- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/5/18 at 9:38 am to JudgeHolden
quote:You implied it.
I didn’t say that.
But taking it you're being honest, and actually do appreciate the problem with present corruption at the Bureau, how would you propose rooting it out and fixing it?
The OP suggested US Marshalls be employed.
What investigative body would you suggest?
Does an FBI investigation of itself not invite further corruption?
Posted on 5/5/18 at 10:33 am to NC_Tigah
Well, if you want my honest answer . . . .
You have two options as President.
1). Restructure the Agency.
— replace all appointed officials in the agency. Not all at once, but over a couple of years.
—hire some serious people to advise on replacements.
— THREATEN to increase congressional oversight. This is the last thing serious (and non corrupt) people in the agency want. They will clean up their own house in response.
— Ironically, expand it. Engage in new hiring with guidelines for recruitment. In fifteen years, you’ll have an agency more like you want.
2). Your other option. Do nothing. Let the process play out. Career officers are interested in domestic crime and terrorism, not in quasi-political squabbles.
What you don’t do is what Trump did. You don’t try to strong arm the director and then make public statements that sound just like a perp to every sentient FBI agent.
I don’t know if Trump is innocent or guilty. I do know his handling of the FBI was ham handed.
You have two options as President.
1). Restructure the Agency.
— replace all appointed officials in the agency. Not all at once, but over a couple of years.
—hire some serious people to advise on replacements.
— THREATEN to increase congressional oversight. This is the last thing serious (and non corrupt) people in the agency want. They will clean up their own house in response.
— Ironically, expand it. Engage in new hiring with guidelines for recruitment. In fifteen years, you’ll have an agency more like you want.
2). Your other option. Do nothing. Let the process play out. Career officers are interested in domestic crime and terrorism, not in quasi-political squabbles.
What you don’t do is what Trump did. You don’t try to strong arm the director and then make public statements that sound just like a perp to every sentient FBI agent.
I don’t know if Trump is innocent or guilty. I do know his handling of the FBI was ham handed.
This post was edited on 5/5/18 at 10:34 am
Posted on 5/5/18 at 10:34 am to JudgeHolden
So you are NT74 and not boosie. Makes sense now
Posted on 5/5/18 at 10:37 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So you are NT74 and not boosie. Makes sense now
I’m neither. I’m an “errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill.”
Posted on 5/5/18 at 11:12 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
THREATEN to increase congressional oversight. This is the last thing serious (and non corrupt) people in the agency want. They will clean up their own house in response.
They won't. The people you allude to are below the SES level and the SES level is one of the main problems.
quote:
Your other option. Do nothing. Let the process play out. Career officers are interested in domestic crime and terrorism, not in quasi-political squabbles.
This is not an option. The process will not correct the core problems. The process is rigged and has been for a long time now.
quote:
What you don’t do is what Trump did. You don’t try to strong arm the director and then make public statements that sound just like a perp to every sentient FBI agent.
Somewhat agree. Trump should have adopted the 'walk softly and carry a big stick approach'.
Posted on 5/5/18 at 11:16 am to The Baker
I don't know why we needed an FBI in the first place.
The Marshalls have been there since the beginning of the republic.
The Marshalls have been there since the beginning of the republic.
Posted on 5/5/18 at 11:19 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
If you don’t like the FBI,
Yeah, it's about this
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News