- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This Kav situation isn't really new. The Left has been telling you this for years
Posted on 9/21/18 at 11:16 am
Posted on 9/21/18 at 11:16 am
People just weren't hearing what they were saying.
When the left looked at stats like in the military relating to Sexual Assault and then told you things like, "only X% of those accusations result in conviction", they were telling you that they were unhappy with the results of DUE PROCESS! They were telling you, "we expect you to change the process enough so that we can convict more easily".
When they told you that vigorously questioning the accuser amounted to "blaming the victim" or "bullying", they were telling you that you are guilty until proven innocent.
When they responded to basically EVERY man who ever denied an allegation by calling on THE MAN to prove he was telling the truth, they told you that they believed in guilty until proven innocent.
They also believe this same paradigm when it comes to racism accusations against whites. They expect the accused to prove their innocence.
Hell, when they ran around with buttons saying, "I believe Anita Hill", they were telling you that evidence didn't matter. All that mattered was if the person seemed convincing when they told the story.
They're telling you that same thing now. They want testimony on a case that they can't tell us when, where, or around whom the case occurred. Why? I mean, none of us are mind readers. So, all we are going to do is listen to her and then a bunch of liberals are going to tell you she "sounds credible" which is actually a phrase without meaning. No one can simply "sound" credible.
The left has been telling you for YEARS............DECADES...........that they believe in show trials/career murdering/public humiliation.
It's nice that people might be noticing this now. But I've been calling this shite for 20 years.
When the left looked at stats like in the military relating to Sexual Assault and then told you things like, "only X% of those accusations result in conviction", they were telling you that they were unhappy with the results of DUE PROCESS! They were telling you, "we expect you to change the process enough so that we can convict more easily".
When they told you that vigorously questioning the accuser amounted to "blaming the victim" or "bullying", they were telling you that you are guilty until proven innocent.
When they responded to basically EVERY man who ever denied an allegation by calling on THE MAN to prove he was telling the truth, they told you that they believed in guilty until proven innocent.
They also believe this same paradigm when it comes to racism accusations against whites. They expect the accused to prove their innocence.
Hell, when they ran around with buttons saying, "I believe Anita Hill", they were telling you that evidence didn't matter. All that mattered was if the person seemed convincing when they told the story.
They're telling you that same thing now. They want testimony on a case that they can't tell us when, where, or around whom the case occurred. Why? I mean, none of us are mind readers. So, all we are going to do is listen to her and then a bunch of liberals are going to tell you she "sounds credible" which is actually a phrase without meaning. No one can simply "sound" credible.
The left has been telling you for YEARS............DECADES...........that they believe in show trials/career murdering/public humiliation.
It's nice that people might be noticing this now. But I've been calling this shite for 20 years.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:10 pm to ShortyRob
The D attitude on this topic, is really and truly the same bias and attitude that got black men lynched for looking the wrong way at a white woman back when.
The left's talking points have basically been - we should believe the "credible" Ford, because everyone knows white men cannot control their sexual urges, and believe they are entitled to sex from a woman.
I am a white woman. I watch these people talking about Brett Kav, and they could be talking about my dad, brother, uncles, colleagues, and lifelong friends. It is despicable.
The prejudice and blind hate of white guys by these people smearing Kav is all the evidence necessary. It's a presumption only rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. E.g. Duke Lacrosse Team; UVA Frat Boys; Title IX Procedures on disciplinary proceedings in Universities.
For the good of the Country, every Senator participating in this should be investigated for this unethical smear. It subverts Due Process and the Constitutional Appointment Process.
It does not ever end well.
The left's talking points have basically been - we should believe the "credible" Ford, because everyone knows white men cannot control their sexual urges, and believe they are entitled to sex from a woman.
I am a white woman. I watch these people talking about Brett Kav, and they could be talking about my dad, brother, uncles, colleagues, and lifelong friends. It is despicable.
The prejudice and blind hate of white guys by these people smearing Kav is all the evidence necessary. It's a presumption only rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. E.g. Duke Lacrosse Team; UVA Frat Boys; Title IX Procedures on disciplinary proceedings in Universities.
For the good of the Country, every Senator participating in this should be investigated for this unethical smear. It subverts Due Process and the Constitutional Appointment Process.
It does not ever end well.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:12 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The D attitude on this topic, is really and truly the same bias and attitude that got black men lynched for looking the wrong way at a white woman back when.
The parallels between the thought processes are shocking.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:17 pm to Wednesday
quote:
The D attitude on this topic, is really and truly the same bias and attitude that got black men lynched for looking the wrong way at a white woman back when.
I don’t know where this thought process is coming from. It’s not like those in the south who prosecuted blacks were democrats. They’re all republicans in the south!
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:24 pm to Wednesday
quote:Selling America on the idea that men fundamentally resent women is the most asinine tenant of leftist ideology. Men and women are different sides of the same coin. Why the hell would I want bad things for women just because I’m a white man? My mother is a woman. My only sibling is a woman and my fiancé is a woman. Hell every teacher I had until I was probably 15 was a woman. It’s nonsensical.
I am a white woman. I watch these people talking about Brett Kav, and they could be talking about my dad, brother, uncles, colleagues, and lifelong friends. It is despicable.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 12:36 pm to beaverfever
quote:
Selling America on the idea that men fundamentally resent women is the most asinine tenant of leftist ideology.
They can't figure out that they cannot "sell" a bunch of white women who love and who are married to white men, or who raise them as sons, or who count them as friends and family - that these men are somehow horrible.
Women are most vicious when they get territorial. Get between a woman and her husband - or even worse her son, and she will take your arse out.
It's why white women never turned on Trump. And why these dumb arse white women senators (Collins, et al) do not need to worry about losing them if they back Kav.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 1:09 pm to rickyh
quote:
Whitey is the devil
Not quite....., more specifically as of late it's old white men.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News