Started By
Message

re: UK is now detaining conservatives

Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97696 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

He thinks he's the first liberal to play that silly game


Olddawgshite? He claims hes no liberal
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26451 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

You are claiming Snopes does not have a liberal bias? Correct?


Someone is blatantly claiming that they DO in fact have a liberal agenda. I’m asking for evidence. It would be cool for once that y’all didnt spin this to make yourselves the victims. But yes if you’re going to provide evidence, please do it.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Someone is blatantly claiming that they DO in fact have a liberal agenda. I’m asking for evidence. It would be cool for once that y’all didnt spin this to make yourselves the victims. But yes if you’re going to provide evidence, please do it.


Patience grasshopper. I wasn't asking what someone else said. I'm asking your opinion. In your opinion, does Snopes have a liberal bias. Yes or no?
This post was edited on 3/11/18 at 1:57 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97696 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotesand even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship (RELATED: Snopes Caught Lying About Lack Of American Flags At Democratic Convention)

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included Benghazi at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.





Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117471 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:57 pm to
LINK

There's about 100 more. Look them up yourself.
Also, the earth is round. Look it up if you don't believe me.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Girls who wear caps = trash


What a stupid fricking thing to say
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

The owners can be liberal or conservative as shite for all I care, none of you have provided evidence that they push an agenda whatsoever. This shouldn’t be too hard.


I agree. Visit their site

Peruse.

It's cumulative

Of course, you already know that. Hence, your silly game

Dude. You're not that slick
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

SDVTiger

For quality purposes could you link your source on the matter?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

LINK

There's about 100 more. Look them up yourself.

Now that wasn't so difficult was it?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97696 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

For quality purposes could you link your source on the matter?


Zach did
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26451 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:02 pm to
So you used a site founded by tucker Carlson to prove that another site is liberal?

I’m not asking if the founders are liberal. I don’t care what they said about people. I’m asking if they are lying about anything they’ve said is “false” or “unproven” or whatever.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173381 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

So you used a site founded by tucker Carlson to prove that another site is liberal?

The main fact checker on snopes is liberal

But that doesn't mean that every single thing from there is bullshite. It just means that you might want to actually do a little bit more research beyond just snopes.

Crazy right?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

I’m not asking if the founders are liberal.


immediately after dismissing a site because of its founder. You are a caricature

quote:

So you used a site founded by tucker Carlson to prove that another site is liberal?


This post was edited on 3/11/18 at 2:05 pm
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26451 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

The main fact checker on snopes is liberal


I have no doubts about that. Most movies and music I listen to and watch are made by liberals as well.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26451 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

immediately after dismissing a site because of its founder. You are a caricature


Uhh you get why I did that right?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97696 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

immediately after dismissing a site because of its founder. You are a caricature


It's incredible
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Uhh you get why I did that right?


Because you are a hypocrite and a partisan hack.

I'll ask a third time. In your opinion, does Snopes have a liberal bias? Yes or no.
This post was edited on 3/11/18 at 2:06 pm
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
26451 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:06 pm to
It’s an article in a conservative news source stating that the founder of snopes is a liberal. I have yet to see one shred of evidence of a liberal bias on the site. Can ANYONE provide one thing? If not I’m done here
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59239 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:06 pm to
I'll ask a fourth time. In your opinion, is snopes biased?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117471 posts
Posted on 3/11/18 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

So you used a site founded by tucker Carlson to prove that another site is liberal?


This is exactly why I avoided posting a link. If I post link No. 2 out of the 100 that prove Snopes is bullshite then you will indict No. 2.

It is not my goal to convince you. If you want to believe that Snopes is legit that's fine. You can remain among the uninformed morons who are the majority in this country.

That's why I used the example of SPLC. I always answer your questions. So, answer mine. Do you believe the SPLC is credible?
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram