- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Reveals ‘We Now Know Everything’ About the 2020 Election
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:33 pm to Napoleon
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:33 pm to Napoleon
quote:This always kills me
I'm saying I need proof
Prove that Biden got 81 million votes. Who told you that? Where did you get that information. Was it from the same people who ran ballots through the scanners overnight after they sent poll watchers home?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:36 pm to Napoleon
quote:O'Keefe recorded a video of a person at an outreach center in Georgia admitting that homeless people use the center as their voting address - which is illegal in Georgia. A homeless shelter can be used (stupidly) but not an outreach center. The real question isn't was there voter fraud. The real question is why wasn't it investigated more than it was. Why did judges routinely not allow evidence to make it's way in to court?
where is the proof?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:37 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Holeee Crap. Did you just link a 2017 article trying to debunk the 2020 election fraud. Damn, are you too stupid to argue with
Before you spew insults you should actually read the link I replied to because it makes you look foolish when you don't.
The post I replied to had a link to ongoing database by the Heritage foundation. If you took time to read it you would see it had very little to do with the 2020 election but focused on claims that were years, if not decades, old.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:37 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Nope
Did they or did they not boot out the GOP poll watchers then resumed the count with out them?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:37 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:The problem is that his laptop was suppressed by the govt and the media. Had that information been allowed to be made public, like it subsequently has, the public would have known how corrupt the whole family is. Such as their treasonous dealings in Ukraine and China
So your "proof" is that the media did not promote Hunter Biden's dick pics more?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:38 pm to Napoleon
quote:
Why cheat partially and not all the way if your going to cheat?
There are limits. It’s hard enough to cheat as much as they likely did.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:39 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:Does that actually disprove election fraud? Not one bit. OTOH, it actually looks kind of suspicious when considered altogether
a judge reviewed the filings, heard the arguments, and ruled that the claims failed on substance
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:41 pm to beaux duke
quote:Is there a govt agency and judges working against the people looking for bigfoot? Preventing them from presenting their findings? Because I would say that looks pretty suspicious, wouldn't you?
there are plenty of youtube videos that prove bigfoot exists. that doesn't mean bigfoot exists
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:42 pm to therick711
Same with Georgia. Obama lost Georgia both times, Hillary lost Georgia, Kamala lost Georgia but somehow Biden wins Georgia. Video proof of ballot mules going to 15 ballot drop boxes daily for weeks across multiple counties and those people were not even from Georgia. Ruby Freeman calling the police and admitting it on video but nothing to see here. Then they file cases against Trump and multiple others for questioning it.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:42 pm to Napoleon
quote:Because the vast majority of them are uniparty/establishment. It does not serve their political interests to do so. Plus many of them are never trumpers anyway. I can't imagine why you think that point actually means anything substantive
Why would GOP leaders not fight if they had proof?
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:45 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
D'Souza did not "apologize."
I didn't say he did. The publisher did.
“It was never our intent that the publication of the ‘2000 Mules’ film and book would harm Mr. Andrews. We apologize for the hurt the inclusion of Mr. Andrews' image in the movie, book, and promotional materials have caused Mr. Andrews and his family.”
They also pulled the books
LINK
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:45 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:In Fulton co, election officials sent the poll watchers home. Then they began running ballets through overnight. When the poll watchers returned the next morning, the vote tally had changed DRASTICALLY in favor of Biden.
The courts that reviewed it found no violation of observation rights, and both parties still had credentialed challengers inside the room
But I agree, these shenanigans don't look AT ALL SUSPICIOUS
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:47 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:Oh so there's election fraud
Only 105 cases come within the past five years, and 488 within the past 10 years. Thirty-two cases are from the 1980s and 1990s.
just 10 cases involving in-person impersonation fraud at the polls
only 41 cases involving non-citizens registering, voting, or attempting to vote
THANK YOU
quote:No it does not genius
Your link in no way supports Trump's unhinged claims of rampant voter fraud, in fact it confirms how rare it is
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:47 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:And there is the goalpost shifting. Add that to the genetic fallacy
Most of them small-town registration errors, signature issues, or people voting twice in school board races, at that
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:48 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
In Fulton co, election officials sent the poll watchers home. Then they began running ballets through overnight. When the poll watchers returned the next morning, the vote tally had changed DRASTICALLY in favor of Biden.
Nope
LINK
Three strikes, you are out.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:49 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Nope
QUOTING SNOPES in 2025
Yes, even freaking 1984 big brother liberal Google acknowledges that Fulton co officials told poll watchers to go home. They then ran ballots through unsupervised.
I know this hurts your feelings
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:49 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Maybe you should have waited to post. You said you were going to debunk my list, yet nada, not one. Its hard to debunk cases that have already been adjudicated, aint it?
So maybe you shouldnt have posted again. Or at all
you
quote:
your list
me
quote:you
I'd be happy to go through those one at a time, if you're game, starting with 1 or wherever you like. I won't pretend I'm familiar with all of them but we can consider the facts of each and present evidence/counter evidence and see where that leads.
quote:me
Start here. You wont be back
Election Fraud Map A Sampling of Proven Instances of Election Fraud
quote:I invited you to discuss your points. I even asked you to choose the first point. You bizarrely responded with a link to a that shows voter fraud has been super rare for at least the last 40 years.
Well, look at that, my second time back trying to get you to respond after being told I wouldn’t be. Starting to think “he’ll be gone after my link” isn’t the slam dunk you thought it was.
So... about 1,400 cases total across 40+ years of elections? That’s roughly one case per 20 million votes. Most of them small-town registration errors, signature issues, or people voting twice in school board races, at that.
Were you intending to disprove widespread voter fraud? If that’s your knockout evidence after four years of searching, I think I’ll risk another comeback.
And here I am still willing to have that conversation.
And there you are full of shite.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:51 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
What you are dismissing actually matters as evidence
Not at all. It’s just a number. Zero evidentiary value.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:51 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:I posted facts about the cases
Nope
You linked a leftist "fact check" site that doesn't even ultimately disagree. All it did was the standard moving of goalposts
And it doesn't address all of the other fraud that's been found
pathetic
Posted on 10/27/25 at 8:52 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Most of them small-town registration errors, signature issues, or people voting twice in school board races, at that
quote:When were the goalposts ever small-town registration errors, signature issues, or people voting twice in school board races? The topic is the 2020 election.
And there is the goalpost shifting. Add that to the genetic fallacy
Popular
Back to top


0





