Started By
Message

re: They Have Taken Out Trump's Website As Well

Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:50 am to
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11062 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:50 am to
Silencing conservatives, including the POTUS, on social media platforms does not constitute as infringing on our first amendment rights? Interesting. What does constitute infringement in your mind, oh wise one?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19456 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:50 am to
Working for me currently
Posted by thermal9221
Youngsville
Member since Feb 2005
15102 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:51 am to
Because the site works dumb frick.
Posted by Leroy_Jethro_Gibbs
Member since Dec 2020
61 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:51 am to
Not working here. Tried Safari and Firefox both.

iPhone
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
33489 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Because the site works dumb frick.



I have shown screenshots showing it is not for everyone as well as others stating so you Dumb frick!
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23900 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:54 am to
quote:

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, or that would prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
This post was edited on 1/9/21 at 9:56 am
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
19013 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Because the site works dumb frick.


This is apparently not the case, Mr. Genius, sir.
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
19013 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 10:05 am to
Not loading on Duck Duck Go either.
Posted by Paddyshack
Land of the Free
Member since Sep 2015
11062 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 10:06 am to
So you agree we should remove Section 230? Or at least revise it?
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23900 posts
Posted on 1/9/21 at 10:09 am to
quote:

you agree we should remove Section 230


I don’t know why this was passed in the first place. It’s a green light for news aggregators to relay inaccuracies with no repercussions.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram