- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The three most cringe Charlie Kirk conspiracy theorists.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:20 pm to BoarEd
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:20 pm to BoarEd
quote:
I think what is even stranger are all of you people crying about people who question official narratives.
I've heard this argument before. I was told that not believing an outlandish theory means I am not thinking independently, just buying everything I'm told.
People do not have a problem with the Candace crew because they are questioning official narratives. It's because the ever-changing narratives they want us to believe are utterly retarded.
I've been a conspiracy theorist long before it became popular in the mainstream. But because I don't believe a certain theory, those decades of questioning are suddenly irrelevant. I have to believe everything someone else does or I'm just "attacking them for questioning the official narrative."
3
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:28 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
It's not an argument. The only person I'm even somewhat familiar with in the OP's lineup is Candace Owens and if not for this website I wouldn't even know who she is.
My point is that there is a trial over this shite underway. This shite should hopefully come out in the wash. But my own experience in "conspiracy theory" matters tells me it probably won't. That being the case, I'm open to hearing all sides of an issue before forming an opinion and what I have seen made abundantly clear on this site is that people don't like that approach. Overwhelmingly what happens is people denounce and slander anyone who calls into question anything other than the narrative that the transformer acted alone.
And I find that far more odd than any of the stupid shite Candace Owens has said that I've heard.
If anyone has paid even the slightest bit of attention to basically anything controversial over the years what they'll see is that the government lies to us about everything. As someone said earlier, the government has earned their distrust. Even from people like Candace Owens, no matter how stupid her theories may be or sound. They're earned by people who lie to us all as a matter of standard operating procedure.
My point is that there is a trial over this shite underway. This shite should hopefully come out in the wash. But my own experience in "conspiracy theory" matters tells me it probably won't. That being the case, I'm open to hearing all sides of an issue before forming an opinion and what I have seen made abundantly clear on this site is that people don't like that approach. Overwhelmingly what happens is people denounce and slander anyone who calls into question anything other than the narrative that the transformer acted alone.
And I find that far more odd than any of the stupid shite Candace Owens has said that I've heard.
If anyone has paid even the slightest bit of attention to basically anything controversial over the years what they'll see is that the government lies to us about everything. As someone said earlier, the government has earned their distrust. Even from people like Candace Owens, no matter how stupid her theories may be or sound. They're earned by people who lie to us all as a matter of standard operating procedure.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:43 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Overwhelmingly what happens is people denounce and slander anyone who calls into question anything other than the narrative that the transformer acted alone.
This isn’t true, ****. You just get your feelings hurt when you post dumb shite.
If you want to post evidence that the tranny lover had help or support, do that. Don’t post Gene texting Fred to bring some sod to the other side of campus and pretend it’s part of an international plot.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
This isn’t true
It is 100% true. And what's even funnier is that you folks (you know who you are) are so predictable at this point that a person could list who exactly will show up in what threads and what they will say.
In your case, you will show up in each and every thread that has anything to do with Charlie or Erika Kirk, or Candace Owens. I mean, like it's your frickin job. And you might post for an entire page ranting about something that you don't even frickin understand. You might make several posts trying to figure out exactly what it is you're even objecting to just to throw shite at the wall.
It's the weirdest thing ever.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:48 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It is 100% true. And what's even funnier is that you folks (you know who you are) are so predictable at this point that a person could list who exactly will show up in what threads and what they will say. In your case, you will show up in each and every thread that has anything to do with Charlie or Erika Kirk, or Candace Owens. I mean, like it's your frickin job. And you might post for an entire page ranting about something that you don't even frickin understand. You might make several posts trying to figure out exactly what it is you're even objecting to just to throw shite at the wall. It's the weirdest thing ever.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:49 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
lsuguy84
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:49 pm to BoarEd
To be clear, nothing you posted today had any factual support for the idea that Tyler had help from the outside.
You pretending that it did is what people called you out on.
Then you start getting in your feelings and accusing people of being fed assets. Which is hilarious given your sniveling bitch fest here.
You pretending that it did is what people called you out on.
Then you start getting in your feelings and accusing people of being fed assets. Which is hilarious given your sniveling bitch fest here.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:50 pm to the808bass
quote:
To be clear, nothing you posted today had any factual support for the idea that Tyler had help from the outside.
To be clear, nothing I have posted today claimed he did.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:52 pm to BoarEd
You’ve been absolutely bodied in every thread you’ve posted in today. It’s time to take a lap and touch some grass. You deserve some you time.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:53 pm to lsuguy84
Hey, it's not my fault a lot of you cannot read and think being "bodied" means being insulted by idiots like yourself who never contribute a frickin thing around here other than childish insults.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:53 pm to BoarEd
Did you have a good cry?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:56 pm to BoarEd
quote:
To be clear, nothing I have posted today claimed he did.
Then what are you on about?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:58 pm to the808bass
quote:
Then what are you on about?
Do I need to explain my post to you? How many times are you going to need help with reading comprehension in a single day?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 4:59 pm to BoarEd
quote:
It is 100% true. And what's even funnier is that you folks (you know who you are) are so predictable at this point that a person could list who exactly will show up in what threads and what they will say. In your case, you will show up in each and every thread that has anything to do with Charlie or Erika Kirk, or Candace Owens. I mean, like it's your frickin job. And you might post for an entire page ranting about something that you don't even frickin understand. You might make several posts trying to figure out exactly what it is you're even objecting to just to throw shite at the wall.
Can’t you see??? Do you not realize what 808 means to Zionists? 808 was the special year ended at the start of Tishri 1 or sunset September 30 in 808 B.C. This was the 85th Sabbatical since the children of Israel received their inheritance in the Promised Land in 1398 B.C. It’s all connected! You and Candace are almost through cracking the code! She said she’s got some explosive stuff on Monday…just keep tuning in and buying merch so she can keep asking questions and speaking truth!!
/s/
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:01 pm to Marshhen
I'll leave the Candace Owens stuff to you guys here that seem obsessed with her. For my part I barely know who the woman is and have never watched a single podcast of hers.
I'll bet you 100 dollars right now that between me and 808bass, he posts about her, or in threads related to her, 10 fold more often than I do.
Wanna take that bet?
I'll bet you 100 dollars right now that between me and 808bass, he posts about her, or in threads related to her, 10 fold more often than I do.
Wanna take that bet?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:06 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Do I need to explain my post to you? How many times are you going to need help with reading comprehension in a single day?
You’re barely coherent on this subject. You said that people start losing their mind when you post anything about the tranny, not acting alone. Then you admit that nothing you posted today had anything to do with him acting with support. So your premise that people get in a tizzy based on the fact that he wasn’t acting alone is wrong.
Now post some nonsense bullshite
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:10 pm to the808bass
quote:
You said that people start losing their mind when you post anything about the tranny, not acting alone.
Incorrect. You fail at reading yet again. I said people "lose their mind" when someone posts something about the Tranny not acting alone. Not me. In this case, this thread is about Candace Owens and two other people (Ian Carroll being one of the other two). People who can actually comprehend what they're reading should take that to mean that people here lose their minds when people post shite that those people in the OP have said.
This should have been obvious considering I personally have not suggested the transformer didn't act alone. But you failed that bit of comprehension as well.
This post was edited on 7/11/26 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:16 pm to Geekboy
I have no conspiracy theories, however, for a while after the shooting, I heard that there was no exit would from a 30-06. I assume that was incorrect info. Can anyone clarify?
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:21 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
have no conspiracy theories, however, for a while after the shooting, I heard that there was no exit would from a 30-06. I assume that was incorrect info. Can anyone clarify
There was allegedly no exit wound. The shooter supposedly used a soft point .30-06 round and not a full metal jacket round. These rounds will mushroom on impact to create a larger entry wound and will not penetrate as deeply as a full metal jacketed round.
Even considering this it is a strange occurrence. Even a soft point .30-06 round can be expected to penetrate soft tissue at a depth of up to 24 inches, which is plenty to pass through a person's neck. People say it hit his spine. Which, granted, bullets do weird things inside the body when they hit bone, but from everything I've heard, the round didn't hit him in the center of the neck and the autopsy report is not available. So I'm not sure how it is people seem to know it hit his spine.
In any event, it seems to be a weird circumstance, no matter what the case may be. It is indeed entirely possible that he was hit with a .30-06 round and it didn't pass through. Again, bullets behave strangely once inside a body.
Posted on 7/11/26 at 5:22 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Baw, you haint never done shot no hwat-tayle dyeer ifn you thank a thutty owt syix ain’t gonna blow the frick out the back of a lil bitty neck.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News