- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Medium income Amercan Family now earns 1/2 the income needed to buy the avg home.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:08 pm to Powerman
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:08 pm to Powerman
In urban areas, where 80% of the population lives, the average 1 bed is 600 to 900 square feet, and 2 beds get up to 1400 on the high end
People are not complaining about the housing costs of 2,000+ square foot homes
People are not complaining about the housing costs of 2,000+ square foot homes
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:08 pm to Powerman
quote:
No...the real problem is #1 is barely attainable for a decent portion of the population. In most markets you aren't even getting a studio for under 1200
You say there is a problem but how is this problem manifesting itself? Homeownership rates are roughly the same today as they were in 1980. And only about 4% lower than the peak about a decade ago. If it's so much harder how the frick is that number staying flat?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:09 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
A 1600 ft home built in 1980 would probably run about 700 to 800K where I am. Let's not pretend there is some surplus of affordable modestly sized homes on the market.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:11 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
Homeownership rates are roughly the same today as they were in 1980. And only about 4% lower than the peak about a decade ago. If it's so much harder how the frick is that number staying flat?
I wouldn't expect the numbers to have moved that much when the run up in residential real estate is largely 2021 on forward. People sure as shite aren't selling if they're in a 3 percent mortgage.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:11 pm to Powerman
quote:
1600 ft home built in 1980 would probably run about 700 to 800K where I am. Let's not pretend there is some surplus of affordable modestly sized homes on the market
Again actual reality contradicts your position. Homeownership rate has barely budged. As for your claim on the home from 1980 without knowing where you live I really can't comment. But I can say that assertion is wildly the exception and not the rule
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:12 pm to Powerman
quote:
I wouldn't expect the numbers to have moved that much when the run up in residential real estate is largely 2021 on forward. People sure as shite aren't selling if they're in a 3 percent mortgage.
You do realize you don't have to guess. A simple Google search will show you just how stable homeownership rate has been for like 50 years. So literally nothing you just said is relevant
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:14 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Again...the recency of it wouldn't move the numbers much
If home stay at the same affordability level home ownership will decrease
If home stay at the same affordability level home ownership will decrease
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:17 pm to Powerman
quote:
Again...the recency of it wouldn't move the numbers much
If home stay at the same affordability level home ownership will decrease
The entire home argument from folks like you on this subject seems to be basically an article of faith based on nothing.
It would be like discovering that for the last 50 years the average number of people who owned a new cars stayed basically the same. And the car equivalent of Power Man showed up complaining about how much more difficult it is to buy a car today
But then we looked and discovered that while the rates stayed the same the average person in 1980 was buying a Toyota Corolla and the average person today was buying a BMW 5 Series.
Reality completely contradicts the argument. Not only do just as many people own homes today as ever have but they're buying nicer homes! Far nicer homes. Like not even close nicer homes
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:18 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
The entire home argument from folks like you on this subject seems to be basically an article of faith based on nothing.
About 3/4 home owners are in mortgages with sub 5% mortgage rates
They're not selling anytime soon
You seem to be the one dreaming up fantasies here. Not me. The current affordability rates aren't sustainable over the long term.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:24 pm to Powerman
quote:
You seem to be the one dreaming up fantasies here. Not me. The current affordability rates aren't sustainable over the long term.
Oh spare me. I'm referring to what's actually happening in the real world. You might want to check what homeownership rates were before the 5% rates and the 4% rates. You'll discover they were largely stable. And again you're completely ignoring the fact that people aren't just buying the same kind of homes. They're buying exponentially better homes. I mean what the frick do you think the homeownership rate would be today if the typical new home was 1600 square feet with carpeted floors and no granite countertops! The only thing keeping the rate down where it is is the fact that the homes are so much fricking nicer. Home builders aren't stupid. They're building those homes because people want to and CAN buy them. But let's say the ability to buy the much nicer home slows and builders start building 1600 square foot homes. That would still keep the rate stable.
When you talk about a home from 1980 versus a home from today you're not even comparing the same fricking thing. It literally is like walking out of the BMW dealer bitching about how cheap you used to be able to get a Corolla for 30 years ago
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:25 pm to Powerman
What do you mean people dont want to sell their home on a 3-5% mortgage so they can take on a 7% on their new home 
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:27 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
The facts simply don't support your ramblings. The combination of rates and home prices has made homes significantly more difficult to attain for people with middle class incomes. Even when you adjust for quality of home.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:29 pm to Powerman
The national debt was well under a trillion in 1980. Boomers spent 35 trillion at the fed level, and trillions more at local and state. The whole "we had it tougher" spiel is old, they left everyone under the age of 45 a pile of shite
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:29 pm to Powerman
quote:
The facts simply don't support your ramblings. The combination of rates and home prices has made homes significantly more difficult to attain for people with middle class incomes. Even when you adjust for quality of home.
The absolute fact is that the typical home being bought today is nicer and the rate of ownership has remained the same. And that friend didn't start with the low interest rates of the last 5 to 10 years. That's the fact you can't ignore it. And you can't explain it.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:31 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
The median price of a home was roughly 2x the median income. Today, it’s 6.5x the median income.
Damn, I wonder how much someone would have to pay per month to buy my house. Perhaps 2x as much as I pay for a 2011 note?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:32 pm to GeauxBurrow312
quote:
The national debt was well under a trillion in 1980. Boomers spent 35 trillion at the fed level, and trillions more at local and state. The whole "we had it tougher" spiel is old, they left everyone under the age of 45 a pile of shite
The overwhelming majority of the national budget problem can be traced all the way back to FDR. They created massive government entitlements that pretty much required demographics stay the same or become more favorable. The baby boom basically turned all of those entitlements into a massive drug for our government because of the enormous influx of young tax paying citizens. The ensuing baby bust completely fricked the demographics and not a single person in Washington DC with extremely rare exception wanted to break the news to the American public. So we have all of this shite in our government that is legally required to grow at a certain rate absent legislation to repeal it and nothing about the underlying assumptions from when they were created still exists. But if you try to talk about any of that stuff everyone loses their mind
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:34 pm to baldona
quote:
have a low to mid level manager that works in my office in Destin, and she is making under $65,900. She is in the process of buying a brand new townhome for $355,000 in south Walton.
What is that % of her take home? 70%?
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:34 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
Agree with you there. FDR and LBJ, with their "great society" was the single worst thing to ever happen to this country.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:34 pm to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
The absolute fact is that the typical home being bought today is nicer and the rate of ownership has remained the same. And that friend didn't start with the low interest rates of the last 5 to 10 years. That's the fact you can't ignore it. And you can't explain it.
You're just making things up. The bottom 3rd of existing homes have appreciated at a much faster clip than the middle and top 3rd. You know nothing about the facts of the situation. You're just doing your get off of my lawn routine because you're a loser.
Posted on 3/12/25 at 11:34 pm to djsdawg
About 62%, before healthcare, car, groceries, retirement savings
Popular
Back to top



0




