my post measures the decline in incidence rates and total cases from 1993, 1-9-9-3. Again, answer the question.

quote:

What is unclear about the caseload and incidence rate being around 60% lower from 1993 to now despite increased immigration totals from high burden countries?


Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

What is unclear about the caseload and incidence rate being around 60% lower from 1993 to now despite increased immigration totals from high burden countries?


Interestingly, the success has to do with better screening and case management.

Which would, perhaps, explain the recent uptick in the open border years- unfettered immigration makes it harder to screen, track, treat, and trace cases.

Again... 76% of TB is in the immigrant community.

It is a failure of immigration management.

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Which would, perhaps, explain the recent uptick in the open border years- unfettered immigration makes it harder to screen, track, treat, and trace cases.



What? You think the US can't handle caseloads which it historically handled before in the same decade? You argument, and I am saying this geniunely, does not make any sense any perspective.

quote:

Again... 76% of TB is in the immigrant community.



Again, I already explained why this is and yet the case numbers nowhere other than the return to the mean (arguably) in 2023 do we see very much variety in the numbers.

quote:

It is a failure of immigration management.



What if its just your failure and your failure alone to considering all the factors?
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

What if its just your failure and your failure alone to considering all the factors?


76% of TB is in the immigrant community. That has nothing to do with me.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:24 pm to
The total incidence rate is so low that it might as well be non-existent. In other words, even with unfettered immigration from high burden TB countries, it is likely that a physician could go several years without seeing a case. Apparently that fact is resistant to your understanding though.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

it is likely that a physician could go several years without seeing a case. Apparently that fact is resistant to your understanding though.


Immigrant communities tend to group... some docs may see very few or even zero; others will see plenty.
Posted by Norbert
Member since Oct 2018
3599 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Is he making up what he read?


Well, implying that a single shot of Vitamin K could possibly have a significant risk of cancer or infertility is ludicrous.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Immigrant communities tend to group... some docs may see very few or even zero; others will see plenty.



I'm well aware, but you aren't reading my sentences fully. Even with unfettered immigration, which is apparently somehow resistant to measurement except when it is convenient for you, this is the likely result. How are you not understanding this? The very notion that even in unfettered immigration, which I'm sure you would describe the Biden years, the rate never reached above 3 case per 100k, doesn't inform your viewpoint, what will?
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

The very notion that even in unfettered immigration, which I'm sure you would describe the Biden years, the rate never reached above 3 case per 100k, doesn't inform your viewpoint, what will?


76%

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:50 pm to
2.9 per 100000k.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

2.9 per 100000k.


Imagine how much lower overall it could be were it not for irregular migration.

Your figure is a combined total rate, regardless of status. The rate for US born individuals is 0.7-0.8%... and one wonders how even that low a rate contracted it.

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Your figure is a combined total rate, regardless of status.


Yes. We are making a like-for-like comparison. There is certainly no evidence for increases during the Biden years, which also had the 3 lowest caseload totals on record. And I suspect if you actually were interested in this topic instead of doubling down, the years you would regard as 'open border' years would also not show any increase. Do you know how I know?

quote:

one wonders how even that low a rate contracted it.


Do you just ignore things as convenient? Again, the question is this. If open borders are such a massive problem, why has the TB rate overall decreased despite high immigration from countries regarded as having a high TB burden? I suspect you are afraid of answering honestly because it would upset your original claim, but I also want to make clear the degree of your own dishonesty. It's incredible. You operate in amazingly bad-faith, are terrible at making arguments and have no understanding of what you talk about.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15258 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

There is certainly no evidence for increases during the Biden years,


Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39298 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 2:09 pm to
LINK

Are you forever going to avoid dealing with the substantive aspects of a post or are you going to try this chickenshit with me all the time?
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
16635 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

There's a range, but the average Amish uses about half the medical services that most Americans do.



Yeah but I think that is because of their lifestyle. Never gonna see an Amish Car Crash. They obviously don't sit around watching TV, And the words sedentary lifestyle dont apply to them.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram