- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The melt begins! Uranium One
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
The melt begins! Uranium One
quote:
this has been debunked so many times
Two questions:
1. When was it debunked?
2. Who did the debunking?
The only debunking I've heard is from the Clinton camp, and I'm pretty sure they aren't a good source.
Besides, New shite has come to light.
Here is Fox News debunking this bullshite today.
all you need to know about Uranium One
4
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:10 pm to Cruiserhog
Wow. Fox News also debunked Muh Russia.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:10 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Here is Fox News debunking this bullshite today.
Shep
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:12 pm to marklsu
quote:
Bribery has a 5 year statute of limitations---isn't that what you Trumpkins are accusing Clinton of?
Is Russia an enemy of the US?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:13 pm to Strannix
I have a SJW saying Uranium 1 is just a fabrication, and that even Fox News is admitting it is a sham. Ya'll got one singular link I should show her to make it clear that Uranium 1 is very very real?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:16 pm to Strannix
quote:
The melt begins!
Who is doing all this melting?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:18 pm to Strannix
Ain't gonna happen. Sessions told Rep. Jordan during the testimony something like "I don't care what it looks like, looking like isn't grounds for a special counsel."
Besides, Sessions recused himself and has no authority to appoint one in the first place. And Rod Rosenstein certainly ain't gonna do it since he was involved in Uranium One himself.
Besides, Sessions recused himself and has no authority to appoint one in the first place. And Rod Rosenstein certainly ain't gonna do it since he was involved in Uranium One himself.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:19 pm to Cruiserhog
The legality of lack there of of the Uranium 1 scandal is irrelevant. I won’t take accusations of Russian collusion seriously from the same people who sold a Russian company with ties to the Kremlin shares in a strategic national asset while at the same time getting 500K per speech and money flowing into the Clinton Foundation.
Maybe Uranium 1 was completely above board and maybe Trump is literally in Putin’s pocket. But if Putin and Russia are literally the worst enemy that this country has ever faced then why is Clinton speaking there for money? Why are they allowed to own our Uranium? Why did Obama, with Hillary as SecState cancel our missile shield in Poland the second Putin told them to?
Either Putin and Russia are our mortal enemies and anyone who had anything to do with them is guilty of collusion and treason and conspiracy and anything else you can come up with, or they’re not and we can all go along on our merry fricking way.
Maybe Uranium 1 was completely above board and maybe Trump is literally in Putin’s pocket. But if Putin and Russia are literally the worst enemy that this country has ever faced then why is Clinton speaking there for money? Why are they allowed to own our Uranium? Why did Obama, with Hillary as SecState cancel our missile shield in Poland the second Putin told them to?
Either Putin and Russia are our mortal enemies and anyone who had anything to do with them is guilty of collusion and treason and conspiracy and anything else you can come up with, or they’re not and we can all go along on our merry fricking way.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:27 pm to DirtyMike
quote:That's not what he said in the article you linked.
Sessions says not enough basis to investigate Clinton
Maybe next time, champ.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:30 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
quote:
Bribery has a 5 year statute of limitations---isn't that what you Trumpkins are accusing Clinton of?
Is Russia an enemy of the US?
Russia is an enemy of the US. Fox News debunked Uranium One. Every credible news source has too. Literally all of them. Jeff Sessions said it isn't happening today. And even if they wanted to bring charges (which a lot do) bribery has a 5-year statue of limitations. There is NO legal case. Only case they could bring is Ethics.... which wouldn't have any teeth.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:32 pm to marklsu
quote:Define debunked. Are you saying our Uranium wasn’t sold told to a Russian firm with close ties to the Kremlin? Because that’s what you’re implying.
Russia is an enemy of the US. Fox News debunked Uranium One. Every credible news source has too. Literally all of them.
Also when did Russia become our enemy? Just curious
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:32 pm to LSURussian
quote:
quote:
Sessions says not enough basis to investigate Clinton
Maybe next time, champ.
That's not what he said in the article you linked.
Sessions testified today that there has to be a standard met for bringing a special prosecutor.... he flatly told Republicans they don't have the facts to bring a case.
It doesn't get clearer than that.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:33 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Russia is an enemy of the US. Fox News debunked Uranium One. Every credible news source has too. Literally all of them.
Define debunked. Are you saying our Uranium wasn’t sold told to a Russian firm with close ties to the Kremlin? Because that’s what you’re implying.
Sold for a quid pro quo. Sold in a nefarious manner. Sold for any illegal reason. That is the charge behind the buzz words "Uranium One".
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:34 pm to marklsu
quote:Why would we sell uranium to our enemy? Also when did Russia become our enemy?
Sold for a quid pro quo. Sold in a nefarious manner. Sold for any illegal reason. That is the charge behind the buzz words "Uranium One".
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:35 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
melt begins! Uranium One
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:36 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Also when did Russia become our enemy? Just curious
Russia became our enemy when Hitler and Nazis lost WWII.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:36 pm to marklsu
quote:
Sessions testified today that there has to be a standard met for bringing a special prosecutor.... he flatly told Republicans they don't have the facts to bring a case.
You guys should be asking why is Sessions (a Russian) trying to squash an investigation into Russian bribery and the takeover of American uranium? I mean obviously it's because he is dirty.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:37 pm to marklsu
quote:Which is not the same as saying there is nothing to investigate. The DoJ has many investigations going on which do not require a special prosecutor.
Sessions testified today that there has to be a standard met for bringing a special prosecutor...
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:37 pm to marklsu
quote:Then I’ll refer you to my post a bit further up the page and ask again why anyone would think it’s okay to sell Uranium to our enemy.
Russia became our enemy when Hitler and Nazis lost WWII.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:43 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Why would we sell uranium to our enemy? Also when did Russia become our enemy?
WTF.... This is clear you don't know what the Uranium One deal is....
Explanation:
The deal in question involves the sale of a Canadian company, Uranium One, with mining interests in the U.S. to Rosatom, Russia’s nuclear energy agency. The sale occurred in stages, beginning in 2009 when Rosatom purchased a minority stake in Uranium One, and continued in 2010, when the Russian agency took ownership of a 51 percent share of the company. In 2013, a third transaction gave Rosatom full ownership of Uranium One.
With its purchase of Uranium One, Rosatom assumed control of roughly 20 percent of uranium production capacity in the U.S.
The current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium outside the country, according to OilPrice.com. and Politico and Politifact and FactCheck
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News