- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The government is creating a hoax before our eyes
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:14 am to notsince98
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:14 am to notsince98
Obama already has a plan as to why we will never be shown the findings of the intelligence agencies. It's all classified, so we can't see it. It's right up there with Joseph Smith with the golden tablets in the box.
"So, sorry, guy. It's classified. Just take our word for it. It was Russians."
"So, sorry, guy. It's classified. Just take our word for it. It was Russians."
0
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:15 am to Rover Range
quote:
It seems you still think all of those GOVERNMENT bodies tell the truth and have YOUR best interest at heart. You are a sheep
yeah thats me... and this isnt about my best interests, my best interests are the safety of myself and my family, which to me involves figuring out if someone or a group of people hacked into the DNC and what their motivation for that is, is it to help Trump get elected? if so, why?
I do plenty of my own research to come to my own conlcusions and when the top intelligence agencies in agreement that the russians are behind it, it seems likely that is the case.
I don't even understand all the pushback, why are yall trying to protect Russia? we know someone hacked, we need to understand why and in order to do that we have to know who.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:18 am to Scruffy
quote:
No evidence has been put forth. I do not trust any government official merely on their word, and neither should you.
Oh i dont, I was in the navy, i learned my lesson
but at the same time, i have no reason to discredit their findings here
I just want an investigation to find out what actually did happen and who did it
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:18 am to imjustafatkid
This is the reason why the false narrative of "fake news" is being spread. They want you to forget about Seth Rich, if you don't they want you to think it is "fake news".
Any updates on the murder of Seth Rich?
Any updates on the murder of Seth Rich?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:19 am to Rover Range
quote:
do you not disagree with the media collusion and the collusion between the Clinton campaign and Super Pacs? How exactly was the election tampered with other than uncovering some nasty stuff that proved how sick and twisted your politicians and government officials are?
as i stated earlier, I am glad that we got to see this information and see how fricked up all this shite is
that doesnt mean whoever did it should come out unscathed
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:19 am to Theboot32
I'm not trying to protect Russia.. read my last post on the last page.. why are you taking up for the DNC? Why do you refuse to discuss the underhanded shite I'm the emails? Nobody has claimed the emails weren't real.. why can't you see what the global elites are doing alll over the world? Because you're a sheep
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:20 am to cajunangelle
quote:
This is the reason why the false narrative of "fake news" is being spread. They want you to forget about Seth Rich, if you don't they want you to think it is "fake news".
I'm very interested in this as well, and I have not forgot about him and I try to find info on this all the time
pretty shady situation no doubt
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:20 am to Theboot32
Why wouldn't you believe the Australian hacker that said it wasn't Russia. Why would you believe the director of the agency that said Hillary didn't commit any crimes in her email scandal?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:22 am to Rover Range
quote:
Why wouldn't you believe the Australian hacker that said it wasn't Russia.
point me to it and ill check it out, first ive heard of this...
but i will say some guy in australia has a little less credibility than the heads of our intelligence agencies, and I'm in no way saying they should go unquestioned either
quote:
hy would you believe the director of the agency that said Hillary didn't commit any crimes in her email scandal?
well he said she was negligent, just there was no criminal intent, as in she wasnt trying to spread secrets, she's just a dipshit
by the way, i think she should have been indicted, if i would have done the same thing with classified info i handled i would have been charged
This post was edited on 12/19/16 at 11:27 am
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:26 am to Deuces
Sandy hook , Boston Bombing , 911 and the list goes on and on.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:27 am to Theboot32
Julian assange is the Australian.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:28 am to Rover Range
quote:
Julian assange is the Australian.
gotcha, thought you were talking about some other hacker or something
well if he knows that russia isnt behind it, why isnt he showing or telling us who did?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:35 am to Theboot32
quote:
I dont understand the motivation to create a hoax, can you shed some light on that? is it just so that there will be doubt about the legitimacy of a MAGA president?
Part of it is that the narcisists cant admit that their candidate and policies were rejected. Mainly, this "Russia cheated for Trump" narrative is there to do several things. First, it sows fear within a generation raised on Soviet boogeymen. Fear is a key component in class warfare. Next, it delegitimizes Trump, giving dem legislators all over the country cover to oppose his agenda (i.e. no mandate). Third, it reinforces failed foreign policy maneuvers and future war profiteering. Remember that donors are three, billion dollar-plus campaigns in the hole and they want their pay back. Lastly, I think this will be used to push more cyber snooping and control over the Web. The new media and conservative message boards were critical to the Trump victory. Dems are already branding this as fake news and need an excuse to "commandeer" the internet and stop it. They've already tapped our phones in the name of national security.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:36 am to Theboot32
What if...... he was given the info by Seth Rich.. if he is one of the Wikileaks contributors, wouldn't he know
This post was edited on 12/19/16 at 11:51 am
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Part of it is that the narcisists cant admit that their candidate and policies were rejected. Mainly, this "Russia cheated for Trump" narrative is there to do several things. First, it sows fear within a generation raised on Soviet boogeymen. Fear is a key component in class warfare. Next, it delegitimizes Trump, giving dem legislators all over the country cover to oppose his agenda (i.e. no mandate). Third, it reinforces failed foreign policy maneuvers and future war profiteering. Remember that donors are three, billion dollar-plus campaigns in the hole and they want their pay back. Lastly, I think this will be used to push more cyber snooping and control over the Web. The new media and conservative message boards were critical to the Trump victory. Dems are already branding this as fake news and need an excuse to "commandeer" the internet and stop it. They've already tapped our phones in the name of national security.
thanks for putting some thought into your response, trying to educate myself. I hope, if this is true, somehow it can be proven. Gotta think with the access the "hackers" had they should be able to turn something up that exposes this.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:42 am to Theboot32
quote:Wikileaks never reveals their sources. The only reason Assange publicly stated it wasnt Russia is because the entirety of the US media was losing their collective shite perpetuating that lie.
well if he knows that russia isnt behind it, why isnt he showing or telling us who did?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:42 am to Rover Range
quote:
What if...... he wasn't given the info by Seth Rich.. if he is one of the Wikileaks contributors, wouldn't he know
I don't really follow you here. I understand that it is believed that Rich was the source to Assange on a lot of things. So you are implying that Seth Rich was murdered before he could tell Assange who was behind this?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:49 am to imjustafatkid
HRC and the DNC need to suck it up and take responsibility for the corruption exposed in the Emails. Who exposed the corruption matters not. It's a national moral and ethical disgrace when Wikileaks provides the transparency that the Obama Administration promised us. We were promised change and all we got was more corruption. The government needs to act on the corruption exposed. We need governmental responsibility.
Posted on 12/19/16 at 11:52 am to Theboot32
Typo..meant to put "was"
Posted on 12/19/16 at 12:59 pm to notsince98
W
I
K
I
L
E
A
K
S
They proved what most normal people with a functioning brain already knew. NEVER under any circumstances trust ANY form of government. obammy, shitlary, and every other libtarded democrat has proven this to be abundantly clear. For further proof, I present exhibit A, the msm, as one of the lying arms of the democRATS!
I
K
I
L
E
A
K
S
They proved what most normal people with a functioning brain already knew. NEVER under any circumstances trust ANY form of government. obammy, shitlary, and every other libtarded democrat has proven this to be abundantly clear. For further proof, I present exhibit A, the msm, as one of the lying arms of the democRATS!
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News