re: Trump instructs the UFO files to be released

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Here's what I think UAPs are

I think the core cases are non-human autonomous engineered systems that behave like distributed sensors and test assets, not like vehicles with occupants.

They look like “craft” to us because humans pattern match to vehicles. I think the better mental model is field-deployed instruments that can reposition, sample, and evade, with loss tolerated.

What their architecture probably looks like

1) Local staging nodes

They persist in-domain. If they do not persist locally, the logistics signature would eventually show up clearly. Local staging can be underwater, upper atmosphere, or orbit, with the ocean being the most plausible for hiding and proximity to naval assets.

2) Tasked excursion nodes

The thing you see is the excursion node. It enters a sensor and response envelope, provokes a reaction, records the reaction, exits. It does not need to win a dogfight. It needs to win the information trade.

3) Relay and coordination layer

A single node cannot reliably perform the pattern people report without a cueing picture. I think there is a relay or coordination layer that can hand off tasks and maintain awareness across domains.

What their objective function is

I think they are running a long-term program to map:
• human sensor capabilities and coverage gaps
• engagement doctrine and decision latency
• escalation thresholds around nuclear systems and carrier groups
• how human institutions contain ambiguity, stigmatize inquiry, and classify anomalies

That last one matters. If you can make a species self-blind through stigma and bureaucracy, you can operate indefinitely at low risk.

Why I think “probe” rather than “visitors”

Because the behavior is consistent with measurement, not communication.
• repeat visits to high value military nodes
• minimal interaction, no negotiation, no messaging
• controlled ambiguity and rapid exit
• persistence over decades

That is reconnaissance logic.

How I think the “impossible performance” works

I think it is a blend of two mechanisms, depending on case.

A) Real performance edge

Some nodes can genuinely move in ways we cannot match, likely because they can manage drag and heat better than our systems, and can transition between air and water without the normal penalties.

B) Perception control

Some “instant acceleration” profiles are the result of degrading our tracking confidence across radar, IR, and fusion systems. If you can manipulate track formation and handoffs, you can manufacture an impossible looking object without needing impossible thrust. The point remains the same: break intercept logic and keep attribution uncertain.

What I think the government knows

I think the US has a small set of cases with high-fidelity data and possibly material custody. I think they still do not have reliable control, capture ability, or full understanding, which is why the public story stays in permanent ambiguity.

Bottom line:

There is a non human autonomous ISR presence operating on Earth that sometimes runs close passes on our most information-rich military systems, and the reason it remains unresolved publicly is because the state would rather manage stigma and classification than admit a standing penetration by something it cannot deter.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Let me say this more directly and with a little more precision than I usually do. The reason I am talking at all like this is that no one inside has asked me not to do so with a credible ask. Here goes:

I don’t know if we have made alien contact. But there is a mountain of indirect evidence that is all but impossible to explain otherwise.

There is a mountain of fabricated BS mixed in with it. We deliberately produced copious BS to hide whatever the reality is.

There is no explanation for the first mountain of real indirect evidence having given us no hard evidence. That is the puzzle I can’t solve. I admit that.

Ultimately this secret involves the hardest of the sciences: Mathematics, Biology, and Physics.

I do not believe the String Theory story of “The Only Game In Town” is remotely possible. It’s just too dumb.

I believe string theory is harmless. The thing that doomed us was TOGIT.

TOGIT is the soft sunset program the Biden @WhiteHouse discussed with @pmarca and @bhorowitz. It cuts off all oxygen to anyone who challenges the decision to seal all our best Professors into the intellectual sarcophagus of modern QuantumGravity so they cannot threaten our national interest. Then the lid is glued shut with Peer Review, Elsevier, h-indices, impact factors, arxiv moderation, jstor, loyalty oaths, DEI, deans, HR, etc to ensure no escape takes place.

I believe that since May 4th, 1969, there has been a move to relocate the open science (particularly physics/mathematics) on which National Security depends OUTSIDE universities because top professors are seen as subverting NatSec.

I believe that James Schlesinger will come up in this discussion and that the Mansfield amendment was completely misportrayed as a peacenik move. It was about soft sunsetting the brilliant but stubbornly independent professors like Leo Szilard, Steve Smale, Alexander Grothendieck, Phillip Morrison, Linus Pauling, etc

I believe that the attempt to do hard basic science in National Labs, Comoany Labs, Aerospace companies, Hedge funds, High security university affiliates (Draper, Lincoln, JH Applied Physics Lab, etc), think tanks, etc was NOT as successful as hoped.

I don’t believe that the Government cracked physics. At all.

I also believe there is some secret scientific knowledge kept from theorists in universities. I just don’t believe it is that much. But I’m more open to being wrong on that than 2 years ago. Still find it hard to believe.

I believe Jeffrey Epstein’s covert operation was trying to spy and recruit scientists based on the belief that certain areas of science when dark.

I believe Epstein’s puppeteers were obsessed with Gravity for good reason. They wanted to know if there was US secret scientific knowledge of post-Einsteinian, post-spacetime engineering. Which is wildly smart.

I believe the El Paso NOTAM wasn’t about Cartel Drones at all. I don’t think it was about Texas or the Border either. I believe it was another name for highly sensitive areas of New Mexico north of West Texas. Look at a map.

I believe we talk too much about Florida and Little St James. I believe New Mexico as home to Sandia, Zorro, Roswell, Los Alamos, Trinity, Bill Richardson, etc unites the UFO, Epstein and “Strange Death of Physics” Stories.

I believe @pmarca and @bhorowitz are truth tellers. That may even be the key.

I believe this is about disturbing secrets which people used to kill for, and this is going to be a LOT less ‘fun’ than people used to recreationally speculating about and UFOs imagine.

---