Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

‘Treated like a criminal:’ Witnesses testify on abuse of Flock cameras

Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4352 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:30 pm
what a nightmare.....


‘Treated like a criminal:’ Witnesses testify on abuse of Flock cameras


(The Center Square) – Advocates of the growing network of AI-driven surveillance cameras argue the technology can help make communities across the U.S. safer.

But the controversial cameras have also wreaked havoc on the lives of innocent American citizens, including Florida resident Lindsey Isaacs, who spent 13 days in jail and received severe media attention for a crime she didn’t commit.

Isaacs told her story to U.S. lawmakers during a Wednesday Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism hearing, revealing how an image captured and stored by a Flock Safety camera cost her seven months of unmerited hardship.

“I was terrified,” a tearful Isaacs recalled. “I was facing the possibility of spending the rest of my life in prison for a crash that I knew I had not been involved in. I did not know if I would ever get out of jail. At my lowest point, I didn’t want to be alive.”

The Palm Coast resident awoke around 1:45 a.m. on Oct. 5, 2025, to state troopers outside of her apartment and a tow truck confiscating her car.

Police had used images captured by an Automated License Plate Reader camera operated by Flock Safety, she later learned, to misidentify her as the perpetrator of a fatal car accident the day prior.

Despite crash witnesses reporting the perpetrator’s car was a different color than Isaacs’ and despite the lack of damage to her car, police issued a warrant for her arrest on April 17, 2026.

For three days, Isaacs said, she was placed in solitary confinement and dressed in an ill-fitting suicide prevention gown that left her exposed on one side. After spending an additional 24 hours in a mental health unit, Isaacs was transferred to a maximum-security housing unit, where she stayed for 10 days.

While there, she watched her mugshot appear on the news, endured harassment from other inmates, and was denied bond at a pre-trial detention hearing.

Only when her attorney was able to present photos to the judge of her possessed vehicle — which, contrary to the claims of the troopers who possessed it, showed no damage — was Isaacs’ case reevaluated.

LINK
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28911 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:32 pm to
Horrible story, but this is all on the investigators misapplying evidence. Her car was in perfect condition and they documented her car had damage consistent with a crash.

I'm against flock cameras, btw.

Whoever wrote that report should face what she was facing. Would stop that shite real quick.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12718 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:36 pm to
There needs to be a class action suit against them.

Flock Isn’t Public, But the Cameras Are—and One Unit’s Data Is Out

quote:

Flock Safety’s automated license-plate readers are now one of the biggest privately constructed surveillance systems on the roads in the United States. The company, which is legally known as Flock Group Inc., is headquartered in Atlanta and was established in 2017 by Georgia Tech graduates Garrett Langley (who is the CEO), Matt Feury, and Paige Todd. Purchases by homeowner associations came first, after which police departments joined.

Flock is not a publicly traded company; it has no ticker symbol and has not announced an IPO. The company is controlled by its founders and by its venture investors. Among the investors who have been disclosed are Y Combinator, Matrix Partners, Meritech, Andreessen Horowitz, Tiger Global, Bedrock, and Greenoaks. Valuations in the private market were reported as being around $7.5 billion following a $275 million financing in 2025 and about $8.4 billion in April 2026.

It earns money through leasing rather than by selling the cameras outright. The package—covering hardware, software, the cellular connection, cloud storage, and maintenance—is priced at around $2,400 to $2,500 per camera each year, together with a few hundred dollars for installation. Flock generally retains ownership of the device.

There is no single federal statute relating to ALPRs. In some of the 2026 rulings, limited captures of license plates on public roads were regarded as not constituting a “search”. In other cases, it has been claimed that querying a vehicle’s location history over a period of time amounts to mosaic tracking under Carpenter and therefore requires a warrant. The officers have also used the system to keep track of romantic partners. The cities have the option of canceling their contracts. The “Flock-Off Act” introduced by Representative Thomas Massie is aimed at cutting off federal funding, not at establishing a national ban.

The public has no facility for browsing the network; sharing with other agencies has to be opted in for. New law-enforcement customers are directed to a seven-day default retention. Residents themselves cannot obtain their own plate history from Flock. When the public-records law is applicable, they can request contracts and search audit logs from a government customer—not every image.

On the 16th of September, the group known as stegan0gram took away one camera and handed the files over to 404 Media and WIRED. The data stored by that unit amounted to about 21 days’ worth of logs: approximately 50,200 vehicles and 1.6 million images. A portion of the storage was not encrypted, including a key that was used to unlock the media. The software also identified people and bicycles. Flock regarded the removal as illegal.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/flock-isnt-public-cameras-are-one-units-data/
Posted by Doak Walker
Dallas
Member since Sep 2022
745 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 2:51 pm to
Sad story, but if the facts in her case are true as represented, a decent lawyer should be able to make sure she never has to work another day in her life. Juries do not like it when law enforcement lies.
Posted by alabamabuckeye
Member since Jun 2010
22493 posts
Posted on 9/24/26 at 3:37 pm to
Flock cameras are unconstitutional and they should all be destroyed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram