- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on Catholic Church's Economic Philosophy
Posted on 4/29/14 at 12:06 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Posted on 4/29/14 at 12:06 pm to JEAUXBLEAUX
Face the facts son.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 12:13 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
Man should be able to privately own his property, but those who own private property should use it in a way that promotes the common good
Voluntarily
Posted on 4/29/14 at 1:10 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Voluntarily
I agree
and the only time that an authoritative entity should step in is when it limits someone's freedom or affects someone's private property.
for example: someone is putting out lots of pollution, a neighbor should be able to bring him to court because of the things he is doing on his private property affects someone else's private property.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 5:51 pm to Eric Cartman
You defined it but hardly showed it is a core Church philosophy.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 8:41 pm to Tigah in the ATL
Socialists agree that people should have personal private property such as personal belongs, a home, a car, etc and that people can own their own businesses like a restaurant, bar, store, auto repair and so on, but when property is not used to satisfy human need but used to accumulate excess property and capital and then used to exploit others it's wrong.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 8:50 pm to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Socialists agree that people should have personal private property such as personal belongs, a home, a car, etc and that people can own their own businesses like a restaurant, bar, store, auto repair and so on, but when property is not used to satisfy human need but used to accumulate excess property and capital and then used to exploit others it's wrong.
It's also wrong to steel property, which socialist promote though the guise of government.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 11:31 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
Obama can't be the anti-christ, he is not a Roman and won't be a head of the revived Roman Empire ( European Union ).
He very well might be the “ John the Baptist ” of the dark side. ( One who made the path clear ) The USA must lose all her credibilty, power and economic pull in order for the European Union to become the big dog, and Obama is certainly making that happen, rather quickly.
4 blood moons! A tetrad... always on a Jewish holiday...
Coincidence? I think not, dumazzes!!!!
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:12 am to Eric Cartman
Capitalism and Socialism are both products of the European "enlightenment" and as such they are both poor and injust models.
I am a believer in Distributism as the best economic philosophy, at least theoretically.
The focus should be on property ownership for everyone instead of corporatocracy and a "fair share" tax system.
I am a believer in Distributism as the best economic philosophy, at least theoretically.
The focus should be on property ownership for everyone instead of corporatocracy and a "fair share" tax system.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:53 am to McLovin NOLA
quote:
Capitalism and Socialism are both products of the European "enlightenment" and as such they are both poor and injust models.
I am a believer in Distributism as the best economic philosophy, at least theoretically.
The focus should be on property ownership for everyone instead of corporatocracy and a "fair share" tax system.
ok theoretically it could be the best
but does it work in the real world.
we know capitalism is very effective in the real world. can Distributism do the same?
how do you make sure that everyone has property?
Popular
Back to top

0






