Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 3/4/17 at 3:19 pm to
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
17344 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Trump could've parsed his tweets better but he's dead on towards what a piece of shite Obama really is.


He needed the element of controversy to draw fire from the media. Otherwise they'd never cover it.

You can't deny that the focus has shifted to wiretapping today. That's partially because conservative media outlets started asking relevant questions last week. A lot of it is because Trump tweeted about it this morning.
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 3:20 pm
Posted by deuceiswild
South La
Member since Nov 2007
4593 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

If no real evidence, keep silent.


I agree with everything you've said in this thread.

I believe that there really is evidence. I believe Trump. The problem is that said evidence will never be allowed to be made public. The ramifications would be embarrassing for a LOT of people. And in the end Trump looks bad for making the accusation.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

I believe that there really is evidence. I believe Trump. The problem is that said evidence will never be allowed to be made public
POTUS has absolute authority to declassify anything he wants, for any reason, not subject to review.

If Trump doesn't do this, he's full of shite. (Hint: He won't and he is.)
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
19277 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 4:02 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:53 pm
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 4:07 pm to
Let's just call it inductive reasoning.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
24843 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 4:12 pm to
Do any of the people who hate Trump think he is a forgive and forget kinda guy? Obama and his people better hope this untrue. They are attacking the one thing he values over money, his reputation. I find it hard to believe he would say this with nothing more than a few newspapers reports.

Let Justice Be Done, Though the Heavens Fall
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10607 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 4:12 pm to
I believe you. Can you let me know when the tax cuts are coming. Asking for a friend. You seem pretty dialed in.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Let's just call it inductive reasoning.




or something you pulled from your arse


Whether or not their is evidence the seriousness of the charge reuires an investigation!

This will put pressure on the Republican pantloads like Miss Linsey and the useful idiot
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38890 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

He needed the element of controversy to draw fire from the media. Otherwise they'd never cover it. You can't deny that the focus has shifted to wiretapping today. That's partially because conservative media outlets started asking relevant questions last week. A lot of it is because Trump tweeted about it this morning.


There it is.

I can remember an outrage a day by the Obama Regime; all the while Bureaucracies and Courts and Regulations were being constructed to accomplish their "fundamental change" agenda.

Obama could never employ the direct Tweet method...because his whole MSM Meme was LIE-BASED. Hell, what times he spoke (Benghazi, ACA, Fast n Furious, et al), he got in trouble.

Trump tells truth...albeit, in a relatively crude manner some times. Lethal truths...that will send the MSM into a tither trying to counter. While behind the scenes...things happen.

The best defense is a good offense.
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

appears that the crux of the argument comes from reporting that U.S. officials secretly monitored a computer server in Trump Tower to determine if there were links to Russian banks. A New York Times article published on Jan. 19 – just one day before Trump’s inauguration – reported that U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies had intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a probe of links between Trump’s campaign and Russian officials.

There has been no definitive reporting, however, that any phone lines belonging to the Trump campaign were tapped.



/Thread

LINK

More lies from Trump.

Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

definitive reporting


You're an idiot to have included this.

quote:

More lies from Leftistas.


fify
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
19277 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:24 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:53 pm
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:32 pm to
Is @real hitting the crack pipe now? This is a serious allegation. To tweet it instead of initiating a formal investigation is lunacy.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
19277 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:35 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:52 pm
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

The best defense is a good offense.





This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 5:53 pm
Posted by HeadCoach
Shady's Parking Lot
Member since Mar 2009
5659 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:44 pm to
Distract, deflect, distract. So let me get this straight... the acting president may have had surveillance on a bad hombre, who would later become president, and though the only "source" at this point seems to be Brietbart, THIS is McCarthyism?
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

How are you so sure that's not in the works?


I have no idea one way or the other. The point is, it shouldn't be tweeted in this childish way. It ought to be formally announced along with the investigation into it. If it's baseless, @real may be setting himself up for a shitstorm of legal reprisal, if a sitting president can in fact be sued for shitposting under his personal Twitter account.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
19277 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:46 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 7:52 pm
Posted by zacata88
Member since Mar 2014
1682 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:59 pm to
This board is made up of a bunch of complete and total fricking idiots. There is no proof (or even suggestion) that Obama did this, and even if it were true, Donald's total melt (as per usual) is the absolute wrong way of handling it.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
57812 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:00 pm to
What has more admissible evidence? Trump with the FISA warrants or the media with the russia accusations?
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 25
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 25Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram