- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
VA Gov vetoes bill to investigate proven voter fraud in Virginia
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:40 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:40 am
LINK
Democrats have gone full Ole Miss. If you ain't cheating you ain't trying.
Never go full Ole Miss.
quote:
Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe vetoed a bill that would require investigations of jurisdictions in the state whose voter rolls contain more registered voters than citizens who are eligible to vote.
The bill, first introduced by Republican state Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, was prompted by a report that shed light on eight Virginia counties that had more registered voters on their voter rolls than eligible voters.
quote:
McAuliffe, who vetoed the bill on Friday, claimed that the bill "would increase the administrative burden on local election officials" in his veto statement.
"By requiring 133 individual general registrars to conduct an investigation of voters under undefined standards, this bill raises serious constitutional questions," McAuliffe said in a statement. "It could expose eligible and properly registered Virginians to the risk of improper disenfranchisement."
Democrats have gone full Ole Miss. If you ain't cheating you ain't trying.
Never go full Ole Miss.
14
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:44 am to bamarep
quote:
"It could expose eligible and properly registered Virginians to the risk of improper disenfranchisement."
Good lord. I hope the people of Virginia don't accept this convoluted reasoning.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:45 am to bamarep
The federalillis will investigate this so don't worry about it
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:45 am to bamarep
quote:
Never go full Ole Miss.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:47 am to bamarep
quote:
Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe
Gee, imagine that.
The Clintons are so far up this guy's arse, his breath smells like Hillary's.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:49 am to bamarep
I can see the democrats' argument about not requiring ID to vote (if I squint real hard, and operate on the belief that all people are good and honest), but I completely fail to see how a refusal to even investigate cases like this can be justified.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:49 am to bamarep
quote:
whose voter rolls contain more registered voters than citizens who are eligible to vote.
thats proof of voter fraud?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:51 am to Jay Quest
What is the definition of voter disenfranchisement in the context of voting?
I see it used a lot and it seems like a a word that some civil rights person used years ago and now is a buzz word that means "racist."
If there is wrongdoing and there is an investigation, how is anyone being disenfranchised? As long as proper investigative procedures are followed and no rights are violated, how is ANY type of investigation wrong?
It seems that the left thinks that voters are so delicate that any pressure, from ID requires to potential investigations, will cause the whole house of cards to tumble.
I see it used a lot and it seems like a a word that some civil rights person used years ago and now is a buzz word that means "racist."
If there is wrongdoing and there is an investigation, how is anyone being disenfranchised? As long as proper investigative procedures are followed and no rights are violated, how is ANY type of investigation wrong?
It seems that the left thinks that voters are so delicate that any pressure, from ID requires to potential investigations, will cause the whole house of cards to tumble.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:53 am to jeff5891
quote:
thats proof of voter fraud?
If your suddenly have $10k in your checking account that you can't prove you put there,v is it yours?
You suck at math.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:55 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
What is the definition of voter disenfranchisement in the context of voting?
Exactly. McAuliffe was just throwing words together without any intent to establish cognizant meaning. It was just mindless gibberish.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:56 am to bamarep
Nice false analogy
Can that 10k be registered in multiple states?
Bannon and Mnuchin committed fraud for being registered in multiple states?
Can that 10k be registered in multiple states?
Bannon and Mnuchin committed fraud for being registered in multiple states?
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 8:00 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:56 am to BamaChemE
quote:
I can see the democrats' argument about not requiring ID to vote (if I squint real hard, and operate on the belief that all people are good and honest), but I completely fail to see how a refusal to even investigate cases like this can be justified.
I understand opposing voter ID if the ID is not free. Bc otherwise it's a poll tax. That's the only reason I can think of.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 7:57 am to jeff5891
quote:
thats proof of voter fraud?
It certainly suggest an investigation may be in order. Hopefully without disenfranachiing the lawfully registered voters of the state.
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 7:59 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:01 am to Jay Quest
quote:
It certainly suggest an investigation may be in order.
And I don't disagree
Trying to say it's proven voter fraud is pretty dumb
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:04 am to bamarep
quote:
If your suddenly have $10k in your checking account that you can't prove you put there,v is it yours?
should this be investigated by the government? or taken care of in a normal, administrative fashion?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:05 am to bamarep
That's OK. Trump's people will handle this for Terry McCuckliffe.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:10 am to jeff5891
Spend that $10k that's not supposed to be there and see how false it is.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:20 am to Jay Quest
How come legal voters are not considered disenfranchised when illegal votes are cast? It seems to me for every illegal vote cast a legal vote is disenfranchised.
I think just as much attention should be paid to this argument as the other, in fact more, these people took the time and effort to register properly.
I think just as much attention should be paid to this argument as the other, in fact more, these people took the time and effort to register properly.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:25 am to GALSUtiger
quote:
How come legal voters are not considered disenfranchised when illegal votes are cast?
They should be outraged and demand full disclosure of what took place in voting districts across their state.
I approve of the way you established the disenfranchised aspect from the lawfully registered voters POV. Mcauliffe used the word as a smokescreen.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:29 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
What is the definition of voter disenfranchisement in the context of voting?
When flimsy pretexts like this are used to pass bills that wrongly deprive Americans of their right to vote.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News