- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters issues statement from Colorado prison.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You mean the election fraud? Oh wait, you have some delusion that the judge somehow proved there wasn't in this case. Just like your delusion about the 14th amendment
This
quote:
J6 prove they aren't
You can't be serious. There's no way at this point, after everything that's been uncovered, you still think there was some sort of actual "insurrection." Wow. We're about to start a whole new avenue of your idiotic takes
Sigh. Here we go.
SFP, list all the reasons you think there was an actual "insurrection" on Jan 6th
0
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Like with basically every post-election venture trying to prove the fraud
Except that PLENTY of election fraud has been discovered. Hell, more keeps being found even this year, this long after the election. The only person worse than you on this board is that medicalgrind buffoon.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:That tends to happen when the powers that be are the ones committing the fraud, genius
NOTHING has come from it
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:18 pm to c on z
quote:Interesting. I'm ready to listen to your proof
It’s 2025, and people are still believing debunked claims of election fraud in this particular instance
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Says who? You? Well, your brain doesn't work right so, I don't trust you
The records were never threatened
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Has anyone noticed SFP won't respond to me? Hmmm.
Someone ask SFP about the 14th amendment. IT'S A HOOT
Someone ask SFP about the 14th amendment. IT'S A HOOT
Posted on 10/2/25 at 8:48 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
ReauxlTide222
Do you hear something?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:14 pm to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, Tina
What if she’s right?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
You were wrong the first time we had this discussion and you are still wrong. She was the clerk and recorder over the elections in mesa county. Preserving election results and appointing the team to extract the election results from the voting machines was literally her duty and in her job description. I posted the multiple links before showing that and you still denied it. Like I said you were wrong then and you are wrong now.
This post was edited on 10/2/25 at 9:46 pm
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:50 pm to MikkUGA
There is a proper procedure to storing records. She did not follow them.
There was no threat to the records, let alone a threat justifying her fraudulent behavior.
If she had legal access, she wouldn't have had to use a 3rd party ID fraudulently.
She never had the legal authority to give the data to third parties. Again, there is a process for becoming a validated/approved vendor for such action. She chose a random Lindell crony.
There was no threat to the records, let alone a threat justifying her fraudulent behavior.
If she had legal access, she wouldn't have had to use a 3rd party ID fraudulently.
She never had the legal authority to give the data to third parties. Again, there is a process for becoming a validated/approved vendor for such action. She chose a random Lindell crony.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
The original hard drives with Mesa County's 2020 election data were copied without authorization in 2021 by then-county clerk Tina Peters, and some of the data was later distributed publicly. The original, compromised equipment was subsequently decertified and replaced by the Colorado Secretary of State's office.
She was authorized to copy voting data from the hard drives. She was authorized to appoint the team to copy the data from the hard drives. It was literally her job to do that and preserve the data. How convenient that now they confiscated the copies and destroyed the originals to cover their tracks. They had ZERO authorization to do that. BY LAW that data has to be preserved. I proved you wrong the last time you spewed this bs.
She was authorized to copy voting data from the hard drives. She was authorized to appoint the team to copy the data from the hard drives. It was literally her job to do that and preserve the data. How convenient that now they confiscated the copies and destroyed the originals to cover their tracks. They had ZERO authorization to do that. BY LAW that data has to be preserved. I proved you wrong the last time you spewed this bs.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:57 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
She was authorized to copy voting data from the hard drives
If she was, why did she turn the cameras off to hide her actions?
Why did she have to use a fraudulent ID from a third party to access the data?
quote:
s. She was authorized to appoint the team to copy the data from the hard drives.
Why didn't her "team" have legitimate access?
What authority did she have to give the data to random third parties?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 9:58 pm to MikkUGA
I think it’s clear to any reasonable person that Ms. Peters is a political prisoner and has been disproportionately sentenced.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
If she had legal access? She was the clerk and recorder of elections dumbass. She had legal access. The corrupt democrats in Mesa county were trying to prevent her from preserving the election data. Now whh were they trying to prevent her from doing her job. The amount of corruption in that county around her and that trial is astonishing. BY LAW the election records must be preserved so where are they. They need to produce the original hard drives if they are claiming her copies are tampered or fraudulent.
This post was edited on 10/2/25 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:03 pm to MikkUGA
Aren’t the election records and results public records? How can you be prosecuted for disclosing what is supposed to be a public record?
The “crime” makes no sense to me.
The “crime” makes no sense to me.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:05 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
If she had legal access? She was the clerk and recorder of elections dumbass. She had legal access.
Then why use the fraudulent credentials of another person?
Why didn't she have proper credentials to access the data?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:06 pm to Riverside
quote:
The “crime” makes no sense to me.
What about using fraud to impersonate someone with proper credentials to access a computer system? Does that make sense to you as a crime ?
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
If she already has access to the records, then does it matter if she logs on under her name or someone else? Seems like a stretch. I also don’t understand how this “crime” warrants 8 years in prison for a woman in her 60s with no prior criminal history.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
She literally is the person that appoints who can come in and copy the data. I don't give a frick if she brought Shrek in there. It was literally her job to appoint that person. Maybe they were stonewalling her on getting the badges. Honestly if she is the person that its their job to make sure the records are preserved and her job to appoint the person or persons to do the job then they don't need credentials because she would have escort privilege.Instead of them worrying about copies she made why do they not just produce the originals. She made copies of an election that already happened.
This post was edited on 10/2/25 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 10/2/25 at 10:22 pm to Riverside
quote:
If she already has access to the records
She didn't.
Hence why she has to engage in fraud to access them.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News