Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Victor Davis Hanson Lays Out 10 Undeniable Truths Why This Peach Mint is a Coup

Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:20 am
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:20 am
quote:

1) Impeachment 24/7. [dims been attempting since the 2016 election, the Ukraine call is only the latest iteration.]

2) False whistleblowers. The “whistleblower” is no whistleblower by any common definition of the noun...Instead, the whistleblower relied on secondhand water-cooler gossip about a leaked presidential call.... Even his mangled version of the call didn’t match that of official transcribers.

3) First-term impeachment...[all other peach mints were second term]. [this appears to be either] a partisan exercise in either circumventing a referendum election or in damaging a president seeking re-election.

4) No special-counsel finding.

5) No bipartisanship.

6) No high crimes or misdemeanors. There is no proof of any actual crime. Asking a foreign head of state to look into past corruption is pro forma. That Joe Biden is now Trump’s potential rival doesn’t exculpate possible wrongdoing in his past as vice president, when his son used the Biden name for lucrative gain.

7) Thought crimes? Even if there were ever a quid, there is no quo...the Trump administration did supply arms to Ukraine, and the Ukrainians apparently did not reinvestigate the Bidens.

8) Double standards....[If QPQ] is an impeachable offense, should Biden have been impeached or indicted for clearly leveraging the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor for dubious reasons by threats of withholding US aid?

9) The Schiff factor. Schiff ...has repeatedly lied about ...Mueller indictments ... that he and his staff had no prior contact with the whistleblower...made up a version of the Trump call ...[and claimed it was] a “parody.”

10) Precedent. [the dims' abuse of the impeachment power over the past 3 years will set] a precedent in which the out party can use impeachment as a tool to embarrass, threaten or seek to remove a sitting president and reverse an election.


Pretty much sums it up. But hell, why use logic when dims can parade career bureaucrats to wax and wane over their "concerns" over what is or isn't appropriate foreign policies and their "feelings" about getting removed from their posts.

NY Post
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142060 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:22 am to
VD is awesome
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:24 am to
quote:

VD is awesome


May want to always use all initials when referring to Victor Davis Hanson just so it doesn't get taken out of context.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:24 am to

quote:

7) Thought crimes? Even if there were ever a quid, there is no quo...the Trump administration did supply arms to Ukraine, and the Ukrainians apparently did not reinvestigate the Bidens


Nice hedge
Posted by notslim99
City of Bossier City
Member since Feb 2005
4531 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:26 am to
I’m quite surprised that the NYPost printed this.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
15107 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Victor Davis Hanson Lays Out 10 Undeniable Truths Why This Peach Mint is a Coup


So what? So what is anybody gonna do about it?
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:30 am to
Is that not the case bmy?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142060 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:31 am to
quote:

I’m quite surprised that the NYPost printed this
The post is not the times

It's kinda very moderately semi conservative (for NYC), compared to the times' AOC lovefest
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 7:34 am to
quote:



Nice hedge




hahahaha

knew you wouldn't have shite to dispute any of it
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
13953 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 8:13 am to
quote:

6) No high crimes or misdemeanors. There is no proof of any actual crime. Asking a foreign head of state to look into past corruption is pro forma. That Joe Biden is now Trump’s potential rival doesn’t exculpate possible wrongdoing in his past as vice president, when his son used the Biden name for lucrative gain.


Trump asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden matter. He didn't ask them to convict him of anything. Even if Ukraine had investigated Biden it would have only benefited Trump if Biden was convicted of something. It would actually be damaging for Trump if Biden was exonerated. No way to consider this quid pro pro, bribery, or whatever fake quasi legal definition of anything the Democrats are trying to sell everyone on when you have no way of knowing if what you are asking is actually going to benefit you.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
11461 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Trump asked Ukraine to investigate the Biden matter. He didn't ask them to convict him of anything. Even if Ukraine had investigated Biden it would have only benefited Trump if Biden was convicted of something. It would actually be damaging for Trump if Biden was exonerated. No way to consider this quid pro pro, bribery, or whatever fake quasi legal definition of anything the Democrats are trying to sell everyone on when you have no way of knowing if what you are asking is actually going to benefit you.



I believe Trump already knows what Ukraine would find if they did an investigation into Biden/Burisma. He doesn't ask questions that he doesn't already know the answer. This whole thing is a lot bigger than just Biden. Huge house of cards, and is, basically, a money-laundering scheme that gets $$$ back into the hands of the politicians who fund foreign aid. I.E. Biden, Pelosi, and Kerry.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73851 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Nice hedge


Figures you have nothing
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81874 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 8:59 am to
Love this guy he’s one of the few intellectuals with balls to defend Trump.
Posted by Rooskie
MN
Member since Oct 2019
643 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 8:59 am to
Correct me if I am wrong, but Slick Willy was impeached in the House during his first term and was re-elected.
quote:

3) First-term impeachment...[all other peach mints were second term]. [this appears to be either] a partisan exercise in either circumventing a referendum election or in damaging a president seeking re-election.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Correct me if I am wrong, but Slick Willy was impeached in the House during his first term and was re-elected.


Ok, consider yourself corrected.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Correct me if I am wrong, but Slick Willy was impeached in the House during his first term and was re-elected.


Uh, 1998, second term.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram