Started By
Message

re: Trump can't/won't answer whether a man can be a woman in Megyn Kelly interview

Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:35 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:35 am to
quote:

You are a fricking joke


Yet the word “no” appears twice in what YOU posted. Just like I said. Is reading difficult for you?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116993 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Ronbots praying every night that states remove Trump from the ballot.


No.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:36 am to
quote:

You’re acting like a liberal.


Her question:

"Can a man become a woman?"

His answer:

quote:

"Ummmmmmmmmm.... haha...In my opinion...(pretty indecipherable but close) if a man can a woman, I'd...I think...I think part of it is birth. Can the man give birth? No. No, although they'll come up with some" then it cuts off.


You're defending that.

I'm suggesting the actual answer ought to have been, "No...of course not."

One of those is the more traditional conservative answer...one is not.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116993 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:37 am to
quote:

bullshite. But I simply do not care who was in a fricking pageant a decade ago. The fact you do is kinda sad.


What does this have to do with the fact that Trump cannot answer whether a man can be a woman?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:37 am to
I’m not sure what you’re so upset about. He clearly says no. And his reason is a man can’t give birth. That’s pretty straight forward.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116993 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:38 am to
He does not answer "No" to the question.

He answers No to whether a man can give birth, then equivocates on even that
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116993 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

He clearly says no.


He does not.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

What does this have to do with the fact that Trump cannot answer whether a man can be a woman?


Another lie. He clearly says a man cannot be a woman and his reasoning is that a man cannot give birth. Reading comprehension issues or just dishonesty? Which is it.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Yet the word “no” appears twice in what YOU posted.


quote:

"Ummmmmmmmmm.... haha...In my opinion...(pretty indecipherable but close) if a man can a woman, I'd...I think...I think part of it is birth. Can the man give birth? No. No, although they'll come up with some" then it cuts off.


They do...though not in reference to the question he was actually asked.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28202 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

bullshite. But I simply do not care who was in a fricking pageant a decade ago. The fact you do is kinda sad.


He is running for president, so it's part of his record to evaluate. The fact of the matter is that he is willing to acquiesce to deranged lunatics who are living out a sexual fetish at everyone's expense. And he is willing to cede ground on something that is foundational to western civilization and humanity itself.

But muh bonus depreciation!
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

He does not.


Lie.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75166 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:39 am to
quote:

He does not.


Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49050 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:40 am to
quote:

He is running for president, so it's part of his record to evaluate.


Pageant entries are part of what you evaluate when picking who to vote for?


quote:

But muh bonus depreciation!

And you care more about that than tax policy?! Holy shite.
This post was edited on 9/15/23 at 9:43 am
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28202 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:41 am to
quote:

He does not answer "No" to the question.

He answers No to whether a man can give birth, then equivocates on even that


It's at best a halfway answer to a question that any self-respecting man should have the balls to answer clearly.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:43 am to
quote:

He clearly says no. And his reason is a man can’t give birth


The issue is this skates too close to the Trans talking point whether he or you realize it. Defining a woman solely by "giving birth" allows the Trans lobby to start dishonestly suggesting that if that's the case women born with defects that can't give birth must not be women, or women that have had hysterectomies, etc.

This is parsing words when there is no need, and you ought to know this.

"No, obviously not," is the only acceptable answer and anything more than that is a waste of air.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:43 am to
quote:

He clearly says a man cannot be a woman


Quote him.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28202 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:44 am to
Well his most recent career has been as a reality TV show host and as an entertainer. I know you're part of the Oz wing of the party as long as you get muh bonus depreciation.

Culture matters, and it's currently severely diseased. Trump has been an active participant in that.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116993 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Lie.


He does not.

He equivocates. He rambles and then says PART of it is giving birth and that men can't give birth, and then qualifies it.

That is not a NO to the actual question. That is a fact.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28202 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:46 am to
quote:

The issue is this skates too close to the Trans talking point whether he or you realize it. Defining a woman solely by "giving birth" allows the Trans lobby to start dishonestly suggesting that if that's the case women born with defects that can't give birth must not be women, or women that have had hysterectomies, etc.

This is parsing words when there is no need, and you ought to know this.

"No, obviously not," is the only acceptable answer and anything more than that is a waste of air.


It's obvious it shows he doesn't have any socially conservative convictions. He doesn't have principles. None of the other GOP candidates, not even Vivek, would struggle with the question the way Trump did like a sniveling little pussy. And it lines up with how cowardly he is on guns.
This post was edited on 9/15/23 at 9:47 am
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 9/15/23 at 9:46 am to
quote:

It's at best a halfway answer to a question that any self-respecting man should have the balls to answer clearly.


Correct, which is why it's funny to find so many regulars here doing mental gymnastics to suggest this is the kind of answer they'd give.

Yes...I can imagine this would go great as an answer down at the camp, right?
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram