re: Tim Kaine Suggests He’ll Oppose Ban on Infanticide

quote:

---

Killing babies is still illegal.

---

Just like you didnt say kasich 2020

quote:

---

Explain Vermont a-hole. That is the fricking endgame.

---

Vermont goes far further than I would personally support, but (unlike some) I DO believe in a federal system and thus that each State should be able to pass the laws that reflect the views of its cirizenry ... whether I agree with those laws or not.

quote:

---

What is your opinion on the Vermont bill

---

I think they're assholes, but I don't live in Vermont and I will never support the federal government overstepping.

quote:

---

finally admitting

---

I've never denied saying that.

I made fun of you for being a dumbass and after several years, you still don't get it.

Because you're a dumbass.

Link it, champ.

quote:

---

I will never support the federal government overstepping.

---

The Fed Govt passing a law saying you can't murder babies is overstepping.



If Ohio passed a bill saying it is ok to murder gays, would you be ok with the Fed Govt "overstepping?"

In this thread “conservative hank” supports states rights to murder kids. In the next thread he details why each state having 2 senators is bad.



The modern day left ladies and gentleman.

I honestly cannot decide whether you are simply disingenuous or instead one of the dumbest human beings with whom I have ever interacted.

1. I have never called myself a conservative. I am a libertarian.

2. Your LOVE of emotion-laden language (murder) would do a Dem proud. I have never advocated for affirmatively ending the life of a post-natal child. I do believe that each State should have the right to determine when (or if) it should be legal to terminate a fetus, which has no legal rights of its own.

3. I NEVER said that having two Senators per State is bad. I SAID that I support that system, but that I understand the argument against it. I have also said that the Constitutional amendment process is certainly applicable to this issue, should 3/4 of the States want to change the system.

quote:

---

1. You're dodging the question calling out your own idiotic position that the Fed declaring infanticide as illigal is "overstepping"

---

quote:

---

idiotic

---

quote:

---

illigal

---

Classic.

quote:

---

Don't dodge

---

You don't know what this means.

If I eat spaghetti, should abortion be legal?

Don't dodge.

quote:

---

quote:

---

I have never advocated for affirmatively ending the life of a post-natal child. I do believe that each State should have the right to determine when (or if) it should be legal to terminate a fetus, which has no legal rights of its own.

---

So personhood is defined by location?

---

No. You are conflating the philosophical concept of "personhood" with the LEGAL question of defining abortion rights.

"Personhood" is defined by the the shared mores of a given group of people. Yes, that group of people CAN be defined by geography, and they CAN enact laws in that location consistent with their philosophy/ideology.

quote:

---

What day (say?) you in regards to Vermont being able to abort a 34 week pregnancy?

---

Personally, I would not support that regimen and would not choose to live under it.

But, again, laws should reflect the views of the persons who live under them. If the people of Vermont think that 34-week abortion is reasonable, that is their right.