- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump gets over 100K votes in New Hampshire primary
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:10 am
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:10 am
70K more than Obammy did as incumbent. TRUMP is gonna skull-drag whoever the dim candidate is. Gonna be a landslide baws.
Edit: 70K not 30K
Edit: 70K not 30K
This post was edited on 2/12/20 at 7:20 am
4
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:27 am to CajunTiger78
Last count I heard was about 128K. Obammy got roughly 49K in 2012. Trump supporters are already fired up for 2020.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:30 am to CajunTiger78
quote:
Last count I heard was about 128K.
Damn. I saw the Repb. chairman for the state being interviewed yesterday and he said he expected to get a 100,000 after "experts" predicted Trump would get around 80,000.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 7:39 am to CajunTiger78
this just reinforces the stupidity of having such a small state primary early in the process.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:41 am to Mr Sausage
quote:How is the "large state early" not stupid when the broader field makes even more voters "feel" disenfranchised as their early candidates fall away?
this just reinforces the stupidity of having such a small state primary early in the process.
Small states 1st is so more voters stay interested/invested in the race while fewer voters do the weeding.
Sure, they could try to pick a more varied racial/ethic mix small state 1st, like Mississippi or something. However, race alone is not a good measuring stick as they would end up fracturing that smaller segment too. People are people, always will be some contrarians who oppose popularity.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:43 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Repb. chairman for the state being interviewed yesterday and he said he expected to get a 100,000
NYT is saying 145,000 with 91% of precincts reporting. Damn.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:45 am to Mr Sausage
quote:
this just reinforces the stupidity of having such a small state primary early in the process.
We should go all in with California first and New York second followed by Illinois and then Vermont. That would produce the proper candidates.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 8:45 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
NYT is saying 145,000 with 91% of precincts reporting. Damn.
And those were just the people at his rally.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 9:22 am to LSU Patrick
Crazy
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:07 am to CajunTiger78
UGHH. The damn Russians got involved in New Hampshire.
Posted on 2/12/20 at 10:10 am to aTmTexas Dillo
Yup. Fair is fair!
Posted on 2/12/20 at 11:10 am to Sidicous
My point was that the field gets narrowed by a primary that has less people voting than a lot of counties let alone other states. If we are going to knock the field down, wouldn’t it be better to use a larger % of people?
Posted on 2/12/20 at 11:13 am to CajunTiger78
In November, the silent majority will be even more overwhelming than in 2016. Sane America is FED UP.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News