Started By
Message

re: Through sworn testimony today in GA, 147,000 votes are invalid if the law is followed.

Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:53 am to
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2811 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Don't over react to this.


No, of course not... let's underreact to it. Don't want to seem to conspiracy theorist-y, right?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48915 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:53 am to
quote:

What is funny is you trying to pretend there wasn’t intentional fraud and/or abuse of the system.


quote:

I've never said there wasn't.


quote:

We need to work towards fixing inherent flaws, but that does not mean there was intentional fraud or abuse of the system. It's just a flawed system
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48915 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

I'm a contrarian, which this board obviously cannot handle.


this “board” handles you just fine. You’re not nearly as bright as you think you are. Poor mans Hank.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2811 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

There were ballots with no signature verification.
There were ballots with no chain of custody.
There were ballots that were mailed in but were not folded nor on the correct ballot paper
There were ballots created out of thin air during a hand recount
There were duplicate ballots that were counted
There were ballots that were found to be massed produced with the oval filled in perfectly like a laser printer.
There were ballots that were found to have the exact same Write in candidate with exact same handwriting match.
There were drop boxes that did not have any video footage even though required by law.


"Muh NO PROOF!!!" "NO FRAUD!" "BIG LIE!" "OMB!" "BAD CANDIDATE!"
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39683 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:56 am to
Have you seen the recent weekly voter registration reports coming out of Texas? Hundreds of thousands of new registrations per week with at least half of them having non-matched names/ss# or confirmed dead.

But there's no fraud people. Its all just a #biglie
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2811 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 10:56 am to
Kemp was the better uniparty/Deep State operative. That's why.
Posted by LegalEazyE
Madison, Wisconsin
Member since Nov 2023
2811 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:06 am to
quote:


quote:
We need to work towards fixing inherent flaws, but that does not mean there was intentional fraud or abuse of the system. It's just a flawed system


oh my.


Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20069 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 11:25 am to
quote:

It's just a flawed system (I'm not saying there wasn't fraud, I'm saying flaws in the system don't prove fraud)


And I’m saying that flaws in the system that do not mitigate fraud lead to incredible results. Fraud doesn’t have to be proven, this is a court of public opinion, not a court of law.

quote:

And you would think someone would have looked into this since the issue was raised in 2020, and we have had elections since then. I suspect the answer is out there.


This is the topic at hand.

quote:

Quick aside, I don't know what you are referencing as never wanting to come back to.


Pay attention this time.

quote:

Um, that question was asked and answered a long time ago. The law does not require the poll workers to wait on the poll watchers.


The law is not the same as the control environment. They let the mitigating control walk out. Whether it is against the law, and whether it produced credible results are different issues.

Similar to various ethical bodies that exist to regulate professions and industries, the standards set can be violated and punished, outside of any laws that exist (outside of laws that allow those bodies to do so at their discretion).

quote:

That is a weird assumption you have made about me that is totally off base.


It’s not an assumption, it’s an observation based on the apparent dissonance you have in accepting the points made above.

quote:

But this board sees a tweet and declares Trump the true president. I ask if there are any details, but I'm the one who lacks critical thinking?


Please listen: claiming the results are not credible, or illegitimate, is not the same as claiming the alternative result is the actual result.

There are people that fall into a similar fallacy, that jump straight to the conclusion that if they don’t believe the results, then the opposite of what was reported is true. You arent wrong in that regard.

But when you have one side that is actively overriding the controls, its not off base to assume that the results are fraudulent. The appearance of fraud is functionally the same as actual fraud.
This post was edited on 4/4/24 at 11:30 am
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2244 posts
Posted on 4/4/24 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

That dude is a typical hypocrite liberal who writes out long posts without saying anything and pats himself on the back for being a goose stepper.

Like sfp does

Removed the edit
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram