- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Uranium One Illegalities -- Mueller, Weissmann, Rosenstein Involved Up To Their Eyeballs
Posted on 11/5/17 at 4:42 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/5/17 at 4:42 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
With all that information you have, one would think you would have shared the specifics with the board somewhere in this thread.
Actually, he did (page 2)
He said the same thing on page 2 he said on page 5. Neither post had any information on point.
Also, on page 3 you said:
quote:
It is part of the congressional record as well.
Where could I find it in the congressional record?
Posted on 11/5/17 at 4:44 pm to texridder
quote:
What makes you think we paid "top dollar" for uranium from Russian nukes?
That's an odd thing to take issue with.
What relevance does whether or not payments were "top dollar" have on the legal issues?
Posted on 11/5/17 at 4:55 pm to texridder
quote:The term "strawman" was dead on point.
Neither post had any information on point.
quote:Frankly, you've done nothing to indicate it would be worth my time searching it for you. If you'd like to look it up though, I believe it was included in House Committee meeting proceedings.
Also, on page 3 you said:
quote:
It is part of the congressional record as well.
Posted on 11/5/17 at 7:20 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The term "strawman" was dead on point.
Do you know what the "straw man" fallacy is?
What is it that makes the argument I presented a straw man?
Posted on 11/5/17 at 9:16 pm to texridder
quote:Disingenuity? Again?
What is it that makes the argument I presented a straw man?
Well, let's see . . .
'Uranium One' in this context is a polysemous term. i.e., company, scandal, or both. The OP pretext in no way was limited to the company in isolation. Simple really. I assumed you'd somehow misunderstood that though. Turbeauxdog's notations made clear I'd assumed incorrectly.
Your strawman knowingly references Uranium One as if it or its purchase were disassociated from any related Russian corruption.
This post was edited on 11/5/17 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 11/5/17 at 9:18 pm to NC_Tigah
You've officially gone full retard.
Posted on 11/5/17 at 9:21 pm to texridder
I see you’re still in the thread telling your lies
Posted on 11/6/17 at 9:51 am to Strannix
quote:
I see you’re still in the thread telling your lies
I see you’re still in the thread with nothing worthwhile to contribute.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News