re: The Voting Fraud is staggering

What kind of jacked up system allows for more than one ballot for a person, to be generated in the first place?

quote:

---

frick John Roberts.

---

Everyone supports federalism, until federalism works for the other side.

quote:

---

We are going to have a civil war

---

And one group will think its because the other doesn't want minorities to vote at all.

quote:

---

Roberts is *not* a federalist.

---

I have not read the opinions on EVERY one of these "election COVID accommodation" cases, but I read several of the early ones. Every one turned on the extent of the individual state's grant of emergency power by its own legislature.

And in each case, Roberts enforced the state's emergency power, as written. Where the local official overstepped, he voted to slap them down. Where the local official stayed within the bounds of the legislative grant of emergency power, Roberts ruled in his favor.

I have NOT read the latest from Pennsylvania, but the summary I saw DOES cause me to question whether the same hold true with THAT ruling. I just have not had the time to find the opinion and read it.

It was entertaining watching all the posts going back and forth between "Roberts is a cuck" and "does Roberts get his coat back," when every one of those rulings was entirely internally-consistent on the basis that I just outlined.

quote:

---

ver 375,000 duplicate mail in request already in PA

---

That sounds more like attempted fraud to me

I’m thinking I’ll either need to increase my medication OR add a second one. Not even joking.

quote:

---

Ok y’all don’t shoot me

---

There is no reason to shoot you.

The simple fact is that States retain the right to make the VAST majority of decisions regarding voting procedures, within the bounds of the Constitution. That certainly includes the procedures for early voting and absentee (or "mail-in") ballots.

Unfortunately, it probably also includes the systems put into place to do things like checking for duplicate ballots.

The Constitution just does not dictate uniformity in voting procedures, and it does not give the federal government as much power as some people want it to have.

quote:

---

Ok y’all don’t shoot me:

I get statesnrifhts but why aren’t state voting the same way in federal elections? Why can some states just mail ballots and other have to request? Why can’t there be computer systems to throw out duplicate votes??

---

Yes, there should be one uniform law for all the states in Federal elections, because graft and corruption in one state impacts the whole negatively. After all, these are FEDERAL offices we are talking about here, not state.
FWIW, one of the very few things the state government does well in my adopted state of Virginia is have state elections in odd years when there are no federal elections. All states should do this because it makes it easier to have one uniform law for federal elections. Just my take on this subject.

We are a voter ID state. I voted absentee yesterday. I had to present my ID, she looked me up in the computer and told me exactly how to sign my name (I go by my middle name but officially, I'm in the computer as my first name. We had to sign an affidavit as to why we were voting absentee, she gave us the ballot, we voted, she told us exactly how to fold the ballot in place it in the envelope. No lick, obviously. She had a sealer but thing that impressed me is you had to sign your name on the envelope but you had to continue your signature over the clasp of the envelope so they could tell whether or not it had been tampered with. Place it in a lock box.
Caveat that I can't guarantee is that the lock box shows up at the counting stations when it should. So, I am going to go vote again on the 4th with the dead democrats to offset those that have gone on before us.

I guess the good news is they are catching them rather than counting.