- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Pimps? Not that easy to do.
And…
quote:
I want to actually attack the problem effectively and not virtue signal (or promote echo chamber mythology).
Are kids being trafficked - yes or no?
If yes, how do YOU propose to address the issue?
2
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:20 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
SFP invariably regurgitates regime-approved talking points.
Its mind blowing. He LOVES him some talking points.
People with no natural instincts or ability to trust their own thoughts always borrow from others.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:20 am to Toomer Deplorable
He gets an F for communication skills. It’s hard to follow what TF he is even arguing in most threads. Maybe that’s what he wants.
I remember my technical writing professor making the point that the fundamental part of technical writing is actually communicating to your audience.
I remember my technical writing professor making the point that the fundamental part of technical writing is actually communicating to your audience.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:20 am to Padme
quote:
Maybe that’s what he wants.
Obfuscation.
He thinks youre not smart enough to notice. Hes a bullshite artist.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:22 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
yes, how do YOU propose to address the issue?
Which specific issue?
Words are very important for this discussion. I explained why in detail a page or 2 ago
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:23 am to Padme
quote:
He gets an F for communication skills.
If he and Crazy4lsu ever got into a discussion, no one including those two would understand the lines of demarcation. Lots of words to say absolutely nothing.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:23 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He LOVES him some talking points.
Are you still arguing basic women are the ones arguing human trafficking does not exist?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:25 am to Padme
quote:
He gets an F for communication skills. It’s hard to follow what TF he is even arguing in most threads
Largely because I can't get honest responses to get a baseline to even discuss. That's not on me.
If I try to set up a rational discussion and the only responses are non-responsive talking points (sometimes not even in words), logical discussion is derailed.
I even posted long form responses with intricate details and people just ignore them to be NPCs
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which specific issue?
Quit deflecting.
quote:
I want to actually attack the problem (child trafficking ) effectively
You shite on my response and then gave some vague virtue signal (“I’m not going to virtue signal” was a virtue signal…pretty ironic stuff.).
So what is YOUR plan?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:31 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Quit deflecting.
That is the literal opposite of deflection
quote:
So what is YOUR plan?
For international child trafficking? The best we can do is open up more free trade in poor countries to raise the standard of living. That's how you combat black markets. It's an economic problem and it will require an economic solution.
There is a reason child trafficking is mostly for labor.
I've already said this in this thread
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 10:33 am
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:41 am to stout
Bejeebus this train wreck was painful to try to read through. I didn’t have the moral fortitude to complete the journey. I was only able to gather two points from it. One, the mainstream media HATES this movie making light of child trafficking and will do anything to discredit it and minimize it’s impact. Two, SlowFlowPro has no problem with child trafficking or pedophilia; but he is smarter than anyone else here. And if you don’t believe that, just give him 20 or 30 replies to let him convince you.
It takes a special kind of immorality to defend child trafficking for any reason, even if it is just to win an internet argument over semantics.
It takes a special kind of immorality to defend child trafficking for any reason, even if it is just to win an internet argument over semantics.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:43 am to captdalton
quote:
Bejeebus this train wreck was painful to try to read through. I didn’t have the moral fortitude to complete the journey. I was only able to gather two points from it. One, the mainstream media HATES this movie making light of child trafficking and will do anything to discredit it and minimize it’s impact. Two, SlowFlowPro has no problem with child trafficking or pedophilia; but he is smarter than anyone else here. And if you don’t believe that, just give him 20 or 30 replies to let him convince you.
Nailed it.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:45 am to captdalton
quote:
Two, SlowFlowPro has no problem with child trafficking or pedophilia
An honest argument
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Largely because I can't get honest responses
You do, you just can't understand things in the social realm.
Go find some non autists to mansplain it to you.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:48 am to captdalton
quote:
It takes a special kind of immorality to defend child trafficking for any reason,
Yep.
Make it socially acceptable again and he will be all over it.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:48 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Are kids being trafficked - yes or no?
One of the biggest pipelines is the foster care system.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:49 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
One of the biggest pipelines is the foster care system.
You see that's a different argument but different variables because now you're talking about domestic trafficking. That's why I asked him what specifically he was talking about because you gave a different answer for a different problem
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You see that's a different argument
In what way?
Its a pipeline, do you understand the word?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 10:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
In what way?
Poor children in poor countries being taken by organized crime into forced labor and sex work is not the same thing as problems at home leading to runaways, foster care and the things you referenced. That part you referenced is true but that's domestic. We have more options with that because it's within the US and our jurisdiction and isn't due to failed States and organize crime so a more organic approach can work theoretically
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:00 am to Honest Tune
quote:
One, the mainstream media HATES this movie making light of child trafficking and will do anything to discredit it and minimize it’s impact.
I would expect that. The media is activist, theyre going to run cover for progressive ideals.
One of the things the Soros Foundation does very well is seed "independent media" which is a feeder for mainstream outlets. Much of which is published in mainstream media actually comes from pure paid activism.
Page 8 of 49
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News