- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U.S. Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution Stuns World Health Officials
Posted on 7/8/18 at 3:58 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 7/8/18 at 3:58 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
The benefits of breast milk over formula are highly overstated.
True. I'm wondering why we opposed it rather than not engaging/participating in this resolution though.
1
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:01 pm to notsince98
quote:
I agree for the most part but people in general are completely ignorant about how much healthier breast feeding is. It is tied to everything from immune health to brain development.
Can you tell which humans were bf vs formula fed? No one else can either.
This post was edited on 7/8/18 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:02 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I'm wondering why we opposed it rather than not engaging/participating in this resolution though.
You assume the WHO seeks actual debate.
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:03 pm to zatetic
Lol should we tell her secks is still pleasurable even with a circumcision?
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:03 pm to BigAppleBucky
Their surprise isn’t shocking:
The rest of the world thinks Americans are unduly preoccupied with bosoms
The rest of the world thinks Americans are unduly preoccupied with bosoms
Posted on 7/8/18 at 4:43 pm to deeprig9
quote:
99.999% of mothers would be delighted to successfully breast feed. Formula is expensive.
Are you under the impression that people are being forced to use formula?
Posted on 7/8/18 at 10:34 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
It makes titties sag.
Not true.
Posted on 7/8/18 at 11:08 pm to BigAppleBucky
We need companies to make money selling the milk.
The cows are not needed.
The cows are not needed.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 8:24 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
The resolution called for a complete ban on formula and other artificial infant breast-milk alternatives.
Jesus, if this is true, nuke the UN, they can't be saved.
It isn't true, the resolution said nothing of the sort. The poster was just spouting bullshite, which you'd have known if you read the article.
Usually V&S is the one calling out stuff like this.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 8:34 am to deeprig9
quote:
99.999% of mothers would be delighted to successfully breast feed. Formula is expensive.
1) False
2) Not all mothers can breastfeed. And if we are talking straight from the boob, that doesn't always work either. If we were forced to go straight from the boob for both of my sons, they would likely not be alive. Women are different. Some have different ducts/nipples/glands/etc... that can prevent the baby from getting proper nutrition. And some women, their milk doesn't even come in.
This is a good move. We don't need some world conglomerate dictating personal preferences. I'm sure the globalists were all for it.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 8:37 am to notsince98
quote:
I agree for the most part but people in general are completely ignorant about how much healthier breast feeding is. It is tied to everything from immune health to brain development.
Same thing applies for vaginal vs c section births. Vaginal is so much better for many reasons but many have no clue.
And we know one poster who doesn't have kids. You're full of shite.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 12:44 pm to BugAC
quote:
1) False
2) Not all mothers can breastfeed. And if we are talking straight from the boob, that doesn't always work either. If we were forced to go straight from the boob for both of my sons, they would likely not be alive. Women are different. Some have different ducts/nipples/glands/etc... that can prevent the baby from getting proper nutrition. And some women, their milk doesn't even come in.
This is a good move. We don't need some world conglomerate dictating personal preferences. I'm sure the globalists were all for it.
You are agreeing with me. I think alot of people here have poor reading comprehension.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 1:00 pm to deeprig9
quote:
crack down on formula makers and specifically their ability to advertise their products.
Why do thy need to be "cracked down on"? Also, they shouldn't be able to advertise?
Posted on 7/9/18 at 1:35 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Why do thy need to be "cracked down on"? Also, they shouldn't be able to advertise?
What I'm saying is 3rd world fricking moron countries take shite to the extreme. The same reason they hack up Christians in the jungle or burn down farms owned by white people, or refuse to use birthcontrol because the local witchdoctor says the UN is giving them AIDS through vaccines and poisoned wheat.
If the WHO says breastfeeding is better than formula, it could easily snowball into some banana republic dictator banning formula.
Now go reread my post, if you still don't understand, I can't help you.
Posted on 7/9/18 at 1:39 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Now go reread my post, if you still don't understand, I can't help you.
Derp. Makes sense now.
As my wife says, "What? Do I have to hit you in the head so you'll understand?"
Me: "Yep, sure do".
Posted on 7/9/18 at 1:42 pm to Yellerhammer5
quote:4
Breastfeeding babies is a waste of a perfectly good set of titties.
This is all part of Trump's "Make titties not sag again" campaign.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News