- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:26 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:26 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Holy fricking shite
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:With these people, it is the same on EVERY ... DAMNED ... ISSUE.
Yes, me wanting less government in my life (as clearly laid out in that post) means I got sucked into the "vaccine moral panic"
"I do not oppose abortion in the first trimester."
"Why do you support post-birth abortions?!?!?!?!"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:28 pm to Vandyrone
quote:
Holy fricking shite
You support the government using emergency powers on the books to take away your rights?

I mean that post was from March of 2020. Seems like I was a good soothsayer. What I feared happening, did.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:29 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
With these people, it is the same on EVERY ... DAMNED ... ISSUE.
"I do not oppose abortion in the first trimester."
"Why do you support post-birth abortions?!?!?!?!"
Hell with that example it wouldn't even be a comment on the same topic. People are going to read his post in the context and think I was discussing vaccines. Hell, he may be stupid enough to think I was talking about vaccines (in March of 2020 before the lockdowns

Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:35 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
It is simpler than that.
It’s really simple.
Messing with kids in a sexual way is bad.
It’s so bad that the worst people in the world think it’s bad.
Then we have people like you 2 come along and play the semantics
game.
No decent person cares about your “argument”. No decent person cares about
your incessant need to “win” an argument on the Internet.
The fact that you won’t condemn child abuse but you would rather
argue what if - isms shines a spotlight on YOU.
If you need to prove how intelligent you are why can’t you find a topic
other than child abuse?
Which evolves to the obvious question. Why does people fighting child
abuse piss you off so badly?
There’s something wrong with you.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:37 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
Then we have people like you 2 come along and play the semantics
game.
No decent person cares about your “argument”. No decent person cares about
your incessant need to “win” an argument on the Internet.
The fact that you won’t condemn child abuse but you would rather
argue what if - isms shines a spotlight on YOU.
If you need to prove how intelligent you are why can’t you find a topic
other than child abuse?
Which evolves to the obvious question. Why does people fighting child
abuse piss you off so badly?
Are you posting from a pdf?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I specifically have responded in a way as to give detailed, rational responses in order to avoid the rhetorical trap of having to agree with all points of the argument you've been spoonfed. When the response isn't what you anticipated, this occurs.
Utter B.S. you sanctimonious sack of sh*+.
You entered this conversation in bad faith with the express purpose of derailing this thread by claiming that any criticism of the ICJ’s report to the UN that promoted the normalization of sexual relations between “consenting” minors was part of a right wing “mythos” regarding child sexual abuse.
I’ve posted this before and I assume I’ll post it again as you obviously need a periodic reminder:
Not everyone on this board is as near as dumb as you think they are and you are not near as smart as you think you are.

Oh, and the CISA thread IS getting bumped!

This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you posting from a pdf?
Everyone sees you.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:50 pm to bamadontcare
quote:Yes, it is.
bamadontcare
It’s really simple. Messing with kids in a sexual way is bad.
And agreeing with that premise does not require one to heap unreserved praise upon a movie that no one has even seen yet.
Except in the minds of simpletons.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:50 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
You entered this conversation in bad faith
Nope. I'm still the only one to post any data and I have given very detailed responses and asked a lot of questions (that were mostly ignored).
I even did it to your dishonest posts (including the one last page where you responded to a comment about vaccines with a post of mine having nothing to do with them). An example of bad faith by you.
quote:
by claiming that any criticism of the ICJ’s report to the UN that promoted the normalization of sexual relations between “consenting” minors was part of a right wing “mythos” regarding child sex trafficking.
Never made this argument.
You're connecting multiple arguments from different discussion threads and combining them into one.
Again, bad faith.
And, in further bad faith, you refused to answer simple questions.
quote:
Not everyone on this board is as near as dumb as you think they are
Everyone? Certainly not.
It's not the dumb people I'm concerned about. It's the dishonest ones (*cough cough*)
quote:
and you are not near as smart as you think you are.
I'm not what I once was (155+ IQ) due to age, but I'm still up there.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:50 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Oh, and the CISA thread IS getting bumped!
Good. I can ask you questions and have you not answer them and continue to act in bad faith.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not what I once was (155+ IQ) due to age, but I'm still up there.
There it is.

Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yes, me wanting less government in my life (as clearly laid out in that post) means I got sucked into the "vaccine moral panic"
Is that what we are calling sh*++ing our britches these days?

You sanctimonious a-hole.

Posted on 7/8/23 at 7:58 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Is that what we are calling sh*++ing our britches these days?
No. It's called the words I used.
quote:
this behavior just increased the odds of men with guns affectin MY life
why do you think you have a right to behave in a way that increases government in my life
The words make it clear my main focus was trying to limit increased government in my life (which is exactly what happened, sadly).
quote:
You sanctimonious a-hole.
Was a vaccine even in existence on that post was made?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:00 pm to bamadontcare
quote:If you are 6/4", no one cares when you say you are 6'4".
I'm not what I once was (155+ IQ) due to age, but I'm still up there.quote:
There it is.
If you run a 4.8 forty yard dash, no one cares when you say that you run a 4.8 forty yard dash.
If you have a 34" vertical leap, no one cares when you say that you have a 34" vertical leap.
But if you tell people that you have a genius-level IQ or scored 1600 on the SAT, they completely lose their shite.
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you posting from a pdf?

Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:02 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
And agreeing with that premise does not require one to heap unreserved praise upon a movie that no one has even seen yet.
I’ve seen it.
It’s about a guy trying to help kids.
Trying to help kids.
Trying to help kids
Trying to help kids
Trying to help kids
I understand that giant IQ guys can’t understand simple
concepts like that but the guy is trying to help kids.
If you went to Uganda and asked the first person you saw how
you could help kids I bet you would be received warmly.
You however, decided to attack those that try to help kids.
You use some obscure code of language to make it seem like
you are correct but you are trying to obstruct people who
are trying to help kids.
Stop it.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are you seriously trying to get Toomer to see logic?
Was a vaccine even in existence on that post was made?

Here, teach this little guy some calculus. It would be more productive.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not what I once was (155+ IQ) due to age, but I'm still up there.
So you saying you are a stable genius?

Good! Why don’t we all explore the heights of your towering intellect and revisit The “Wuhan Lab Leak “ thread.
Remember it? The one in which you revealed your ignorance on the true nature of GOF research?
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/covid-1984-was-created-in-a-wuhan-lab-msm-fact-checkers-said-it-was-a-crazy-conspiracy/96537317/

Posted on 7/8/23 at 8:05 pm to bamadontcare
quote:Where did I do this? Be specific. The timestamp of the post.
You ... decided to attack those that try to help kids.
quote:And in your mind, that automatically makes it a great film.
I’ve seen it. It’s about a guy trying to help kids.
Trying to help kids. Trying to help kids. Trying to help kids. Trying to help kids
OK
Back to top
