Started By
Message
locked post

Trump administration will announce it’s ending fuel economy negotiations with California.

Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:08 am
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53473 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:08 am
Lmao!!!

The Trump administration will soon announce the end of negotiations with California regarding a proposed rollback of Obama-era fuel economy regulations, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.

LINK
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:09 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 10:32 am
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24773 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:13 am to
quote:

The freeze would prevent about 1,000 traffic fatalities a year and save $500 billion in societal costs, according to EPA and DOT estimates. That proposal also laid the groundwork for EPA to revoke California’s ability to set its own tailpipe standards for carbon dioxide emissions.


Thank you, President Trump!
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98872 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:15 am to
I love that man.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73827 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

what you are laughing at?


Gavin Newsom and how much of a d bag he is
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
7544 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:

The freeze would prevent about 1,000 traffic fatalities a year


Is it just me, but what does changing the fuel economy standards have to do with traffic fatalities?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24773 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:20 am to
People driving less and being able to afford newer safer cars.

New standards would raise the cost of vehicles and people would opt to stay in older, less safe vehicles.

This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 10:23 am
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:23 am to
Hooray for the Interstate Commerce clause!

So much for States' Rights.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95754 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:23 am to
The Law of Unintended Consequences seems to be in full effect this week.

Newsome better quit while he is ahead.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9604 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:25 am to
quote:

People driving less and being able to afford newer safer cars. New standards would raise the cost of vehicles and people would opt to stay in older, less safe vehicles.

Reach much
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24773 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Hooray for the Interstate Commerce clause! So much for States' Rights.


Yep, auto manufacturers should make cars to comply with all 50 states' fuel efficiency mandates.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24773 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Reach much


A little reachy, but logical.

More people using safe public transportation, etc.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 10:30 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54212 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:01 am to
quote:

Reach much


No, he isn't. If you care to read the preceding paragraph in the link

quote:

In August, the Trump administration proposed freezing fuel economy standards at 37 miles per gallon in 2020 on grounds Obama-era standard raised car prices, forcing people to drive older, less safe vehicles.


just what other conclusion is one to arrive at?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79717 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Hooray for the Interstate Commerce clause!

So much for States' Rights.


Gee, you sound disenchanted.
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Hooray for the Interstate Commerce clause!

So much for States' Rights.


For once, I trust my federal government more than my state government.

However, it's hard to argue that the commerce clause hasnt morphed into an overreaching and overbearing beast.

I agree with that beast for now though, so I'll allow it.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:15 am to
quote:

For once, I trust my federal government more than my state government. However, it's hard to argue that the commerce clause hasnt morphed into an overreaching and overbearing beast. I agree with that beast for now though, so I'll allow it.

You sound like a Democrat.
Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
7974 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Is it just me, but what does changing the fuel economy standards have to do with traffic fatalities?


Also for new cars, bigger cars (that burn more fuel) are inherently safer. There are exceptions but as long as F=MxA that will generally hold true.
This post was edited on 2/20/19 at 11:17 am
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

You sound like a Democrat.

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:51 am to
quote:

That's racist

So? Is that illegal or something?
Posted by TSLG
Member since Mar 2014
6724 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

So? Is that illegal or something?


You don't do jokes or sarcasm very well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram