- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There are some posters noticeably absent today...
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:31 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I tend to agree that it should be a high-level decision
Define “high-level”.
2
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:35 pm to Godfather1
quote:I know you asked Hank, but it should be from the desk of the president AND the Attorney General.
Define “high-level”.
That is how “high-level” it should be.
Raiding a former president’s home is not something that should be enacted by a fricking low level magistrate judge.
This post was edited on 8/9/22 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:37 pm to Scruffy
quote:
I know you asked Hank, but it should be from the desk of the president AND the Attorney General.
I agree.
I just want to hear HIM say it.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:39 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
When someone whined that I was using the Texas terminology (murder), rather than the Wisconsin terminology (homicide), I changed the phrasing for them.
This didn’t happen.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:40 pm to Godfather1
quote:From a purely policy-level perspective, the decision should be made as high (at least) as the Attorney General, probably as high as the President.
I tend to agree that it should be a high-level decisionquote:
Define “high-level”.
If that did not happen, it is not "illegal," but it certainly shows extremely poor political judgment.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:42 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Per the White House, it DID NOT happen.
If that did not happen
Whether you believe that or not is up to you, but if this was a rogue element in the FBI who “judge shopped” a low level magistrate judge (not even a federal judge), this is a partisan political nightmare.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:44 pm to Scruffy
quote:
There is plenty to comment at this point, with one major topic being the fact that no former president has ever had their home raided by the rival party in power in the 250 years of our Republic. Not once. Not even Nixon.
Why can’t y’all see that he’s just buying himself time??
The MSM hasn’t dropped their talking points yet so he really doesn’t have anything to go off of just yet..
As soon as they start REALLY spinning it, he will too. You’ll get your three paragraph word salad that says absolutely fricking nothing and he’ll expect you to accept it
Same song, same dance
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:45 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Per the White House, it DID NOT happen.
Nobody is stupid enough to believe this, are they?
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:47 pm to Scruffy
quote:I neither believe nor disbelieve at this point. I've not seen any evidence one way or the other.
If that did not happenquote:
Per the White House, it DID NOT happen. Whether you believe that or not is up to you,
quote:Agreed. Unlike the bulk of posters, I am just not rushing to judgment.
if this was a rogue element in the FBI who “judge shopped” a low level magistrate judge (not even a federal judge), this is a partisan political nightmare.
This post was edited on 8/9/22 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:47 pm to Flats
Honestly, it is significantly worse, IMO, if the WH didn’t sign off on it.
That means you have a rogue FBI element judge shopping to raid a former president’s home.
That means you have a rogue FBI element judge shopping to raid a former president’s home.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:48 pm to oogabooga68
Well they are clearly in the know and working on this case currently
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:48 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:Likely complete true.
As soon as they start REALLY spinning it, he will too. You’ll get your three paragraph word salad that says absolutely fricking nothing and he’ll expect you to accept it
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:48 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Honestly, it is significantly worse, IMO, if the WH didn’t sign off on it.
That means you have a rogue FBI element judge shopping to raid a former president’s home.
Which means that nobody’s minding the shop.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:52 pm to Scruffy
quote:Again, I agree 100%
Honestly, it is significantly worse, IMO, if the WH didn’t sign off on it.
That means you have a rogue FBI element judge shopping to raid a former president’s home.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:55 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
citizens who would rat out their neighbors to the State in a heartbeat.
excuse us!
1. you think the neighbors outed the former president? neighbors had nothing to do with the constant rumors during the trump era that he failed to care for paperwork and even tore it up. neighbors were not involved.
2. are you recommending that federal employees help hide the crimes of politicians who commit crimes against the state?
This post was edited on 8/9/22 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Agreed. Unlike the bulk of posters, I am just not rushing to judgment.
your instincts aren’t great. Posted on 8/9/22 at 12:58 pm to CelticDog
quote:I hate this terminology.
crimes against the state
If crimes were committed, they were committed against the citizens of this country, not against the amorphous concept of "The State."
Posted on 8/9/22 at 1:00 pm to CelticDog
quote:
CelticDog
88.1
Posted on 8/9/22 at 1:03 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Honestly, it is significantly worse, IMO, if the WH didn’t sign off on it.
That means you have a rogue FBI element judge shopping to raid a former president’s home.
I disagree; we can deal with a rogue FBI office (they won't, but that's another issue). This is systemic political targeting.
Posted on 8/9/22 at 1:06 pm to AggieHank86
Eric Holders statement, made virtually concurrently with the thug raid, is a good start of evidence
[and evidence of who is actually governing ILLEGALLY and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY
Baraq Obama needs to begin his new role as prison bitch
[and evidence of who is actually governing ILLEGALLY and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY
Baraq Obama needs to begin his new role as prison bitch
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News