- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump seeks more than $300,000 in legal fees from Stormy Daniels
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:00 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:00 am to BBONDS25
if there is an argument to be made, it's about the choice of law, which would be an easy argument for a lawyer to make once he read the case. either tex isn't a lawyer or went to like TX southern and doesn't understand choice of law
1
Posted on 10/30/18 at 7:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
either tex isn't a lawyer
It’s this. I don’t know where the rumor got started. But he has never actually said “yes. I’m a lawyer”. It’s really a strange thing to want to pretend to be. We know lots of lawyers. I try to stay away from them whenever possible!
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:09 am to 10MTNTiger
quote:
300k is a lot of champagne room time, better get to twerk Stormy
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:14 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Remember I still have a gofundme to help her.
Search it.
Eta: not one donation yet.
Search it.
Eta: not one donation yet.
This post was edited on 10/30/18 at 8:16 am
Posted on 10/30/18 at 8:16 am to 10MTNTiger
She gon have to smoke lots of Pedro.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 11:24 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
t's like I told a know-it-all one time - you're like a right-handed person telling a left-handed person how to use his hand.
The funny thing is -- I AM left-handed.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 11:35 am to Proximo
quote:Either that or he just decided the outcome he wanted and worked backward.
Are you implying the judge’s factual findings were incorrect?
He said they didn't establish how Trump “knew or did not know about the 2011 threat in the first place.”
But Trump's tweet refers to the composite sketch of the person who allegedly threatened her and says "a sketch years later."
I don't know how that doesn't establish that Trump knew about the threat.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 11:58 am to Gaspergou202
He should take the money and donate it to the NRA.
He can then go on Twitter and thank all the Libs who helped fund Stormy and thank them for their kind donation.
He can then go on Twitter and thank all the Libs who helped fund Stormy and thank them for their kind donation.
Posted on 10/30/18 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i mean, it's pretty clearly the right ruling. anti-slapp laws are pretty simple
quote:
“The court agrees with Mr. Trump’s argument because the tweet in question constitutes ‘rhetorical hyperbole’ normally associated with politics and public discourse in the U.S.,” Otero said earlier this month, noting that the First Amendment protected such language.
"Rhetorical hyperbole" as an "exaggeration and/or overbroad generalizations used to achieve an effect in speech or writing."
I don't see how "a total con job" is rhetorical hyperbole.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News