- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Uranium One Illegalities -- Mueller, Weissmann, Rosenstein Involved Up To Their Eyeballs
Posted on 11/4/17 at 5:12 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 11/4/17 at 5:12 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That is really not what was said though. The statement was Mikerin exercised leverage via extortion though confederates. Same with direct sales.
It didn't have anything to do with U.S. companies' purchases of uranium.
2 articles saying different doesn't make it fact.
Read the indictment release if you want the facts.
1
Posted on 11/4/17 at 6:17 pm to texridder
quote:It is part of the congressional record as well.
2 articles saying different doesn't make it fact.
quote:Make what fact?
2 articles saying different doesn't make it fact.
You've noted no fact.
You've noted no facts.
You've simply misinterpreted widely held assertions.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 6:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
The OP, who frequently uses Russian bot sources, thinks that FBI leaders being involved in an FBI investigation is fishy.
Oh, and he also thinks that the should have leaked information from an open investigation to as many as a dozen elected officials.
I don't even read your posts anymore, I just down vote. I really hate doing that but I know your post will cause me to hit down vote 99.9999% of the time so to save time I just hit the down vote.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 7:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Make what fact?
You've noted no fact.
You've noted no facts.
You've simply misinterpreted widely held assertions.
Is this what you do? Just act dense and act like you don't know what I'm talking about.
The article said Mikerin extorted U.S uranium purchasers. I said he didn't extort any purchasers because the investigation didn't involve the purchase of uranium but rather the contracts for the transportation of uranium to the U.S.
You responded that it wasn't Mikerin who extorted the U.S. purchasers, but his co-conspirators, like that fixes the incorrect facts in the article.
Neither Mikerin or his co-conspirators extorted any U.S. purchasers, because the investigation wasn't about uranium sales. The indictment is clear on that.
Either you didn't read the indictment which I linked, you couldn't understand it, or you don't want to admit the article was false.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 7:52 pm to texridder
Melt
Why the NDA??
Why the NDA??
This post was edited on 11/4/17 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:01 pm to Strannix
quote:
Melt
Why the NDA??
Whenever someone says something you don't like is that what you do -- just say "melt". That's it?
It's not the NDA it's the NRC? Is your memory failing?
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:03 pm to texridder
quote:
The article said Mikerin extorted U.S uranium purchasers. I said he didn't extort any purchasers because the investigation didn't involve the purchase of uranium but rather the contracts for the transportation of uranium to the U.S.
He didn't do it because the investigation didn't involve it?
That makes no sense.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:07 pm to texridder
quote:
It's not the NDA it's the NRC? Is your memory failing?
Non disclosure agreement stupid frick
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:10 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Can someone cliff notes what this is all about?
Republican and Trumpkin dumbasses think that there is some type of massive conspiracy to move a pound of yellowcake uranium and for hte Clintons to somehow make money off a deal involving 9 governmental agencies all beholden to the persuasive charisma of the Clintons and some high level FBI personnel. oh and Obama ofcourse was involved.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:12 pm to Cruiserhog
Not any more of a stretch than Muh Russia. At least the cash the Clintons received can be verified.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:16 pm to Cruiserhog
$145 million fricking dollars for nothing
Yes, that makes sense.
Yes, that makes sense.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:17 pm to Cruiserhog
Wow you are scared as frick
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:18 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
He didn't do it because the investigation didn't involve it?
That makes no sense.
The contention in the article is that the Mikerin investigation involved extortion by Mikerin in the sale of uranium to U.S. purchasers and that it was somehow connected to Uranium One.
But the Mikerin investigation had nothing to do with Uranium One. It didn't even involve the sale of uranium. It involved extortion on contracts for the transportation of Russian uranium to the U.S.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:27 pm to Strannix
quote:
Non disclosure agreement.
I have not seen anything where the FBI explains the NDA in his particular case.
The fact that there was an NDA doesn't change the facts about the subject of the investigation and the fact that had nothing to do with Uranium One.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:28 pm to texridder
quote:
But the Mikerin investigation had nothing to do with Uranium One. It didn't even involve the sale of uranium. It involved extortion on contracts for the transportation of Russian uranium to the U.S.
Wrong, the transport kickback scheme was one of many parts of the investigation into Mikerin, you really don’t know what you’re talking about do you?
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:31 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
At least the cash the Clintons received can be verified.
Only if you believe the Clinton Cash book that was written by a Breitbart reporter, edited by Bannon, and published by Robert Mercer.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:44 pm to Strannix
quote:
Wrong, the transport kickback scheme was one of many parts of the investigation into Mikerin, you really don’t know what you’re talking about do you?
I have read the Mikerin indictment and the plea agreement. There is nothing in either one other than the transportation kickback scheme.
So at least on this, I do know what I'm talking about.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 8:55 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Republican and Trumpkin dumbasses think that there is some type of massive conspiracy to move a pound of yellowcake uranium and for hte Clintons to somehow make money off a deal involving 9 governmental agencies
Have you seen the list of the 9 people involved in the vote? They weren't Republicans -- all of them were Obama appointees.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 9:00 pm to texridder
quote:
I have read the Mikerin indictment and the plea agreement. There is nothing in either one other than the transportation kickback scheme. So at least on this, I do know what I'm talking about.
This is what the entire thread is about you idiot, there was an entire range of crimes and huge investigation involving Mikerin, and somehow it all got whittled down to a simple conspiracy charge. We aren’t talking about just the plea and indictmen!, there was an entire range of crimes that were covered up.
Posted on 11/4/17 at 9:21 pm to Strannix
quote:
This is what the entire thread is about you idiot, there was an entire range of crimes and huge investigation involving Mikerin, and somehow it all got whittled down to a simple conspiracy charge. We aren’t talking about just the plea and indictmen!, there was an entire range of crimes that were covered up.
You're wrong. So I guess that makes you the idiot.
The discussion about the plea agreement was that Mikerin was investigated for extortion, racketeering, and money laundering -- all in connection with transportation scheme -- but that he plead guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News