- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump Justice Dept. Closed Investigation Into Tom Homan for Accepting Bag of Cash
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:13 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:13 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No, it wasn’t. It was opened under Biden. Trump’s DOJ found no evidence.
What did Biden's DOJ find?
1
Posted on 9/22/25 at 12:27 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Funny. Kind of hard to accept a bribe when he wasn’t a federal employee at the time.
Anything else can be considered a lobbyist.
GFY with this shite.
The federal bribery statute applies to officials that have been selected even before they take office, as you would expect, otherwise this shite would be legal, and it shouldn't be.
18 USC 201 "...(b)Whoever—
(2)being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A)being influenced in the performance of any official act;....shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States."
Posted on 9/22/25 at 1:00 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What did Biden's DOJ find?
They referred for investigation.
Edit: actually we don’t know. And yes, they don’t refer. They take referrals.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:49 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 2:59 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
No, it wasn’t.
Yes it was.
quote:
They referred for investigation.
No they' didn't. DOJ doesn't refer for investigation. Congress people do that.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 3:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
If true
Stopped reading here because there's no way this bullshite is true.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:25 pm to John somers
Wrong. He allegedly accepted the money under Biden‘s presidency. He was referred for investigation during Biden‘s time.
Trump‘s DOJ investigated and found no wrongdoing. Patel even said so.
Trump‘s DOJ investigated and found no wrongdoing. Patel even said so.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:26 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Wrong. He allegedly accepted the money under Biden‘s presidency. He was referred for investigation during Biden‘s time.
Trump‘s DOJ investigated and found no wrongdoing. Patel even said so.
What are you suggesting? He got off due to the laziness of the Biden DOJ?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:28 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
He was referred for investigation during Biden‘s time.
Once again, and I think it’s an important distinction, the DOJ does not refer for investigation. They take referrals for investigation. So, the DOJ didn’t refer Homan for investigation under Biden. If they took any action, they investigated him.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What are you suggesting? He got off due to the laziness of the Biden DOJ?
He was referred near the end of Biden’s term, after Trump won the election.
The investigation had nothing to do with Biden‘s DOJ and everything with Trump’s DOJ. I’m not suggesting that. I am stating it as fact.
Edit: September 2024 is when it allegedly occur
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:43 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
Once again, and I think it’s an important distinction, the DOJ does not refer for investigation.
I don’t think I said Biden‘s DOJ referred for investigation. He was referred under Biden‘s watch.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:30 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
He was referred
What do you think this means?
When are you suggesting he "accepted money"?
When did the Biden DOJ come into this information?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:36 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What do you think this means? When are you suggesting he "accepted money"? When did the Biden DOJ come into this information?
After he “allegedly” took the money, it was reported to the DOJ. Accepting the cash was allegedly in September 2024. I stand corrected, it did not happen after Trump was elected.
I don’t know if Biden‘s DOJ did anything with it during the last couple of months. Don’t know if it was referred for investigation during Biden’s time or not.
Allegedly Trump‘s DOJ shut down the investigation down after Trump was inaugurated. This could, keyword could, imply that the investigation was started under Biden.
Patel reported that Trump’s DOJ did not find any wrongdoing during the investigation. So at the least Patel reported that Trump’s DOJ completed the investigation.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:38 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:38 pm to LSUTANGERINE
So, your beef here is what exactly?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:40 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
He was referred near the end of Biden’s term, after Trump won the election.
False. It started in the summer of 2024. Next.
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:41 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I don’t really have a beef. The reports are saying that the investigation was “shut down” by Trump’s DOJ. Patel says they found no wrongdoing.
By the way, Homan never denied taking the money. He only says he did not do anything illegal. This was during an interview with I believe it was Megan Kelli. That could be true. Or maybe not. DOJ won’t release anything to clear things up. I guess they’re being a very transparent administration.
By the way, Homan never denied taking the money. He only says he did not do anything illegal. This was during an interview with I believe it was Megan Kelli. That could be true. Or maybe not. DOJ won’t release anything to clear things up. I guess they’re being a very transparent administration.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:42 pm to the808bass
quote:
False. It started in the summer of 2024. Next.
I already cleared that up. Thanks anyway. Next.
Actually, we don’t know when it was referred. We know it was no earlier than September 2024 and no later than January.
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:42 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
By the way, Homan never denied taking the money.
Who did he supposedly take this money from?
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:43 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I have no information, but I’m digging in like a tick.
LSUTangelo
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:44 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Who did he supposedly take this money from?
Undercover FBI bro; you know that.
This is not some sort of gotcha.
Like the FBI doesn’t set up sting operations with drug smugglers and major tax criminals
This post was edited on 9/23/25 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 9/23/25 at 4:47 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Like the FBI doesn’t set up sting operations with drug smugglers and major tax criminals
Do they have to refer the situation to the DOJ for investigation when drug smugglers and major tax criminals bite on their stings? How's that not a criminal act? I'm trying to understand what you think went down and how this played out, and how if Homan really "bit" on an FBI "sting," the Biden DOJ couldn't (or wouldn't) do something about that IMMEDIATELY.
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News