Started By
Message

re: Tucker Carlson says no one's been killed (in the U.S.) by radical islam in 24 years ....

Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:32 am to
Posted by BayouBaw84
Member since Oct 2016
3268 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:32 am to
Maybe he’s saying it’s being directed by the CIA.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27660 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:34 am to
Man...I can remember a year or two ago when anyone would suggest Tucker Carlson was a grifter and attention-seeker, you swear you were trashing their best friend.

He showed you all his cards of disingenuity (because I don't believe he's really that ignorant) with his whole "Look how much cheaper groceries are in Russia" video. Yet, so many were still licking his crotch over it.

The dude is after clicks and followers, plain and simple. He's an entertainer. Like Alex Jones, Rachel Maddow, Laura Loomer, etc., the real truth isn't as important as what drives click and ad revenue.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 8:37 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10715 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:50 am to
quote:


What exactly do you need additional help with in understanding my post?


The question was what the point of the statements in question were.

Were they not both intended to indicate to Huckster's audience that radical Islam isn't something they need to worry about?

All you did was provide additional evidence to indicate that that is the case, but somehow I think you believe that the additional evidence supports the opposite conclusion.

Thus my confusion.

So instead of posting some additional nonsense, just answer the question. It's a yes or no question. Isn't the point of both of those statements to indicate to Huckster's audience that radical Islam is not a significant threat to them?
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43551 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:53 am to
quote:

The question was what the point of the statements in question were. Were they not both intended to indicate to Huckster's audience that radical Islam isn't something they need to worry about? All you did was provide additional evidence to indicate that that is the case, but somehow I think you believe that the additional evidence supports the opposite conclusion. Thus my confusion. So instead of posting some additional nonsense, just answer the question. It's a yes or no question. Isn't the point of both of those statements to indicate to Huckster's audience that radical Islam is not a significant threat to them?


quote:

Carlson’s point here is the threat from radical Islamic terrorism — when viewed on an individual level — is minuscule compared to many other societal issues. Statistically, it is much more likely for a U.S. citizen to be a victim of violent crime than to be targeted in an act of terror.

This is not meant to diminish the very real security threat posed by Islamic terrorism; rather, it acknowledges that ideologically motivated violence is extremely rare. Therefore, while the intent of Carlson’s statements might be perceived as downplaying the threat of Islamic terror, the argument is primarily about maintaining perspective relative to the actual statistical risk posed by acts of terror.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10715 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Errerrerrwere


So that's a yes?

Why are you acting like a Democratic politician?

Just say yes.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10715 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Errerrerrwere


So yes.

In that case, the poster to whom I originally replied (which was not you, btw) was wrong.

The two statements he compared were NOT "completely different."

They conveyed exactly the same idea.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10715 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Errerrerrwere


quote:

Look kids! Another retard!


You were looking in the mirror when you identified that retard.

As I clearly stated that my observation was off topic. But that same idiotic text picture—which probably isn't even real—gets posted here every other day and it's been used mostly to "prove" what I commented on.

I can make an off topic observation about something like that, even if you don't like it.

So frick you.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 9:04 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43551 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

You were looking in the mirror when you identified that retard. As I clearly stated that my observation was off topic. But that same idiotic text thread—which probably isn't even real—gets posted here every other day. I can make an off topic observation about something like that, even if you don't like it. So frick you.


Look kids! Public education trash broke dicks!

Believing everything he reads on the internet like a good little muppet.

Carry on, pigeon!
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10715 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Believing everything he reads on the internet like a good little muppet.


This is exactly why the retard you saw was in the mirror.

I'M the one believing everything I read on the internet?

I'M the one circulating idiot conspiracy theories like a mouth breathing dullard?

The fact that you think I need to read it on the internet to come to the conclusion that that text picture is likely fake makes you the biggest moron on this board, and that's saying a lot.

O.k. shite for brains. You made me laugh this morning. Thanks for that.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 9:09 am
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43551 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:07 am to
quote:

So instead of posting some additional nonsense, just answer the question


The threat of Islamic terror for Americans is considerably less than dying of fentanyl.

You are too stupid or too dishonest to recognize that. But you knew that.

If you are this scared of Islamic terror you need to put your fricking mask back on, lock your door, hide under your bed, and suck your thumb and let real men handle these issues for you.

