- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/10/22 at 3:54 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
Do we even know this
We know, in fact, that it doesn’t.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 3:55 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
but it still holds up against severe disease / mortality.
The frick it does.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 3:55 pm to the808bass
quote:
The frick it does.
The frick it certainly does.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 3:57 pm to BamaAtl
Maybe we should get a similar graph before Covid vaccines were administered for comparison. Like how we can compare school districts with mask policies to one’s that didn’t, which showed no statistical difference. You don’t need to be a scientist to see the implications there
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:00 pm to the808bass
quote:
Pfizer cooked their data
It wasn’t just Pfizer. The data was cooked from the very beginning. None of the numbers and percentages can be taken seriously. It’s climate change modeling and statistics/numbers on steroids. There’s a massive agenda here
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:02 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Between covid-19 and influenza? Of course they can.
The UK’s flu deaths and cases went to virtually zero. RED FLAG
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:03 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
Maybe we should get a similar graph before Covid vaccines were administered for comparison.
Given the cyclical nature of the outbreak and the emergence of variants, that wouldn't be very comparable.
quote:
Like how we can compare school districts with mask policies to one’s that didn’t, which showed no statistical difference.
Among children? With a low risk to start?
What we can do is look at the risk to adults, especially older or at-risk adults. Those data are clear in the effectiveness of the vaccine to prevent severe outcomes.
quote:
You don’t need to be a scientist to see the implications there
That's how we get 'studies' like the OP, that are systemically bad and lead people to incorrect conclusions.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:04 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
If you think we made more money from covid-19 patients then we would from a transplant or oncology or total knee patient, I have a bridge to sell you
I’ve seen dozens of YouTube videos of people going around to hospitals during peak Covid when they said wait times were 5 hours. The parking lots were empty and so were the hospitals. These people were quickly escorted out by security. They got it all on film
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:06 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Most of the deaths I'm referring to are "from COVID" - the vast majority. There just isn't a huge percentage of people who were going to die in a hospital on a particular day regardless of whether they got covid-19 - it almost always hastened their demise.
You have nothing to back up that claim
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:12 pm to BamaAtl
It’s possible that the most at risk fat and old people died and there isn’t a large percentage of people that will die from the disease left, except the obese minorities. Maybe if they didn’t send these people to death facilities in the first place most could have survived. Or maybe if they actually had an early treatment plan like every other fricking illness on the planet most would have made it. To this day they still don’t have an early treatment plan. They tried to undermine monoclonal antibodies. I didn’t see one commercial for people to lose weight and get healthy. If you wanted as many people to die as possible, this is the game plan. On top of that, they gave people Remdisivir in the hospital when they are about to die, which had what….a 53% death rate during trials? Why were they so aggressive at stopping people from trying early treatment plans with safe medications. Why did they fund multiple fake studies calling them death drugs and publish them in the most prestigious journals? None of this shite adds up
This post was edited on 5/10/22 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 5/10/22 at 4:41 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
So you agree that the covid-19 vaccine is safe? Why does this thread even exist, then?
You seriously can not be this stupid??
Guys quit arguing with this dolt, that answer alone proves what a complete sheep he, she, it….is!!
Posted on 5/10/22 at 5:22 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Given the cyclical nature of the outbreak and the emergence of variants, that wouldn't be very comparable.
The jokes write themselves, if only you realized what you do to yourself. 110 IQ max, I'm in a giving mood today.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 5:31 pm to DRMPHD
In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, there was a 40% increase in ACM in the vaccinated group. They killed an estimated 7 people for every person they saved from COVID!
In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, there were a total of 21 deaths in the vaccine group and 15 deaths in the placebo group.
In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, there were a total of 21 deaths in the vaccine group and 15 deaths in the placebo group.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:04 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It's also very easy to rely on the totality of information to come to an understanding that the covid-19 vaccine is both safe and effective.
It might be easy, but it's not very smart or insightful.
You've been fooled. You are a Covid cheerleader/useful idiot for your party's politics. What makes you entertaining is you seem to genuinely believe you're opinions are based in facts/reality.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:17 pm to David_DJS
quote:
It might be easy, but it's not very smart or insightful.
I'm not sure your advice to disregard the scientific method is the best course. You might want to sit and think on that one.
I know you think you can figure this out with your tin foil hat and your horse paste, but you really should sit this one out.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:26 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Given the cyclical nature of the outbreak
You mean seasonal. Speaking of cherry picked data again fricktard. They knew this was seasonal, would put back restrictions and when the seasonal spike went away they’d claim masks did this. But yet they never looked at something like Louisiana tracking the same as Florida. A wide open state.
Nothing we did in our state did shite.
This post was edited on 5/10/22 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 5/10/22 at 7:28 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
your horse paste
Oh so you are a retard?
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:06 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I'm not sure your advice to disregard the scientific method is the best course. You might want to sit and think on that one.
I know you think you can figure this out with your tin foil hat and your horse paste, but you really should sit this one out.
This post is meaningless. How is my pointing out that you were fooled by inaccurate Covid statistics me disregarding the scientific method?
Explain that.
And to be clear, I'm not arguing in support of this study. I've already made my view on it known. I'm arguing that you should have approached all the Covid cheerleading stats with the same level of scrutiny you did this study, and that because you didn't - you have been fooled.
Posted on 5/10/22 at 8:14 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
disregard the scientific method
I take it back, this putz is 100 IQ max.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News