You just stay inside and be a woke little bitch clutching your pearls and calling people names, woman.

You serve no purpose here.
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
43551 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I'M


quote:

I'M


Yes. You! You are a weak man. Physically and mentally. Looks like you are about to set up some difficult times for us.

Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42243 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 9:47 am to
quote:

He showed you all his cards of disingenuity (because I don't believe he's really that ignorant) with his whole "Look how much cheaper groceries are in Russia" video. Yet, so many were still licking his crotch over it.

The dude is after clicks and followers, plain and simple. He's an entertainer. Like Alex Jones, Rachel Maddow, Laura Loomer, etc., the real truth isn't as important as what drives click and ad revenue.

Something happened to him .... who knows what. Someone got to him. He was probably already on the edge and easily susceptible to threats or bribes or intimidation or whatever ... but something tipped him over the edge. He always had it in him. CIA daddy, He was always ripe for the picking. So few people really know his background.


quote:

Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson, born on May 16, 1969, in San Francisco, California, is an American conservative political commentator and television host. He is the elder son of Dick Carlson, a former "gonzo reporter" who served as director of Voice of America and U.S. ambassador to the Seychelles, and Lisa McNear, an artist. His father legally adopted him and his younger brother, Buckley Peck Carlson, after remarrying Patricia Caroline Swanson, an heiress to the Swanson Enterprises fortune. Carlson grew up in La Jolla, California, and attended La Jolla Country Day School before completing his secondary education at St. George's School in Rhode Island. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in history from Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, graduating in 1991.

Carlson began his journalism career in the 1990s, working as a fact-checker for Policy Review and later as an opinion writer for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette before joining The Weekly Standard in 1995. He gained early national attention in 1999 for an interview with then-Governor George W. Bush, in which he quoted Bush using profanity and mocking the execution of Karla Faye Tucker, a controversy that drew criticism from Bush's campaign. He hosted the nightly program Tucker on MSNBC from 2005 to 2008 and co-hosted CNN’s Crossfire from 2001 to 2005. In 2009, he joined Fox News as a political analyst and launched his own show, Tucker Carlson Tonight, in 2016.

Carlson co-founded The Daily Caller in 2010 and served as its initial editor-in-chief until selling his stake in 2020. His show became one of Fox News’s most-watched programs, known for promoting far-right ideas and conspiracy theories, including the "great replacement" theory, claims of election fraud, and misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic. In April 2023, Fox News canceled Tucker Carlson Tonight following a $787 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in a defamation lawsuit over false claims about the 2020 U.S. election. After leaving Fox News, Carlson launched his independent media platform, The Tucker Carlson Show, which is hosted on X (formerly Twitter).

Carlson has been described as a high-profile proponent of Trumpism and an influential voice in right-wing media. He has defended Russian President Vladimir Putin and conducted a rare interview with him in Moscow in February 2024, the first by a Western journalist since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He has also expressed admiration for Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, visiting Hungary to interview him and promote Orbán’s nationalist and anti-immigration policies. Carlson has written three books: Politicians, Partisans, and Parasites (2003), Ship of Fools (2018), and The Long Slide (2021).

Carlson’s political affiliations have shifted over time; he was a member of the Democratic Party from 2006 to 2020 and has been a Republican since 2020. He is known for his criticism of immigration, skepticism toward U.S. foreign interventions, and advocacy for protectionism, having previously identified as an economic libertarian. His remarks on race, immigration, and gender have been described as racist and sexist, leading to advertiser boycotts of his show. He is married to Susan Andrews, whom he met while at St. George’s School, and they have four children.


Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
39838 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

If you are this scared of Islamic terror you need to put your fricking mask back on, lock your door, hide under your bed, and suck your thumb and let real men handle these issues for you. You just stay inside and be a woke little bitch clutching your pearls and calling people names, woman.


This is the take of a retarded man
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42243 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

This is the take of a retarded man

I just ran the numbers on Errerrerrwere in this thread.

He's replied to almost 35% of the posts in this thread thus far ... an insanely obsessive compulsive rate of negative interactions.

And he's issued over 100 downvotes to those attempting to reason another point of view with him. There is one 20 post string where he downvoted literally everyone in the string except himself. Just imagine the level of derangement it takes to do that.

He's pathological.
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 20Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram